Elsevier

Journal of Membrane Science

Volume 523, 1 February 2017, Pages 144-162
Journal of Membrane Science

Mechanisms of flux decline in skim milk ultrafiltration: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.036Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Concentration polarisation (CP) and fouling in skim milk UF are critically reviewed.

  • Fouling in skim milk UF is primarily due to proteins; mineral fouling is minor.

  • Recent studies of casein micelle packing are discussed in relation to CP and gel layers.

  • Progress towards mathematical modelling of skim milk UF is reviewed.

  • Analysis of fouling and cleaning studies indicate ways to improve membrane cleaning.

Abstract

Skim milk ultrafiltration (UF), used for milk protein concentration, is one of the most important unit operations in dairy processing. However UF performance is severely reduced by flux decline resulting from concentration polarisation (CP) and fouling, the mechanisms of which are still not fully understood for the complex colloidal fluid of skim milk. In this review, we analyse published observations of CP and fouling of relevance to skim milk UF to examine the underlying mechanisms. Current approaches for modelling the flux decline caused by CP and fouling are reviewed. Focussed discussion is given to the current state of understanding of CP and fouling in relation to the physicochemical properties of skim milk and the effectiveness of chemical cleaning. This review identifies the roles of various milk components in CP and fouling behaviour and offers insights into the mechanisms that govern flux decline.

Introduction

Skim milk ultrafiltration (UF) is a key unit operation in dairy processing in which milk proteins are concentrated through the removal of lactose, salts, peptides and other solutes, and water. UF exploits size differences in the milk components to preferentially concentrate the proteins, which cannot be achieved by evaporation alone, allowing more flexible control over product composition. In addition, filtration is considerably less energy-intensive [1], [2], and avoids prolonged heat exposure, allowing the functional properties and sensory qualities of milk to be well preserved [3]. It is used extensively in the production of cheese [2], [4], [5], [6], [7] and milk protein concentrates (MPC) [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and also for protein standardisation [5], [6], [7], [8], [10].

Skim milk UF is particularly susceptible to poor operational efficiency [8] due to flux decline resulting from concentration polarisation (CP) and fouling. CP is the accumulation of retained particles at the membrane surface, while fouling occurs due to adsorption or deposition of colloidal particles on the membrane surface and in the membrane pores [2], [11]. CP and fouling contribute resistance to permeation flow, and can be responsible for severe reductions in flux and changes in rejection properties, ultimately resulting in lower throughput and altered product quality. The CP layer is a direct result of flux and is usually reversible in the sense that it will quickly diffuse if flux across the membrane is halted. However, severe CP can also result in the formation of a gel layer formed through particle-particle interactions and such a layer dissipates slowly, if at all, when the flux is halted. From an operational perspective CP is unavoidable but it can be minimised by improving particle convection away from the membrane [2], [12], [13]. On the other hand, fouling is irreversible (upon cessation of flux), and its removal requires back washing or often even chemical cleaning. This interrupts operation, lowers productivity, consumes large amounts of water and chemicals, and reduces membrane life [2].

The optimisation of skim milk UF (both operation and cleaning) requires an understanding of the mechanisms of flux decline in relation to the physicochemical properties of skim milk, however this is still not fully understood despite the widespread use of skim milk UF for over 30 years. In recent years substantial progress has been made in understanding milk chemistry, and separately, the physics of CP and membrane fouling by proteins. In addition significant advances have been made in the development of mathematical models to describe filtration behaviour, in particular via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, this whole body of work has yet to be brought together in the context of skim milk UF and relatively few studies have been made specifically investigating CP and fouling mechanisms in skim milk UF. Past reviews on skim milk UF or dairy filtration have mostly focused on applications and avenues for product development, and very little has been dedicated to the discussion of CP and fouling in relation to the physicochemical properties of skim milk.

In this review we bring together results from recent studies of CP, membrane fouling, and filtration modelling with existing knowledge to extend our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of flux decline in relation to the physicochemical properties of skim milk. Aspects of membrane cleaning and processing factors affecting flux decline are also discussed. Through the analysis of the available literature, we hope to derive new insights that will allow further optimisation of skim milk UF.

