Surface chemistry aspects of coal flotation in bore water
Introduction
In the 1930s, researchers in the former USSR found that naturally hydrophobic minerals such as coal could be floated in electrolyte solutions without use of collectors and frothers (Klassen and Mokrousov, 1963). Since then, particularly for coal, there have been many studies investigating this mechanism in seawater and saline waters (Yoon, 1982, Yoon and Sabey, 1989, Li and Somasundaran, 1993, Laskowski, 2001). These studies have brought several theories to explain the coal flotation in inorganic electrolyte solutions. For example, one theory proposes that the inorganic electrolytes prevent bubble coalescence resulting in a reduction of the bubble size and increased population, which in turn increases the encounter efficiency for the bubble-particle attachment and the froth stability, hence flotation efficiency (Yoon, 1982, Paulson and Pugh, 1996). However, this theory cannot explain the enhancement of coal flotation in a Hallimond tube, where a froth phase is essentially not present and coal flotation is primarily determined by the attachment interaction between air bubbles and coal particles (Harvey et al., 2002). Another theory proposes that the presence of electrolytes compresses the electrical double-layer (EDL) between bubbles and particles which corresponds to the reduction of zeta potential of both bubble and particle. Although there are some studies showing that the flotation recovery shows a maximum at minimum zeta potentials (Reay and Ratcliff, 1975, Fuerstenau et al., 1983, Yoon and Sabey, 1989), other studies showed that the flotation recovery has a maximum at pH values both above and below the isoelectric point (Celik and Somasundaran, 1980, Li and Somasundaran, 1993). A final theory proposes that the inorganic electrolytes destabilize the hydrated layers surrounding the coal and reduce the surface hydration of the coal (Klassen and Mokrousov, 1963). The destabilization makes the coal more hydrophobic and enhances the bubble-particle attachment. However, this hypothesis does not support experimental evidence that inorganic salts do not cause flotation of minerals which are not naturally hydrophobic.
The hypotheses discussed above have only partly explained the enhancement of coal flotation performance in salt solution. The aim of this paper is conduct a comprehensive study of the role of salt ions in enhancing coal flotation. In particular, the paper focuses on surface chemistry aspects of coal flotation in bore (ground) water which is frequently used as process water in several flotation plants in Australia (George, 1996).
Section snippets
Materials
The coal samples used in this study were obtained from Peak Down and Saraji, BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA), Australia. Peak Down coal is more hydrophobic than Saraji coal. The volatile matter for Peak Down and Saraji coal is less than 22% (BMA, 2007). Based on this data, these coals can be specified as low-volatile bituminous coal.
The bore water used for the flotation experiments was received from the MKO plant (BHP Billiton, Australia). The chemical analysis of bore water is presented
3.1.1. Flotation experiments
Flotation of coal was carried out in bore water as a function of particle size without a frother or collector. The results for Peak Down and Saraji coal are presented in Table 2, Table 3, respectively. As seen from the tables, the flotation of coal in bore water without any frother or collector is possible. These results also indicate that it takes only 1 min to recover 90% of the coal particles in bore water.
Fig. 3 shows the combustible recovery and ash content of the flotation products with
Conclusions
Results show that coal particles can float in bore water, which contains mostly Na+ and Mg2+, without using any frother or collector and produce a coal concentrate of 85%. The flotation results showed that 90% of the coal particles float within 1 min which suggests rapid flotation kinetics in the presence of salt ions. These results also indicated that a poor flotation response for particles coarser than 0.106 mm.
Coal flotation in bore water was also investigated to understand the surface
Acknowledgements
The Australian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged for financial support through a Discovery grant (AVN). BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) is gratefully acknowledged for funding the BMA Chair of Minerals Processing at the University of Queensland (AVN) and the coal samples (Mr Ian Brake and Mr Ben Cronin). BHP Billiton Nickel West (Perth, Australia) is acknowledged for providing the bore water samples. We are indebted to Mr Maung Aung Min from the JKMRC, the University of
References (23)
- et al.
Effect of pretreatments on flotation and electrokinetic properties of coal
Colloids Surf.
(1980) - et al.
Effect of surface functional groups on the flotation of coal
Colloids Surf.
(1983) - et al.
Influence of electrical double-layer interaction on coal flotation
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(2002) - et al.
The effect of surface treatment and slime coatings on ZnS hydrophobicity
Miner. Eng.
(2008) - et al.
Reversal of bubble charge in multivalent inorganic salt solutions — effect of magnesium
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1991) - et al.
Prediction of van der Waals interaction in bubble-particle attachment in flotation
Int. J. Miner. Process.
(2001) - et al.
A study of bubble-particle interaction using atomic force microscopy
Miner. Eng.
(2003) - et al.
Induction-time measurements at a particle bed
Int. J. Miner. Process.
(1989) - et al.
Part 2: wet fine particle concentration
- BMA...