Synchrotron experiment and simulation studies of magnesium-steel interface manufactured by impact welding

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141023Get rights and content

Abstract

The effective weight reduction in the automotive industry by the wide adoption of lightweight magnesium (Mg) alloys demands high-quality joint between magnesium alloys and massively-used steels in order to wring the excess weight with strength and safety assurance. However, Mg-steel joint is difficult to achieve because there is no mutual solubility between magnesium and steel and huge disparity in physical properties. An impact-based welding method recently showed successful Mg-steel joining. In this work, the characteristics of Mg-steel interface joined by the impact welding method were investigated. Synchrotron high-energy X-ray computed tomography and diffraction were applied to characterize the microstructure across Mg-steel interface. Results revealed a deposit layer formed at the joint interface where Fe-rich particles spread deep into the Mg matrix. High-resolution 3D morphology of Mg-steel interface demonstrated the trapped pores and cracks inside the deposit layer. The formation of the deposit layer and the void/cracking evolution were analyzed by using finite element models. These findings provide insights into the immiscible Mg-steel joining process.

Introduction

Weight reduction by using lightweight alloys to mitigate the commonly-used heavy steel parts plays a vital role in the modern automotive industry for the long-standing pursuit of environmentally-friendly vehicles with fuel and cost efficiencies [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. Magnesium (Mg) and aluminum alloys are gradually applied by engineers to wring the excess weight, because these alloys have much higher specific strength as compared to steel that is pervasively adopted in the automotive applications owing to the economic and massive productions. Mg alloys are 33% lighter than aluminum alloys while keeping a similar strength and have greater potential for wide adoption in the vehicle industry. Joining Mg to steel has been increasingly desired for high-strength and low-weight products [[6], [7], [8]]. However, direct joining between Mg and steel is challenging because it is difficult to form a bonded Mg-Steel interface [9,10]. As the Mg and iron (Fe) binary phase diagram shows, Mg and Fe are almost immiscible even up to a high temperature (1900K) and no intermetallic phases form [7]; furthermore, there is a huge difference in melting temperature between Fe (1812 K) and Mg (922 K). Thus, the immiscible nature in liquid state and mismatch of thermal expansion between Fe and Mg make direct Mg-steel joints unfeasible and unsustainable for conventional fusion welding processes.

Interlayer of mutual diffusers between Mg and steel base alloys has been deployed to facilitate the effective Mg-steel joining interface. Thin layer of Zn [11,12], Al [6], Cu [13,14], Ni [15,16], and Sn [17,18] was typically sandwiched between Mg and steel base alloys, melted to liquid regime during the joining process, and had reaction with Mg alloy or solid solution in steel alloy. Intermetallic compound phases, especially from reaction with Mg alloy due to the nature of low melting temperature, were usually found in the interlayer or coating layer and contributed to the formation of a bonding interface. In the ultrasonic spot welding of Mg to Zn-coated steel, a thin layer of Mg–Zn intermetallic compounds was present at the Mg side [12] while a 450-nm-thick layer of Fe3Al intermetallic compound was found on the steel surface [11]. Intermetallic compound phases of Mg2X (X = Cu, Ni, Sn) were also reported in Mg-steel welds by using arc spot welding, ultrasonic welding and laser tungsten inert gas welding methods. However, the formation of the intermetallic compound phase in the interfacial reaction process during joining is difficult to control and tune precisely, but significantly affects the maximum joint strength. Because most intermetallic compound phases are brittle and lead to a weak joint [19]. Hence, joining Mg to steel without interlayer or coating needs to be investigated.

A direct joint between Mg alloy AZ31 to uncoated high-strength steel DP590 has been obtained recently by using vaporizing foil actuator welding (VFAW) method [20]. VFAW is an impact-based method for joining dissimilar materials with disparate properties, which utilized the rapidly expanding plasma gas generated from vaporizing an aluminum foil to accelerate the flyer sheet and cause a high-velocity impact towards the target. After the VFAW processing, bonding Mg-steel interface is successfully achieved and no Al- or Zn- based intermetallic layer at the AZ31-bare steel VFAW joint is observed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurement. Further volumetric characterization of microstructure across the Mg-steel interface needs to be addressed thoroughly.

Therefore, in this paper, high-resolution synchrotron X-ray computed tomography and high-energy diffraction methods, in combination with finite element (FE) analysis, were applied to analyze the direct bonding formation mechanism between the Mg alloy and bare steel in the VFAW process. Interestingly, a deposit layer at the Mg-steel interface was revealed as active transition layer to join the disparate layers of Mg side and steel side. Pores and cracks are prevailingly found in the deposit layer. And the phase structure of the deposit layer is mixed with Mg and Fe phases. Finite element analysis elucidated that the localized melting of thin Mg layer on the steel side due to severe plastic deformation facilitates the formation of pores and cracks. The formation of Mg-steel joining interface was discussed based on the synchrotron experiment and FE simulation results.