Section snippets

The skim milk system

Some knowledge of milk chemistry is necessary for discussing how flux decline behaviour can be affected by changes in milk properties. This section provides an overview of the major milk proteins, mineral equilibria, and casein micelle structure and interactions with the surrounding milk serum.

Skim milk is a complex colloidal suspension of proteins in an aqueous solution of lactose and minerals, and some minor components including residual milk fat globules. Milk proteins make up 3.5 wt% of

Fouling

The term ‘membrane fouling’ is used here to describe changes brought about by interactions between colloidal particles and the membrane (e.g. protein adsorption and mineral precipitation). The resultant membrane-fouling conglomerate has different physicochemical properties compared to the membrane, for instance altered surface charge [48], [49], [50] and reduced pore sizes [51]. Consequently, its separation/fractionation properties are also changed. Fouling can manifest as complete or partial

Concentration polarisation and gel layer formation

During filtration, there is an accumulation of retained colloidal particles at the membrane surface giving rise to a concentration gradient of particles perpendicular to the membrane surface, known as concentration polarisation (CP) [2], [8], [11], [13]. This concentration gradient is the driving force for diffusion of the particles back to the bulk, which at steady state, is in balance with the bulk movement of particles to surface. This layer of concentrated particles generates a resistance

Mathematical modelling of skim milk UF

Mathematical models that can describe filtration behaviour from knowledge of fluid and particle properties are required for predicting and optimising filtration performance. Central to describing this performance, the flux has to be related to the hydraulic resistance resulting from fouling and CP. A large body of work has been devoted to developing mathematical models of cross flow filtration. In this section, basic filtration models are first briefly described and discussed. These models are

Processing factors affecting flux decline

The purpose of this section is to discuss how processing can affect the properties of skim milk, and how in turn filtration behaviour is affected by these changes.

Membrane cleaning

Membrane cleaning is an integral part of membrane processing operations. Fouling not only reduces filtration productivity, it also promotes microbial growth posing a contamination risk for the processed product [8]. As such, regular chemical cleaning is necessary during skim milk UF operation. Fouled membranes are commonly rejuvenated via cleaning in-place (CIP) procedures. A cleaning regime in the dairy industry typically involves an initial water rinse to remove residual milk and loosely

Conclusions

Recent advances in our understanding of milk chemistry, membrane science, and mathematical modelling can yield new insights into the mechanisms of flux decline in skim milk UF. In particular, the past decade has seen significant advances towards characterisation of the CP layer in skim milk UF. The quantification of the intrinsic dewatering properties of casein micelles via osmotic stressing, and the ability to directly observe the behaviour of CMs during filtration have revealed the importance

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Dairy Innovation Australia Limited (DIAL) and the Australian Research Council (ARC) through LP110200570.

References (197)

  • D.S. Horne et al.

    Casein micelle structure: models and muddles

    Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2006)
  • W.J. Donnelly et al.

    A comprehensive study of the relationship between size and protein composition in natural bovine casein micelles

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1984)
  • D.G. Dalgleish et al.

    Size-related differences in bovine casein micelles

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Gen. Subj.

    (1989)
  • C. Holt et al.

    Substructure of bovine casein micelles by small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering

    Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.

    (2003)
  • A. Bouchoux et al.

    Casein micelle dispersions under osmotic stress

    Biophys. J.

    (2009)
  • A. Bouchoux et al.

    How to squeeze a sponge: casein micelles under osmotic stress, a SAXS study

    Biophys. J.

    (2010)
  • R. Gebhardt et al.

    Structural ordering of casein micelles on silicon nitride micro-sieves during filtration

    Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces

    (2011)
  • E.D.D. Bastian et al.

    Ultrafiltration: partitioning of milk constituents into permeate and retentate

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1991)
  • M. Nyström et al.

    Streaming potential as a tool in the characterization of ultrafiltration membranes

    Colloids Surf.

    (1989)
  • N.D. Lawrence et al.

    The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2006)
  • D. Delaunay et al.

