Elsevier

Ore Geology Reviews

Volume 86, June 2017, Pages 924-938
Ore Geology Reviews

The world's by-product and critical metal resources part I: Uncertainties, current reporting practices, implications and grounds for optimism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.05.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Detailed review of mineral resource reporting for by-product and critical metals

  • Lack of reporting causes misunderstanding of probable resources/potential supply

  • Deposits reporting critical metals show grounds for added value

  • Hybrid methods are developed for more robust estimates of selected critical metals

  • Optimistic technical basis regarding critical metals and their long-term resources

Abstract

Many of the metals extracted as by-products and rated as ‘critical’ are vital to important modern technologies but are seldom reported as extractable commodities by the mining industry. This creates numerous uncertainties and challenges in estimating the global resources of these metals; here we outline the current approaches (or lack thereof) used in resource reporting and identify and discuss the uncertainties surrounding critical co- and by-product reporting in detail. We present a review of ore reserve and mineral resource reporting in the mining industry, including the identification of various methods by which resource accounts have been constructed, a discussion of examples and differences between countries, states and organisations that conduct these assessments, and a discussion of the various ways in which these resource data have been interpreted. This is followed by a series of case studies that document and discuss the reporting of selected critical metals that suggest that the lack of reporting is dominantly as a result of the perceived or actual low monetary value of by-products at the mine site rather than as a result of any lack of these metals, indicating that different types of uncertainties can arise in estimating the global resources of these critical commodities.

This paper also addresses (and continues in parts II and III) the numerous issues and uncertainties identified in this study by outlining approaches and alternative data sources that can be used to develop more comprehensive assessments of critical metal resources from deposit to global levels. The hybrid methodologies proposed in this paper provide reasons for some optimism in that by-product and critical metal resources can still be identified to a reasonable degree of accuracy, and these resources are likely to be sufficient to meet demand for some decades. However, there is still a strong case for improved reporting of by-products and critical metals in mineral deposits to assist in these efforts and to clarify the true global position in terms of the future security of supply of co- and by-product metals, invariably including the critical or e-tech metals.

Introduction

There are a wide range of factors that a potential mining company needs to consider and carefully assess during the determination of whether (or not) a particular mineral or metal is economically worth the effort of extracting it from the earth in some manner (e.g. Edwards, 2001). At a basic level, this includes finding a body of material enriched in one or more elements or minerals that are mineable (by open cut, underground or in situ extraction methods), processable into a saleable product (e.g. concentrate or metal), profitable (i.e. markets must demand the product at a price greater than the costs of mining; unless mining for other strategic reasons such as national defence or socio-political goals), and which meet the demands of a range of other potential technical, environmental, financial, governance and social factors. Over time, particularly in the last 50 years, the mining industry has developed considerable technical capacity and experience in such assessments, and the requirements for these are now typically enshrined in codes, instruments or guidelines by law, regulation or good industry practice.

In general terms, mining uses the concepts of ore reserves and mineral resources to assess the potential for exploiting a mineral deposit – and for the major metals and minerals, this is now routine and straightforward thanks to the adoption of formal codes and guidelines. There are, however, issues when it comes to metals which are not normally the target of mining projects. For example, indium (In1) is often associated with zinc (Zn) deposits and typically deports to Zn concentrates, with the indium potentially recoverable at a Zn refinery (if they have an indium recovery circuit; e.g. Werner et al., 2015) – yet to a mine, the value of indium is typically negligible to very small and is (in the main) not recognised in prices paid for Zn concentrates. In this case, indium is often termed a ‘companion metal’, as it occurs with Zn but is not the primary metal of interest to a mining company (e.g. Nassar et al., 2015). Many of the metals increasingly used in modern technology are companion metals, including indium, gallium (Ga), tellurium (Te), germanium (Ge), selenium (Se), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), hafnium (Hf), rhenium (Re), and the rare earth elements (REEs, more commonly referred to as rare earth oxides or REOs), amongst others. Furthermore, current supply or resources of many of the companion metals are concentrated in just a few countries (e.g. indium, REOs and China; Re and Chile), leading to concerns over security of supply to continue to support modern civilian and military technologies – with such metals commonly referred to as ‘critical metals’. In the mining industry, however, there is very little data reported on such companion or critical metals in ore reserves, mineral resources or mine production statistics – leading to false concerns or confusion between current supply and future supply potential.

Here, we provide a background to ore reserve and mineral resource reporting in the mining industry, review different sources of such estimates and methods of compiling national or global assessments, and present resource-reserve data for various deposits that do report critical metal data before finally discussing the implications overall for more robust global estimates of the resources-reserves of critical metals. Rather than adopt a pessimistic outlook, we highlight the many technical grounds for optimism for adequate supply of critical minerals and metals for some decades. The following sections form the theoretical background to a multi-part series of studies examining the global resources of by-product and critical metals. In part II (Werner et al., under review a), we develop a methodology to estimate by-product/critical metal resources which explicitly overcomes the uncertainties identified in this study that is then demonstrated in greater detail for the case of indium in part III (Werner et al., under review b).

