Elsevier

Journal of Membrane Science

Volume 581, 1 July 2019, Pages 362-372
Journal of Membrane Science

Cross-linking of dehydrofluorinated PVDF membranes with thiol modified polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) and pure water flux analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.063Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dehydrofluorination was used to add alkenes onto PVDF.

  • Dehydrofluorinated PVDF/thiol modified POSS were cast into membranes using NIPS.

  • Membranes were cross-linked via UV-catalyzed thiol-ene addition.

  • Cross-linked PVDF/POSS membranes showed improved tensile mechanical properties.

  • Cross-linked PVDF/POSS membranes showed improved compaction resistance.

Abstract

Porous poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) membranes often undergo compaction in pressure driven water treatment, contributing to a reduction in water flux. Here, compaction resistance was tested by cross-linking dehydrofluorinated PVDF (PVDF with alkene functionality) with a synthesized thiol modified polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (thiol POSS) at 0–10 wt% via UV catalyzed thiol-ene addition. Analysis of these microfiltration membranes showed an increase in the Young's modulus from 36.60 ± 1.85 MPa (0 wt% thiol POSS) to 54.60 ± 1.97 MPa (10 wt% thiol POSS), correlating to improved mechanical properties. The pure water flux (PWF) of the membranes was found to increase with 1 wt% thiol POSS loading, then decreased with increasing thiol POSS loading up to 10 wt%, while BSA rejection decreased with 1 wt% loading of thiol POSS, then increased with thiol POSS loading thereafter. The cross-linked PVDF membrane with 10 wt% of thiol POSS was shown to possess the greatest compaction resistance, with the lowest pure water flux declines of 8.3 ± 2.04% (first pass, run 1) and 6.3 ± 2.37% (second pass, run 2) as compared to the membrane with no POSS additive at 26.3 ± 2.61 (first pass, run 1) and 12.8 ± 1.74 (second pass, run 2). The data showed that chemically cross-linking PVDF with POSS via thiol-ene addition has real potential to reduce compaction of PVDF water filtration membranes.

Introduction

The use of pressure driven water filtration membranes is a widely adopted technology, owing to its reasonable energy efficiency and robustness in removing contaminants [1,2]. However, often there is a decline in water permeance during water filtration over time [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. This decline is due to a combination of various factors, including adhesion of substances to the membrane surface and/or clogging of the membranes pores due to fouling [3], growth of biofilms on the membrane (biofouling) [4], and membrane compaction [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9]].

Membrane compaction occurs due to compression of the porous structure of the membrane from the pressure applied during the filtration. This constricts the pores and can cause the microporous layer within membranes to collapse, which reduces the rate at which water flows through the membrane [10,11]. Membrane compaction is particularly a problem for polymeric water filtration membranes, which are more easily compressed compared to inorganic membranes [12].

Poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) is a polymer commonly used as a material for polymeric water filtration membranes, as it possesses strong chemical resistance [13,14] as well as good mechanical properties [13,15]. Despite these desirable properties, compaction of PVDF membranes during pressure-driven filtration is still an issue. A common strategy to improve the mechanical properties of polymeric membranes (including PVDF membranes), as well as the compaction resistance of these membranes, is to incorporate inorganic fillers, such as metal oxide particles [[16], [17], [18]]. For example, Jun et al. [19] incorporated TiO2-carbon hybrid aerogel (TiO2single bondC) nanoparticles into flat sheet PVDF thus increasing the membranes Young's modulus from ∼29.7 MPa (0 wt% TiO2single bondC) to ∼46.1 MPa (0.5 wt% TiO2single bondC) and tensile strength from ∼1.47 MPa to ∼1.76 MPa with an increased % elongation at break from 10.55% to 20.83% [19]. Further, a decreased % flux decline of pure water was observed from ∼42% (0 wt% TiO2single bondC) to ∼14% (0.5 wt% TiO2single bondC).

Incorporation of SiO2 particles into PVDF membranes has been accomplished by Liang et al. [20] who employed hydrolysis and condensation of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) within membranes formed by thermally induced phase separation (TIPS). It was shown that with an increasing TEOS loading (between 0–20 wt%) in the casting solution an increased loading of silica particles was observed in the final membranes. This in turn increased the compaction resistance of the membranes [20]. The greatest compaction resistance was observed for the membrane with 20 wt% TEOS loading, changing the % flux decline from 83% (0 wt% SiO2 particles) to 22% (20 wt% SiO2).

There is, however, a large issue with incorporating inorganic fillers into polymeric membranes and this is poor dispersion, which results in large agglomerates forming and a reduction in membrane properties, such as reducing the mechanical stability of the membrane [[21], [22], [23], [24]]. To avoid poor dispersion, a class of organosilicon compounds called polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS), molecular formula [RSiO3/2]n have been used. A common form of POSS is a cage-like structure, where each silicon atom is bonded to other silicon atoms through Sisingle bondOsingle bondSi bridges (Fig. 1). Each silicon atom possesses an organic R-group which can be phenyl rings or alkyl chain of various lengths and functional groups, such as alcohols, amines, thiols, etc. [25]. As such the R-groups can allow for enhanced control of the dispersion of POSS in polymeric matrices [26,27], as well as allowing POSS to be covalently bound to polymers with the membrane matrix [28,29].

By adding POSS into polymers via blending [26,30] or covalently attaching as a pendant group [31] the polymer mechanical properties are greatly enhanced. Examples in literature on the incorporation of POSS into polymeric water filtration membranes have shown POSS to be capable of providing improvements to these membranes. Duan et al. [32] have used POSS bearing amine-groups to covalently bind into a polyamide (PA) layer on top of thin-film composite (TFC) PA reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. The amine-POSS additive was shown to effectively increase the hydrophilicity and water flux of TFC PA membranes, while still maintaining a similar salt rejection.