    Physico-chemical characterisations of a UF membrane used in dairy application to estimate chemical efficiency of cleaning

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • L. Bégoin et al.

    Methodology of analysis of a spiral-wound module. Application to PES membrane for ultrafiltration of skimmed milk

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • M. Rabiller-Baudry et al.

    Characterisation of cleaned and fouled membrane by ATR---FTIR and EDX analysis coupled with SEM: application to UF of skimmed milk with a PES membrane

    Desalination

    (2002)
  • P.S. Tong et al.

    Characterization of proteinaceous membrane foulants and flux decline during the early stages of whole milk ultrafiltration

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1988)
  • P.S. Tong et al.

    Characterization of proteinaceous membrane foulants from whey ultrafiltration

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1989)
  • J.H. Hanemaaijer et al.

    Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. The role of protein adsorption and salt precipitation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1989)
  • W.S.S. Opong et al.

    Hydraulic permeability of protein layers deposited during ultrafiltration

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1991)
  • M.Đ. Carić et al.

    Fouling of inorganic membranes by adsorption of whey proteins

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • W. Norde

    My voyage of discovery to proteins in flatland... and beyond

    Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces

    (2008)
  • M. Wahlgren et al.

    Protein adsorption to solid surfaces

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (1991)
  • M. Rabe et al.

    Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces

    Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2011)
  • S.T. Kelly et al.

    Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1995)
  • T. Arai et al.

    The behavior of some model proteins at solid-liquid interfaces 1. Adsorption from single protein solutions

    Colloids Surf.

    (1990)
  • L. Ricq et al.

    Electrokinetic characterization of polyethersulfone UF membranes

    Desalination

    (1997)
  • L. Ricq et al.

    Effects of proteins on electrokinetic properties of inorganic membranes during ultra- and micro-filtration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1996)
  • L. Ricq et al.

    Streaming potential and ion transmission during ultra- and microfiltration on inorganic membranes

    Desalination

    (1997)
  • W. Norde et al.

    Adsorption, desorption and re-adsorption of proteins on solid surfaces

    Colloids Surf.

    (1992)
  • S.T. Kelly et al.

    The influence of protein aggregates on the fouling of microfiltration membranes during stirred cell filtration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.N. de Wit

    Thermal behaviour of bovine beta-lactoglobulin at temperatures up to 150 °C. A review

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • T. Steinhauer et al.

    Membrane fouling during ultra- and microfiltration of whey and whey proteins at different environmental conditions: the role of aggregated whey proteins as fouling initiators

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • T. Steinhauer et al.

    Temperature dependent membrane fouling during filtration of whey and whey proteins

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • T. Steinhauer et al.

    Structure of milk protein deposits formed by casein micelles and beta-lactoglobulin during frontal microfiltration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • A.D. Marshall et al.

    Influence of permeate flux on fouling during the microfiltration of beta-lactoglobulin solutions under cross-flow conditions

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1997)
  • D.M. Barbano et al.

    Characterization of milk proteins in ultrafiltration permeate

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1988)
  • G.S. Rice et al.

    Analysis of separation and fouling behaviour during nanofiltration of dairy ultrafiltration permeates

    Desalination

    (2009)
  • G. Rice et al.

    Fouling of NF membranes by dairy ultrafiltration permeates

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • J.G. Crespo et al.

    Membrane Processes in Separation and Purification

    (1994)
  • M. Cheryan

    Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook

    (1998)
  • P. Kumar et al.

    Perspective of membrane technology in dairy industry: a review, Asian-Australasian

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (2013)
  • P. Walstra et al.

    Dairy Technology: Principles of Milk Properties and Processes

    (1999)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Application of a pulsed crossflow to improve chemical cleaning efficiency in hollow fibre membranes following skim milk microfiltration

      2022, Separation and Purification Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Accordingly, milk protein fractionation by MF retaining casein micelles is characterised by a complex fouling situation within and on the membrane surface, requiring a thorough cleaning process. For the removal of protein fouling, NaOH is one of the most used cleaning agents [7,8]. Different cleaning effects prevail during the three phases of NaOH-cleaning of protein fouling.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text