Review article
Blood biomarkers in paediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • GFAP is a good candidate for future research in paediatric mTBI, especially in prognostic and monitoring context.

  • UCH-L1 seems to be the most consistent and thus promising biomarker in the diagnostic context in mTBI in children.

  • Future research will require more uniform study design and methodological approaches.

Abstract

Objective

To summarize all current studies focusing on blood biomarkers in paediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and to outline the possible use of blood biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring purposes within this setting.

Methods

A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases.

Results

A total of 21 studies were included in the review, encompassing a total of 14 different biomarkers. Seventeen (81%) of these studies found a significant association between biomarker concentration and mTBI characteristics, however results from studies to date are diverse and at times conflicting.

Conclusion

GFAP appears to be a promising blood biomarker for the prognosis and monitoring of mTBI, whereas UCH-L1 appears more promising at mTBI diagnosis. Despite this, the overall heterogeneity in assessed biomarkers, study design and measurement tools has made drawing specific conclusions challenging. Future research will require more uniform study design and methodological approaches to allow for the comparison, corroboration and validation of blood biomarkers within the context of paediatric mTBI.

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as “an alteration in brain function, or other evidence of brain pathology, caused by an external force” (Menon et al., 2010). As the name suggests, mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is the mildest and yet arguably most common form of TBI (Crowe et al., 2009; Meehan and Mannix, 2010). The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) defines mTBI as a blow to the head resulting in at least one of the following immediate symptoms: a period of loss of consciousness ≤30 min, post-traumatic amnesia ≤24 h, any alteration in mental state at the time of the accident, focal neurological deficits (transient/not transient) or a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS - providing an objective measure of the conscious state of a person) score of 13–15 (Kay et al., 1993; Saatman et al., 2008). One out of every 220 (0.5%) paediatric patients admitted to the emergency department within the United States is diagnosed with a mTBI, totalling approximately 144,000 patients per year on a national level and 18% of all paediatric head injury patients (Meehan and Mannix, 2010).

An audit of children who attended the Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH), Melbourne, Australia in 2004 for a HI found that 90% of the patients were classified as having a mTBI (Crowe et al., 2009). In fact, in Australia, 20% of 10 year olds (approximately 51,000 children annually) will have suffered at least one head injury requiring medical treatment (Harmon et al., 2013). As these studies do not account for individuals who did not receive medical care, it can be assumed that in reality the occurrence of mTBI is much higher. While most children improve within 1 week following a mTBI, there is growing consensus that post-mTBI symptoms can persist for up to a month in approximately 30% of patients (Barlow et al., 2010; Eisenberg et al., 2014). These prolonged symptoms, which may include headaches, dizziness, difficulties concentrating, irritability, cognitive/emotional impairments, and behavioural difficulties, have been termed persistent (Zemek et al., 2013) or Post Concussion Symptoms (PCS). If left unchecked, these predominantly non-specific symptoms have the potential to develop into significant cognitive, academic and emotional-behavioural difficulties that may impact a child’s overall quality of life.

Little is known about the predictive factors and mechanism of PCS in children. This systematic review aims to summarize the studies that have assessed blood biomarkers within the setting of paediatric mTBI and to determine the potential of blood biomarkers as a diagnostic, prognostic and/or monitoring tool.

Section snippets

Methods

The terms “concussion” and “mild traumatic brain injury” are often used synonymously. Various diagnostic criteria overlap significantly (e.g., the Concussion in Sport Group consensus statement versus the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine criteria for mild traumatic brain injury), which leads to inconsistent terminology and methodological heterogeneity. With that in mind, for the purpose of this review, the terms “concussion” and “mild traumatic brain injury” will be used

Results

From the excluded studies, 12 studies (27.3%) had no separate results for children, despite including children within their sample. A total of 21 studies were identified for inclusion in this review. These studies focused on blood biomarkers assessed in paediatric mTBI, in accordance with the ACRM criteria. Of the 21 studies, 19 (90.5%) included children aged less than 18 years and two (9.5%) included children up to 21 years. The biomarker S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) was assessed in

Discussion

This systematic review included 21 papers, reporting on a total of 14 different biomarkers. The biomarkers that were studied most frequently were S100B, GFAP, and UCH-L1. S100B is a small calcium-binding protein involved in a range of cellular processes with particular abundance in glial and neural cells of the central nervous system (CNS). S100B has been shown to be elevated in several neurological conditions and is a general marker of brain injury (Olsson et al., 2011). GFAP is an

Conclusion

Despite the fact that mTBI in children involves small biological changes, research focusing on more severe brain injuries and on adults suggests that there is great potential for blood biomarkers to be used in assessing paediatric mTBI, especially for prognostic and monitoring purposes. We recommend that research within this field focus on discovering and validating new biomarker associations. Specifically, future studies should strive to present results in a way that discriminates between TBI

References (40)

  • K.M. Barlow et al.

    Epidemiology of postconcussion syndrome in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury

    Pediatrics

    (2010)
  • R.P. Berger et al.

    Serum S100B concentrations are increased after closed head injury in children: a preliminary study

    J. Neurotrauma

    (2002)
  • R.P. Berger et al.

    Serum concentrations of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and alphaII-spectrin breakdown product 145 kDa correlate with outcome after pediatric TBI

    J. Neurotrauma

    (2012)
  • D. Bouvier et al.

    Serum S100B determination in the management of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury

    Clin. Chem.

    (2012)
  • C. Castellani et al.

    Neuroprotein s-100B - A useful parameter in paediatric patients with mild traumatic brain injury? acta paediatrica

    Int. J. Paediatr.

    (2009)
  • L. Crowe et al.

    The epidemiology of paediatric head injuries: data from a referral centre in Victoria, Australia

    J. Paediatr. Child Health

    (2009)
  • M. Daley et al.

    Metabolomics profiling of concussion in adolescent male hockey players: a novel diagnostic method

    Metabolomics

    (2016)
  • M.A. Eisenberg et al.

    Duration and course of post-concussive symptoms

    Pediatrics

    (2014)
  • C. Geyer et al.

    Diagnostic value of S100B and neuron-specific enolase in mild pediatric traumatic brain injury

    J. Neurosurg. Pediatr.

    (2009)
  • K.G. Harmon et al.

    American medical society for sports medicine position statement: concussion in sport

    Clin. J. Sport Med.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text