Review article
Impact of pre-cooling therapy on the physical performance and functional capacity of multiple sclerosis patients: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.11.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pre-cooling therapy generates improvements in the multiple sclerosis patients’ functional capacity.

  • Pre-cooling methods are effective in reducing core temperature within 30 min to 1 h of cooling, while the reduction of core temperature varied from 0.37 to 1°C.

  • Pre-cooling therapy can prevent the symptom worsening due to increased body temperature in multiple sclerosis patients without causing adverse effects.

Abstract

Patients with multiple sclerosis experience many complications that gradually lead them to comorbidity and disability. Exercise could prevent and ameliorate the symptoms that comorbidity or inactivity generate. However, until recently it was suggested that multiple sclerosis patients should not participate in exercise training programs because these patients are characterized by thermoregulatory failure and the heat stress due to physical work could exacerbate the disease symptoms. Furthermore, taken into account that 60–80% of the multiple sclerosis patients present adverse clinical symptoms when their body temperature is increased (not only due to physical working but even when immerse in hot water or by exposure to infrared lamps or to the sun), the need for the development of treatment strategies to overcome the thermoregulatory problem in these patients is crucial. Given that pre-cooling has been proposed as an effective method, the aim of this systematic review is to discuss the current knowledge for the effects of cooling therapy on the functional capacity of multiple sclerosis patients. The relevant literature includes many articles, but only a handful of studies published thus far have used a cooling intervention in multiple sclerosis patients and have examined the effects of pre-cooling on functional capacity. These studies used active cooling methods, namely garments or other material that are cooled by circulating liquid through a tube, as well as passive, cooling methods. Passive cooling methods include passive cooling garments or other material namely garments that have ice or gel packs inside them. Overall, the results of all the studies analysed in this review demonstrated that pre-cooling therapy can prevent the symptom worsening due to increased body temperature in multiple sclerosis patients without causing adverse effects. Therefore, such strategies could serve as a complimentary therapeutic approach in multiple sclerosis patients.

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) (Schwid et al., 2003) is an autoimmune degenerative disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss (Schwid et al., 2003). The high global prevalence of MS, which is currently 33 patients per 100,000 adults (Browne et al., 2014), classifies it as one of the most frequent neurological diseases. Europe, with more than 30 patients per 100,000 adults, is among the regions with the highest prevalence in MS (Kurtzke, 2000). Overall, the disease prevalence appears to be particularly high in geographical areas where Caucasian people of Nordic origin live and in high-income countries (Koch-Henriksen and Sorensen, 2010). MS is considered a debilitating disease that reduces lifespan by around 7 to 10 years (Trapp and Nave, 2008). At the disease onset, most patients experience relapsing phases of exacerbated neurological impairments followed by partial or full remission (Trapp and Nave, 2008). However, a variable number of years after disease diagnosis MS patients can enter a secondary progressive phase where neurologic symptoms gradually worsen leading to disability (Lublin & Reingold, 1996). Studies, which have discussed the disability induced by MS (Confavreux et al., 2003, Huang et al., 2017), refer that the survival prognosis of MS patients is unpredictable and it is strongly associated with the patient’s age at the disease onset and the number of relapses that the patient will experience during the first five years.

MS affects mostly young individuals aged between 20 to 40 years and is the leading cause of morbidity and disability in young adults (Koch-Henriksen and Sorensen, 2010). Most MS patients experience multiple motor symptoms that induce gait difficulty and increase the risk for falls (Noseworthy et al., 2000) and other physical, cognitive and neurological symptoms that reduce their quality of life (Noseworthy et al., 2000). Exercise training may prevent or ameliorate these symptoms by preventing deconditioning and other comorbidities (Petajan and White, 1999, Sa, 2014). As some of the disabilities that MS patients experience e.g. muscle weakness and atrophy, could be considered as a consequence of inactivity and not a result of the disease per se (Dalgas, Stenager, & Ingemann-Hansen, 2008), it has been demonstrated that exercise can reduce inactivity-related impairments (Gallien et al., 2007). Therefore, it seems logical to speculate that exercise may induce clinically significant improvements in MS patients as well as benefits in their quality of life. However, the results of the studies regarding the effects of exercise training on MS patients report contradictory results. Specifically, aerobic exercise training has been proved to induce improvements in gait (Newman et al., 2007), in some functional abilities (Pilutti et al., 2011) and fatigue (Rampello et al., 2007). On the contrary, other authors did not observe exercise-induced improvements on the functional capacity in MS patients (Dalgas et al., 2008, Rasova et al., 2006, Schulz et al., 2004). Similarly, the results of the studies that applied exercise programs with resistance training were also contradictory (Cakt et al., 2010, Taylor et al., 2006).

MS patients for many years were advised not to participate in exercise training programs because there was a perception that the exercise could increase their body temperature and accordingly worsen the disease symptoms transiently (Freal et al., 1984, Heesen et al., 2006). Indeed, 60–80% of the MS patients present adverse clinical symptoms when their body temperature is increased not only due to physical work but also when immersed in hot water or during exposure to infrared radiation via the sun or electric lamps (Guthrie and Nelson, 1995). This phenomenon is characterized by visual impairment and paresis (Flensner et al., 2011) and was first described in 1890 by Wilhelm Uhthoff (Guthrie and Nelson, 1995). It can lead to exacerbation of MS patients’ neurological symptoms when body temperature is increased by as little as 0.5°C (Flensner et al., 2011, Davis et al., 1985) probably due to nerve conduction block in the demyelinated axonal segments (Davis et al., 1985). In this light, it is necessary to develop methods that allow MS patients to exercise by reducing their exercise-induced hyperthermia. The increased interest to address this problem is exemplified by the fact that a simple PubMed search using the search terms “multiple sclerosis” and “temperature” reveals a total of 507 articles that appear with increasing frequency through time reaching a peak of 17 articles/year during the past five years. Fig. 1 illustrates the evolution of publications using the aforementioned search terms clearly showing a growing interest in this field.

