Elsevier

Medical Hypotheses

Volume 84, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 122-128
Medical Hypotheses

The prestige model of spectrum bipolarity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2014.12.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Because affective pathogenesis is a hard problem for psychiatry, it behoves researchers to develop and test novel models of causality. We examine the notion that the adaptive drive to social investment – prestige – provides clues to the bipolar spectrum. A seven node bipolar spectrum is proposed, based on a putative gradient of “bipolarity”. It is conceived that this gradient may correlate with the drive to social investment (prestige). In order to test this hypothesis with proof of concept data, a case control study categorised 228 subjects into a seven node bipolar spectrum. Whilst controlling for mood elevation and depression, differences in strategic prestige (leadership) motivation (MSPM) between spectrum groups were examined. The bipolar I (S1) node had a greater strategic prestige (leadership) motivation score than the controls (S7) by 21.17 points, 95% CI [8.16, 34.18], p < .001, d = 1.05, while the bipolar II (S2) node was higher than the control group by 16.73 points, 95% CI [0.92, 32.54], p = .030, d = 0.84. Whilst the pseudounipolar (S3) node (those with depression and bipolar family histories; n = 17) had only a marginally statistical difference in MSPM compared to controls (p = .051), the mean difference (16.98) and d value (0.86) indicated an elevated MSPM level. Prestige (leadership) motivation score positively correlated with dimensional lifetime bipolarity (Mood Disorder Questionnaire) score (rp = 0.47), supporting the spectrum prestige motivation gradient notion. Evidence is presented for a genetic disposition to elevated strategic prestige (leadership) motivation. Sensitivity to Social Inclusion (MSIS), Contingency of Self-Worth (CSW.av) and tension significantly predicted strategic prestige (leadership) motivation (MSPM) score in a multiple regression. – suggesting that a vulnerability of the social self may be a feature of bipolar disorders. The prestige model of spectrum bipolarity offers a new conceptualisation of affective disorders and has received preliminary support.

Introduction

A spectrum is a system in which components are contiguously distributed according to rank – best exemplified by the spread of the wavelengths of light – as induced by refraction through a prism. A cyclothymic-bipolar spectrum was first proposed by Akiskal et al. [1], while Klerman [2] suggested a mania spectrum. Ghaemi et al. [3] incepted a model of bipolar spectrum disorder, which bridges the gulf between bipolar I disorder and major depressive disorder. In a fully dimensional spectrum as practiced at Harvard [4], varying degrees of bipolarity are represented. Phelps et al. [5] conceived a revised DSM system, which may conceivably incorporate the bipolar spectrum approach, but equally maintain categories. Can, therefore, an aetiological substrate for the bipolar spectrum be described and can differences in spectrum nodes be established?

Prestige refers to the capacity of the group to invest in the individual [6]. In evolutionary time marginalisation was a survival risk and prestige predicated social inclusion and fitness. Behaviours such as narrative-making, prosodic speech, social engagement, gesture, creativity and mood elevation enhance prestige through object approach – it is noteworthy that these are behaviours inherent to hypomania [7]. Depressive social withdrawal, on the other hand, may be seen as an abrogation of prestige – an attempt at stealth – so as to avoid ostracism [7], comparable to the social risk hypothesis of Allen and Badcock [8]. It is argued that the prototypes of affective interpersonal approach and withdrawal were selected for in ancestral contexts because they enhanced fitness when individual social inclusion was threatened. In turn, the “byproduct” [9] dispositions to more severe, psychotic, and non-adaptive mania and melancholia were “carried along” with their concomitant adaptations.

The present study introduces the concept of social investment (prestige) as a prime driver in the emergence of bipolar spectrum disorders. It provides a structural model for a bipolar spectrum, based on clinical and genetic gradients – suggesting the functional basis for each category. The prestige model of spectrum bipolarity predicts that persons with high bipolarity will have a higher disposition to prestige (leadership) motivation (MSPM) than controls. This is based on the hypothesis that hypomanic and depressive behaviours have co-evolved with this disposition.

Section snippets

Ethics statement

This research (and its consent procedure) was approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committees of The University of Melbourne and Peninsula Health. Because it represents confidential human research, the dissemination of data was forbidden by the Ethics committees. Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to each survey and data analysis was undertaken anonymously.

Sample

The Measurement of Prestige Factors (MOPF) project was an observational case control study of adults 18–65 years of age with

Statistical analyses

Data was collected by means of either a web link or facsimile paper survey (undertaken onsite or at home) after verbal informed consent was obtained for all participants. Sporadic single item missing data was managed through the scale items being averaged to a scale total, though where more than 40% of the fields were missing the item was deleted. Cases with completely missing MDQ or spectrum values, or missing multiple scales, were deleted (13/241 surveys). The SIP scale was modified by means

Discussion

This study demonstrates that the drive to prestige (MSPM) is positively associated with both a clinical and, in some nodes, a familial history of bipolarity – this is a novel and preliminary finding. But what is the prestige (leadership) motivation construct and how might it theoretically relate to bipolar disorder? MSPM links strongly to how contingent self worth is on appearance, approval and competition. It relates even more strongly to MSIS – the responsiveness to social inclusion and

Conclusions

This paper has proposed a spectrum model for the bipolar diathesis and suggested that this may be related to the motivated drive for prestige leadership. It is conceived that this correlation arose in evolutionary time as a consequence of the incipient marginality of early human groups. A conceptual basis for bipolar spectrum nodes has been suggested and this has been provisionally tested by reference to prestige (leadership) motivation. This has been augmented by evidence of the co-occurrence

Abbreviations list

ASRM, Altman Self Rating Mania Scale.

MDQ, Mood Disorder Questionnaire.

MOPF, Measurement of Prestige Factors Study.

MSIS, MOPF Social Inclusion Sensitivity.

MSPM, MOPF strategic prestige (leadership) motivation.

nlogSIPS, natural log transformation of SIPS.

NHST, Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.

PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (for depressive symptoms).

SIPS, Social Inclusion and Prestige Scale.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The research was not externally funded.

Acknowledgements

Robert King undertook the factor analysis for the MSPM scale. Garry McInerney undertook the general practice arm, while Peninsula Health staff administered the Mental Health surveys. We thank the participants who took the time to complete the survey. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript.

References (43)

  • N.S. Ghaemi et al.

    “Cade’s disease” and beyond: misdiagnosis, antidepressant use, and a proposed definition for bipolar spectrum disorder

    Can J Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • J. Phelps

    The bipolar spectrum

  • J. Phelps et al.

    Validity and utility of bipolar spectrum models

    Bipolar Disord

    (2008)
  • J.S. Price et al.

    Territory rank and mental health: the history of an idea

    Evol Psychol

    (2007)
  • J.M. Le Bas et al.

    Prestige and bipolarity

    Australas Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • N.B. Allen et al.

    The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives

    Psychol Bull

    (2003)
  • D. Buss

    Evolutionary psychology – the new science of the mind

    (2012)
  • R.M.A. Hirschfeld et al.

    Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the mood disorder questionnaire

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • R.M.A. Hirschfeld et al.

    Screening for bipolar disorder in patients treated for depression in a family medicine clinic

    J Am Board Fam Pract

    (2005)
  • R.L. Spitzer et al.

    Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD

    JAMA J Am Med Assoc

    (1999)
  • K. Kroenke et al.

    The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text