POSS-based coatings have also been applied to polysulfone (Psf) ultrafiltration membranes. These types of coatings are useful in improving antifouling resistance of the membranes. As an example, star polymer-POSS materials have been shown to reduce the % flux decline caused by fouling during the filtration of bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution and an oil-water emulsion [33,34].

The work of Worthley et al. [35] has demonstrated improvements in compaction resistance of cellulose acetate RO membranes. After blending POSS (0.5 wt%) into cellulose acetate RO membranes, examination of the membranes before and after filtration using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicated that the POSS modified membrane had a reduction in thickness of only 0.1%, whereas the membrane without POSS showed a reduction in thickness of 42%.

Here, we report for the first time PVDF water filtration membranes cross-linked using thiol modified POSS. This was accomplished by first using a non-nucleophilic base, 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), to produce dehydrofluorinated PVDF (d-PVDF). This was designed to effectively introduce alkene functionality on the PVDF backbone. Dehydrofluorination of PVDF has previously been used to change the surface properties of PVDF materials, either using dehydrofluorination alone [36,37] or followed by subsequent functionalization with other compounds [38,39]. In the second step, octa (3-mercaptopropyl) POSS (referred to as thiol POSS) was synthesized and used to cross-link with the alkene modified d-PVDF via UV-catalyzed thiol-ene addition reaction. The membranes tensile and water flux properties where tested at thiol POSS loadings of 0–10 wt%.

Section snippets

Materials

1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU, ≥ 99.0%), 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS) (95%), benzophenone (99%), bovine serum albumin (BSA, Fraction V, ≥ 96%, lyophilized powder), Chloroform-d1 (CDCl3, ≥99.8 atom%, containing 0.5 wt% of silver foil as a stabilizer), poly (vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP, PVP10), potassium chloride (KCl, 99.0–100.5%), sodium chloride (NaCl, ≥ 99.5%), tetrahydrofuran (THF) (anhydrous, ≥ 99.9%, containing 250 ppm of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol as inhibitor),

ATR-FTIR analysis of dehydrofluorinated PVDF (d-PVDF)

The normalized ATR-FTIR spectra of PVDF and d-PVDF (PVDF after reacting with DBU for 4 h) are shown in Fig. 4a and b, respectively.

The d-PVDF (Fig. 4b) shows the presence of additional bands at 2921 cm−1 and 2851 cm−1 due to Csingle bondH stretches. Additional bands are also observed as broad bands at ∼1650 cm−1 and ∼1530 cm−1 (see Fig. 4, inset arrows) which are attributed to the presence of unconjugated and conjugated alkenes, respectively [36,[41], [42], [43]]. This indicates that PVDF has been

Conclusions

In summary, cross-linked thiol POSS/PVDF membranes have been produced via UV catalyzed thiol-ene addition chemistry between thiol POSS and alkene modified PVDF (dehydrofluorinated). Cross-linked PVDF membranes were shown to have increased Young's moduli and reduced % strain at break, with little change in the tensile strength. Membranes with 5 wt% and 10 wt% thiol POSS were shown to have improved compaction resistance (as compared to the uncross-linked membrane). Overall, the cross-linked

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council, Australia, Grant No: FT130100211.

References (60)

  • F. Liu et al.

    Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • G.-d. Kang et al.

    Application and modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes – a review

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • J. Yin et al.

    Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • L.Y. Ng et al.

    Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • H.-Q. Liang et al.

    Thermally induced phase separation followed by in situ sol–gel process: a novel method for PVDF/SiO2 hybrid membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C.Y. Lai et al.

    Preparation and characterization of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nanoclay nanocomposite flat sheet membranes for abrasion resistance

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • C. Liao et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of low content of different SiO2 materials composite poly (vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • Y. Wei et al.

    Effect of TiO2 nanowire addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • L. Ricco et al.

    ε-Caprolactam polymerization in presence of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS)

    Polymer

    (2005)
  • J. Duan et al.

    Preparation and water desalination properties of POSS-polyamide nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • C.H. Worthley et al.

    A study into the effect of POSS nanoparticles on cellulose acetate membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • A. Bottino et al.

    Poly(vinylidene fluoride) with improved functionalization for membrane production

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • D.M. Brewis et al.

    Pretreatment of poly(vinyl fluoride) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) with potassium hydroxide

    Int. J. Adhesion Adhes.

    (1996)
  • C. Sun et al.

    Enhancing the performance of PVDF membranes by hydrophilic surface modification via amine treatment

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2017)
  • J.K. Sierke et al.

    High purity synthesis of a polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane modified with an antibacterial

    Inorg. Chem. Commun.

    (2015)
  • X. Zhao et al.

    Experimental and DFT investigation of surface degradation of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane in alkaline solution

    Surf. Sci.

    (2011)
  • S. Hajibabania et al.

    Relative impact of fouling and cleaning on PVDF membrane hydraulic performances

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2012)
  • D. Prządka et al.

    Novel hybrid polyurethane/POSS materials via bulk polymerization

    React. Funct. Polym.

    (2013)
  • Y. Jin et al.

    Preparation and characterization of poly (vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membrane with organic and inorganic porogens

    Desalination

    (2014)
  • S. Mohsenpour et al.

    Comparison of the membrane morphology based on the phase diagram using PVP as an organic additive and TiO2 as an inorganic additive

    Polymer

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text