One of the main methods put forth to minimize the effects of exercise-induced hyperthermia in MS patients is pre-cooling therapy, which is based on the application of heat-removing material (vests/hoods/pads using phase-change material, liquid conditioning garments covering different parts of the body, etc.) on the skin surface (Flouris and Cheung, 2006, White et al., 2000, Goldberger, 1993). Typically, pre-cooling is used to reduce body temperature by 0.5–1.0°C (White et al., 2000, Reynolds et al., 2011) prior to the commencement of exercise and has been shown promising results (White et al., 2000, Reynolds et al., 2011). Nevertheless, to date the relevant literature has not been systematically analysed in order to critically assess the impact of pre-cooling on alleviating the symptoms of exercise-induced hyperthermia. In this article, we systematically evaluate the available research evidence to assess the impact of pre-cooling therapy on the physical performance and functional capacity of MS patients.

Section snippets

Literature search strategy

For this study the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines were used (Moher et al., 2009). A systematic search of literature was conducted using three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus). Studies from the year of their publication up to September 2018 were identified using the terms “cooling treatment” and “cooling therapy” combined with “functional ability”, “functional capacity”, “physical performance” and “multiple sclerosis

Results

The literature search identified 38 articles. 8 studies were excluded because they studied the effects of cooling on oxidative stress and fatigue in MS patients and thus were out of the scope of this review. From the remaining 30 studies, 24 studies did not meet the inclusion criteria for the following reasons: 4 were systematic reviews; 2 studies were written in German; 14 studies evaluated the effect of cooling on other factors (e.g. inflammation, opthalmoparesis, pain, etc.); 1 study

Analysis and discussion

This systematic review assessed the impact of pre-cooling therapy on the physical performance and functional capacity of MS patients. Our systematic search revealed that a total of six studies used pre-cooling treatments to alleviate the effects of exercise-induced hyperthermia in MS patients. In all the six studies the participants were characterized by thermo sensitivity and their score at the EDSS were between 2.5 to 6.0, which means that they need assistance (a cane or assistance of another

Concluding remarks

Overall, all the studies showed that pre-cooling therapy generates improvements in the MS patients’ functional capacity. According to Schwid et al (Schwid, Goodman, McDermott, Bever, & Cook, 2003), who assessed the reliability of the 25 FW test in MS patients, found that a change exceeding 20% on these tests on stable MS patients reflect a true change in individual function. However, in this case we have to take into account that in the three studies (Reynolds et al., 2011, Schwid et al., 2003,

Declaration of interest

None.

References (36)

  • T.C. Guthrie et al.

    Influence of temperature changes on multiple sclerosis: critical review of mechanisms and research potential

    J. Neurol. Sci.

    (1995)
  • A.E. Aubert et al.

    Heart rate variability in athletes

    Sports Med.

    (2003)
  • P. Browne

    Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity

    Neurology

    (2014)
  • B.D. Cakt

    Cycling progressive resistance training for people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study

    Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.

    (2010)
  • E. Capello

    Lowering body temperature with a cooling suit as symptomatic treatment for thermosensitive multiple sclerosis patients

    Ital. J. Neurol. Sci.

    (1995)
  • Cochrane Handbook For Systematic Reviews Of Interventions, Version 5.0.2.

    (2008)
  • C. Confavreux et al.

    Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process

    Brain

    (2003)
  • U. Dalgas et al.

    Multiple sclerosis and physical exercise: recommendations for the application of resistance-, endurance- and combined training

    Mult. Scler.

    (2008)
  • S.L. Davis

    Thermoregulation in multiple sclerosis

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1985)
  • H. Ding

    The method quality of cross-over studies involved in Cochrane systematic reviews

    PLoS One,

    (2015)
  • G. Flensner

    Sensitivity to heat in MS patients: a factor strongly influencing symptomology—an explorative survey

    BMC Neurol.

    (2011)
  • A.D. Flouris et al.

    Design and control optimization of microclimate liquid cooling systems underneath protective clothing

    Ann. Biomed. Eng.

    (2006)
  • J.E. Freal et al.

    Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis

    Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.

    (1984)
  • P. Gallien

    Physical training and multiple sclerosis

    Ann. Readapt. Med. Phys.

    (2007)
  • R. Goldberger

    Bridging the gap between patient and physician: reflections of a scientist-patient on outcomes in MS

    J. Neurol. Rehab.

    (1993)
  • D.A. Grahn et al.

    Cooling via one hand improves physical performance in heat-sensitive individuals with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study

    BMC Neurol.

    (2008)
  • C. Heesen

    Physical exercise in multiple sclerosis: supportive care or a putative disease-modifying treatment

    Expert Rev. Neurother.

    (2006)
  • W.J. Huang et al.

    Multiple sclerosis: pathology, diagnosis and treatments

    Exp. Ther. Med.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Exercise in the management of multiple sclerosis

      2022, Exercise to Prevent and Manage Chronic Disease Across the Lifespan
    • Non-drug Treatment Approaches and Neurorehabilitation

      2023, Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: Background, Clinic, Diagnostic, Therapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text