Full Length Article
Exploration of methods to remove implanted 210Pb and 210Po contamination from silicon surfaces

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.168008Get rights and content

Abstract

Radioactive contaminants on the surfaces of detector components can be a problematic source of background events for physics experiments searching for rare processes. Exposure to radon is a specific concern because it can result in the relatively long-lived 210Pb (and progeny) being implanted to significant subsurface depths such that removal is challenging. In this article we present results from a broad exploration of cleaning treatments to remove implanted 210Pb and 210Po contamination from silicon, which is a material frequently used in rare-events searches. We demonstrate for the first time that heat treatments (“baking”) can effectively mitigate such surface contamination, with a 1200 °C bake resulting in a 973+2% reduction. We also report results using wet-chemistry and plasma-based methods, which show that etching can be highly effective provided the etch depth is sufficiently aggressive. Our survey of cleaning methods suggests consideration of multiple approaches during the different phases of detector construction to enable greater flexibility for efficient removal of 210Pb and 210Po surface contamination.

Introduction

Radon contamination requires a dedicated consideration for detectors that require low backgrounds from radioactivity to search for rare physics processes such as interactions from dark matter and neutrinoless double-beta decay (see, e.g., Refs. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]). Radon can manifest as a background in several ways. In this article, we focus on the long-lived surface contamination present on detector components exposed to radon, e.g., during fabrication and assembly. Specifically, when 222Rn decays in air, its progeny plate onto surfaces where the relatively prompt alpha decays of 218Po and 214Po can implant 210Pb contamination to subsurface depths of many tens of nanometers [7], [8], [9]. The long 22 year half-life of 210Pb [10] and its decay chain induce multiple types of background radiation – x-rays, betas, alphas, recoiling ions – for the full duration of detector operations.

There are two primary mitigation approaches: use of radon-reduced environments to prevent radon exposure and surface cleaning to remove 210Pb and its progeny. To achieve sufficiently low radon levels, the former can require significant infrastructure such as a dedicated low-radon cleanroom (as in Refs. [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]). When practical, simple cleaning methods can be inexpensive but may be only partially effective because a significant fraction of the contamination is too deeply implanted to be easily removed. Exploration of more effective cleaning treatments is motivated by a need for cost-effective options for efficient removal of surface contaminants.

Methods for removal of radon-progeny surface contamination have been explored for a variety of materials and reported in the literature. Cleaning of copper surfaces has been studied extensively, with methods ranging from relatively simple etching [8], [17], [18], [19], [20] to more complicated multi-step procedures [21]. Other investigations have considered materials such as polymers [7], [22], [23], stainless steel [8], [18], [24], semiconductor crystals [18], [25], [26], [27], and glass [28], using a variety of cleaning techniques such as leaching, etching, and electropolishing. Notably, silicon is a detector material often used in rare-event experiments [1], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. There are many reports on surface treatments to advance fabrication of silicon-based devices (e.g., as in Refs. [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]). However, there appear to be few studies focused on removal of radioactive contaminants from silicon surfaces, such as the one in Ref. [27] which specifically targeted crystal sidewalls.

In this article, we report results to remove implanted 210Pb and 210Po from silicon surfaces using a variety of methods. Recognizing that there may be opportunities for surface treatments during different stages of detector fabrication (for other materials as well as silicon), we performed a general exploration using a broad range of processes, including heat treatments, wet chemistry, and plasma etching. The objective is to identify a suite of cleaning options to enable greater flexibility to effectively mitigate radon-progeny surface contamination. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes our overall approach, including our preparation of 210Pb-implanted samples in Section 2.1 and our surface-contamination measurement and analysis methods in Section 2.2. Section 3 motivates the different surface treatments, describes the specific procedures that we used, and presents our 210Pb and 210Po removal results. Finally, we summarize and discuss our results in Section 4.

Section snippets

Sample preparation

As shown in Fig. 1, we prepared an assortment of silicon samples from a pair of single-side polished wafers, each originally 100 mm in diameter and 500μm thick. The silicon was grown via the float-zone method, resulting in high purity characterized by a resistivity greater than 10 kΩ cm. The square-shaped samples were diced ‘by hand’ to provide three approximate sizes: 1×1,2×2, and 3 × 3 cm2. This range of sizes enabled flexibility to explore a variety of surface treatment methods, while also

Heat treatments

The use of heat treatments (or “baking”) as a low-background method for removal of radioactive contaminants is generally unexplored in the literature. Studies of hydrogen diffusion in germanium and silicon [43], [44], [45], [46] suggest that baking may be an effective mitigation technique for tritium. Also considering the high melting point of silicon relative to Pb, Bi, and Po (>1000 °C difference) motivated us to investigate baking as a cleaning method for our samples. The potential for

Summary

In this article, we document our exploration of a variety of mitigation methods to reduce a source of background events that is a key concern for many rare-event searches: implanted 210Pb surface contamination resulting from radon exposure. Considering the many materials for which such studies are already reported in the literature, we focused our efforts on silicon because it is a substrate used in several experiments [1], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34] and there are surprisingly few prior

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge technical assistance from several staff at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL): Shannon Morley for assistance with preparation of the silicon samples, Brian Glasgow and Grant Spitler for operation of the alpha counters, Derek Cutforth for baking of sample 1L in the vertical muffle furnace, and Ben Loer for useful feedback on this manuscript.

This work was funded by PNNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) funds under the Nuclear Physics,

References (50)

  • HuY. et al.

    Carbon induced galvanic etching of silicon in aerated HF/H2O vapor

    Corros. Sci.

    (2019)
  • SinghS. et al.

    Nuclear data sheets for A = 222

    Nucl. Data Sheets

    (2011)
  • KondevF.G.

    Nuclear data sheets for A = 206

    Nucl. Data Sheets

    (2008)
  • FrankR.C. et al.

    The diffusion of hydrogen in single-crystal germanium

    J. Phys. Chem. Solids

    (1960)
  • IchimiyaT. et al.

    On solubility and diffusion coefficient of tritium in single crystals of silicon

    Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1968)
  • JastramA. et al.

    Cryogenic dark matter search detector fabrication process and recent improvements

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods A

    (2015)

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods A

    (2016)
  • AgneseR.

    (SuperCDMS), Projected sensitivity of the SuperCDMS SNOLAB experiment

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2017)
  • AalsethC.E.

    (DarkSide-20k), DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS

    Eur. Phys. J. Plus

    (2018)
  • AkeribD.S.

    (LZ), the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) radioactivity and cleanliness control programs

    Eur. Phys. J. C

    (2020)
  • BenatoG.

    Radon mitigation during the installation of the CUORE 0νββ decay detector

    JINST

    (2018)
  • AlbertJ.B.

    (nEXO), Sensitivity and discovery potential of nEXO to neutrinoless double beta decay

    Phys. Rev. C

    (2018)
  • CattadoriC.M. et al.

    GERDA and LEGEND: Probing the neutrino nature and mass at 100 mev and beyond

    Universe

    (2021)
  • GuiseppeV.E. et al.

    A review and outlook for the removal of radon-generated Po-210 surface contamination

    AIP Conf. Proc.

    (2018)
  • StreetJ. et al.

    Radon mitigation for the SuperCDMS SNOLAB dark matter experiment

    AIP Conf. Proc.

    (2018)
  • GrantD. et al.

    Low radon cleanroom at the university of Alberta

    AIP Conf. Proc.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Now at Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York 10065, USA.

    View full text