Enhancing gas permeability in mixed matrix membranes through tuning the nanoparticle properties
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) have been considered since the 1970s as an effective approach to improve the performance of both gas separation and water treatment polymeric membrane systems [1], [2], [3]. In this approach, nano-particulate fillers are added into the polymer phase, generally causing an enhancement in permeability and/or change in penetrant selectivity. A large number of MMMs using zeolites [4], silicas [5], [6], [7], carbons [8], [9], [10], metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [11], zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) [12], [13], [14] and porous organic polymers (POPs) [15] have been shown to be promising candidates for gas separation applications. However, these MMMs are normally tested in isolation and rarely compared to each other. In the present work, a comparative study of gas separation using MMMs containing a variety of different nanoparticles has enabled important new insights into the factors that impact membrane performance.
The particles need to be well dispersed to guarantee the separation performance. One of the critical issues for MMMs is the presence of interfacial defects around the particles, which are caused by particle aggregation and poor particle–polymer interaction [16]. Such defects in the membrane can significantly reduce the gas selectivity and are also often related to increases in permeability. Therefore, MMM research has focused not only on the improvement of gas separation performance but also the preparation protocols and particle modifications to prevent or control these interfacial defects [17].
A number of workers have used computational approaches to evaluate the effect of nanoparticle properties [18], [19]. Their performance is also often predicted through mathematical models from the relatively simple Maxwell model [20] to others significantly more complex [21]. The Maxwell model [20] is considered appropriate for low particle concentrationswhere Peff is the effective permeability of the mixed matrix membrane, ϕ is the volume fraction and P the permeability of the dispersed (d) and continuous (c) phases respectively. The Bruggeman [22] (Eq. 2) and Lewis–Nielsen [23] (Eq. 3) models were introduced to model systems with higher particle loadingswhere α=Pd/Pc and ψ=1+[(1−ϕm)/ϕm2]ϕd, in which ϕm is the maximum achievable volume fraction of the particles, which is affected by factors such as particle shape, size, size distribution, and agglomeration. Mahajan and Koros also reported a modified Maxwell model that accounted for interfacial defects (i) [16]
However, an experimental evaluation of the impact of particle properties across a wide range of different nanoparticles has never been reported. In this work, we report for the first time the gas permeation properties of a series of MMMs in a glassy polymer substrate to determine the dominant particle properties and explain the permeation using a simple free volume-based model.
Section snippets
Materials
The base polymer material used as a host matrix in this research was Matrimid®5218 (3,3,4,4-benzophenone tetracarboxylicdianhydride-diaminophenylidane) polyimide purchased from Huntsman Advanced Materials Americas Inc., America, in a powdered state. This polyimide was purified by solution and re-precipitation using methanol (Analytical reagent, Chem-Supply, Australia) and dichloromethane (DCM, Analytical reagent, Chem-Supply, Australia) to remove impurities. Carbon nanoparticles (Product
Characterization
The water uptake value of membranes prepared from Cu-BTC was around 2.8 times higher than that of the base Matrimid, while that for a membrane prepared with POP-2 was 40% lower than that of Matrimid (Table 1). The data suggests the order of hydrophilicity of the MMMs is Cu-BTC>ZIF-8>Carbon C>Carbon B>Matrimid>Carbon A>POP-2.
The particle size distributions of the carbon (Carbon A, B, and C) and MOF (Cu-BTC and ZIF-8) nanoparticles are presented in Fig. 1. We could not obtain a reasonable
Conclusion
We have prepared defect-free self-standing MMMs from different nanoparticles embedded in a glassy polymer membrane, fabricated by the solvent casting method. Gas permeabilities of all MMMs were shown to increase with increasing filler loading without any reduction in the gas selectivity. Critically, the permeability of all gas species was shown to be strongly correlated with the free volume of the mixed matrix membrane and this factor was more relevant than the particle size or hydrophobicity.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Scientific and Industry Endowment Fund in Australia (SIEF Grant ID RP02-035) and a Grant-in-Aid for the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows (JSPS Grant ID 2410856).
References (41)
- et al.
Zeolite-filled silicone rubber membranes: part 1. membrane preparation and pervaporation results
J. Membr. Sci.
(1987) - et al.
Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: a new concept for reverse osmosis membranes
J. Membr. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Gas permeation through H2-selective mixed matrix membranes: experimental and neural network modeling
Int. J. Hydrog. Energy
(2013) - et al.
Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves: I. Preparation and experimental results
J. Membr. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Transport and separation properties of carbon nanotube-mixed matrix membrane
Sep. Purif. Technol.
(2009) - et al.
ABS copolymer-activated carbon mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation
J. Membr. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
Highly permeable zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-71 nano-particles enhanced polyimide membranes for gas separation
J. Membr. Sci.
(2014) - et al.
State-of-the-art membrane based CO2 separation using mixed matrix membranes (MMMs): an overview on current status and future directions
Prog. Polym. Sci.
(2014) - et al.
Computational screening of metal organic frameworks for mixed matrix membrane applications
J. Membr. Sci.
(2012) - et al.
The thickness dependence of Matrimid films in water vapor permeation
Chem. Eng. J.
(2012)
Characterization of permeability and sorption in Matrimid/C60 mixed matrix membranes
J. Membr. Sci.
Operating temperature effects on the plasticization of polyimide gas separation membranes
J. Membr. Sci.
Asymmetric Matrimid®/[Cu3(BTC)2] mixed-matrix membranes for gas separations
J. Membr. Sci.
High pressure methane adsorption in the metal–organic frameworks Cu3(btc)2, Zn2(bdc)2dabco, and Cr3F(H2O)2O(bdc)3
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
Mixed-matrix membranes composed of Matrimid® and mesoporous ZSM-5 nanoparticles
J. Membr. Sci.
Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation
Prog. Polym. Sci.
Nanoporous carbon membrane for gas separation
Gas Sep. Purif.
Correlation and prediction of gas permeability in glassy polymer membrane materials via a modified free volume based group contribution method.
J. Membr. Sci.
Analysis of dual-mode model parameters for gas sorption in glassy polymers
J. Membr. Sci.
Physical aging of thin glassy polymer films: free volume interpretation
J. Membr. Sci.
Cited by (61)
A comprehensive review of carbon capture science and technologies
2024, Carbon Capture Science and TechnologyDirect evaluation of void effect on gas permeation in mixed matrix membrane by non-equilibrium molecular dynamics
2023, Journal of Membrane ScienceCovalent triazine framework CTF-fluorene as porous filler material in mixed matrix membranes for CO<inf>2</inf>/CH<inf>4</inf> separation
2021, Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsA novel ternary mixed matrix membrane comprising polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-modified poly (ether-block-amide)(Pebax®1657)/graphene oxide nanoparticles for CO<inf>2</inf> separation
2020, Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionNanocomposite Membranes for Gas Separation
2020, Nanocomposite Membranes for Gas Separation