Section snippets

Mg–Fe joint

The joining between a 1.8 mm thick Mg alloy AZ31 sheet to a 0.8 mm thick uncoated dual-phase DP590 steel was successfully fabricated by the vaporizing foil actuator welding (VFAW) process at the Impulse Manufacturing Laboratory in the Ohio State University [20]. For the completeness of this paper, the VFAW process is briefly summarized here. In the experiment setup, an aluminum foil, which was 10 mm × 10 mm large and 0.076 mm thick, was placed between the anvil (backing block) and the center of

Microstructure

The typical morphology of Mg-steel joint observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is shown in Fig. 2. Magnesium AZ31 flyer (Mg side) is firmly bonded to the concave-shape steel DP590 target (steel side) from the longitudinal cross-section. Interestingly, a distinct layer from magnesium side is deposited to the steel side as a transition layer. Surprisingly, abundant pores and cracks are prevailingly seen in the deposit layer. To further investigate the microstructure of the deposit layer,

Finite element analysis

The formation of the deposit interlayer observed at the Mg-steel interface and resultant cracking behavior are analyzed in this section with the aid of finite element (FE) modeling for AZ31-DP590 VFAW process. The original FE model is adopted from Cheng et al. [20], and based on an Eulerian framework of thermal-mechanical FE formulation by using commercial software ABAQUS. The FE model captures the evolution of temperature and mechanical fields from the impact welding process between the flyer

Discussion

The deposit layer found in the SEM and tomography measurements acts as the transition zone between the Mg side and the steel side, and contributes to the firm joining of the Mg-steel interface. The formation of the deposit layer might result from the localized Mg melting, which is predicted in the FE simulation. Because there is no solubility between Mg and Fe elements, it's difficult to form intermetallic phases in the deposit layer, which is verified by the diffraction profiles in Fig. 9. But

Conclusions

In summary, the Mg-steel interface manufactured by VFAW method was experimentally characterized by synchrotron X-ray computed tomography and diffraction. A deposit interlayer of a few hundred of micrometers in thickness was found between Mg and steel base alloys and contributed to the dissimilar metal joining. This deposit interlayer had a major component of Mg, decorated with abundant Fe particles, pores and cracks. The inter-mixing with Mg and Fe phases was discerned in the deposit

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Lianghua Xiong: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing - review & editing. Jiahao Cheng: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing - review & editing. Andrew Chihpin Chuang: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis. Xiaohua Hu: Methodology, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources. Xin Sun: Funding acquisition, Project administration. Dileep Singh: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Vehicle Technologies Office, Joining Core Program, managed by Ms. Sarah Kleinbaum, at Argonne National Laboratory operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 by the UChicago Argonne, LLC. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. Use of the Center for Nanoscale Materials, an Office of Science user

References (31)

  • G. Casalino et al.

    Laser offset welding of AZ31B magnesium alloy to 316 stainless steel

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2017)
  • T. Wang et al.

    A review of Technologies for welding magnesium alloys to steels

    Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol.

    (2020)
  • G. Song et al.

    A review of bonding immiscible Mg/Steel dissimilar metals

    Materials

    (2018)
  • M. Wahba et al.

    Laser welding of AZ31B magnesium alloy to Zn-coated steel

    Mater. Des.

    (2012)
  • V.K. Patel et al.

    Formation of zinc interlayer texture during dissimilar ultrasonic spot welding of magnesium and high strength low alloy steel

    Mater. Des.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Influence of surface roughness on the transient interfacial phenomena in laser impact welding

      2022, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Impact welding offers versatility in joining metallic components fabricated from alloys of differing thermomechanical properties (e.g., melting temperature), thus avoiding the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds, porosities, or micro cracks that often compromise weld quality between dissimilar materials when using fusion methods [3,4]. Additionally, the process has been shown capable of forming joints between immiscible metallic materials, such as magnesium and steel alloys [5]. Various impact welding methods have been developed for joining metallic parts of different scales and geometric configurations, and such methods are generally categorized according to their means of flyer propulsion, which can include the use of pressurized gases, explosives, magnetic discharge, or vaporizing foils [1,6].

    • Influence of laser-Sn powder coupling on microstructure and mechanical properties of fusion welded AZ31B-alloy to DP590-steel

      2022, Optics and Laser Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      So far, researchers have applied various welding methods for joining magnesium alloy to steel, such as laser welding [3,4], hybrid laser and arc welding [5] and resistance spot welding(RSW) [6]. As for solid state connection, friction stir welding(FSW) [7], ultrasonic spot welding(USW) [8] and impact weld [9] have been used. Furthermore, adding various interlayers [10–12] can overcome the metallurgical immiscibility between magnesium and steel.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text