Section snippets

Background and rationale

In general, the primary concepts to assess the potential exploitation of a mineral deposit are ore reserves and mineral resources, as outlined in codes or instruments such as Australia's Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code (AusIMM et al., 2012), South Africa's Mineral Resource Code (SAMREC; SAMRCWG, 2009), Canada's National Instrument 43-101 (aka NI43-101; OSC, 2011), and the associated CIM2 Code (CIM, 2014), or the

Different sources, different methods

The uncertainties inherent in the assessment of national mineral resources and subsequent government policy on exporting and/or stockpiling of minerals are exemplified by the Australian Government's policy on iron (Fe) ore between 1938 and 1960. The Australian government in 1938 decided to embargo the export of Fe ore for two reasons; firstly, as a strategic decision to prevent the development of known Australian Fe ore deposits by the Japanese for export to Japan in the tense period leading up

Case studies: demonstrating different types of uncertainties

This section focuses on a series of case studies that outline the differing types of uncertainties in resource reporting, building on the information presented above.

Critical metals: assessing global resources-reserves

As highlighted already, one of the prime reasons why many critical metals have poor estimates of global reserves and resources is that they are typically not reported in resources-reserves and mine production by mining companies – with many such metals simply extracted at a smelter or refinery with even less publicly reported data (e.g. indium, Se, Cd, Te, Re, etc). This in turn means that it is unclear whether the concerns over the security of supply of these metals (e.g. Naden, 2012) is

Discussion and implications

It is clear that a lack of reporting of the numerous critical metals has led to a paucity of data relating to the global resources of these metals and beyond. This is not a reflection of exploration success (or lack thereof), but rather the historical and present-day economics of critical metal extraction and processing. The fact that these metals are often not the core business of mining companies means that these companies are not incentivised to report or even examine these commodities which

Conclusions

This paper documents and discusses numerous factors which commonly lead to by-products and critical metals not being reported as a potential commodity in the mining industry, and the implications of this lack of reporting. In particular, the lesser economic value of these metals reduces their chances of being extracted, despite their geological presence and potential strategic or technological value. Under the mineral resource reporting codes commonly employed in the mining industry, there are

Acknowledgements

SMJ acknowledges fruitful discussion with Ahmad Saleem of MMG Ltd. on this topic. This work is supported by the Wealth From Waste Research Collaboration Cluster, a CSIRO-university funded joint collaboration cluster between CSIRO Mineral Resources, CSIRO Manufacturing, University Technology Sydney, Monash University, University of Queensland, Swinburne University and Yale University.

References (117)

  • B.H. Robinson

    E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2009)
  • E. Rombach et al.

    Chapter 10 — Recycling of Rare Metals

  • AAS

    Searching the Deep Earth — A Vision for Exploration Geoscience in Australia

    (2012)
  • Alkane

    Media Release – Dubbo Zirconia Project: FEED Completion Highlights Robust Project Economics

    (2015)
  • C.S. Anderson

    2013 Minerals Yearbook – Selenium and Tellurium (Advance Release)

    (2015)
  • Anonymous

    Zinc

    (2008)
  • J.E. Athey et al.

    Alaska's Mineral Industry, 2012

  • AusIMM et al.

    Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves: The JORC Code

    (2012)
  • U. Bardi

    Extracted: How the Quest for Mineral Wealth Is Plundering the Planet

    (2014)
  • BGS

    Risk List 2012: An Update to the Supply Risk for Elements or Element Groups That are of Economic Value

    (2012)
  • BGS

    Risk List 2015 — Current Supply Risk for Chemical Elements or Element Groups Which are of Economic Value

    (2015)
  • BHPB

    Olympic Dam Expansion — Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement 2011

    (2011)
  • F.P. Bierlein et al.

    New constraints on the polychronous nature of the giant Muruntau gold deposit from wall-rock alteration and ore paragenetic studies

    Aust. J. Earth Sci.

    (2010)
  • J.G. Blockley et al.

    Geological Aspects of Australian Iron Ore Discovery and Development

  • J.L. Bloodhurst et al.

    Understanding element distribution during primary metal production

    Miner. Process. Ext. Metall.

    (2007)
  • A. Bloodworth

    Painful extractions: Andrew Bloodworth weighs up a study revealing the high cost of our technology-driven lust for rare metals

    Nature

    (2015)
  • Boliden

    Boliden Annual Report 2015

    (2015)
  • W.-Q. Chen et al.

    Anthropogenic cycles of the elements: a critical review

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • T.T. Chen et al.

    Mineralogy and Characteristics That Affect Recoveries of Metals and Trace Elements from the Ore at Heath Steele Mines, New Brunswick

    CIM Bull.

    (1980)
  • CIM

    CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

    (2014)
  • CMSA

    Facts and Figures 2012

    (2013)
  • CMSA var. Facts and Figures. Johannesburg, South Africa: Chamber of Mines of South Africa...
  • P.C.F. Crowson

    Mineral reserves and future minerals availability

    Miner. Econ.

    (2011)
  • A. Drake

    Canadian Reserves of Selected Major Metals and Recent Production Decisions

    (2012)
  • W.P.C. Duyvesteyn et al.

    Scandium: A Review of the Element, its Characteristics, and Current and Emerging Commercial Applications

    (2014)
  • EC

    Critical Raw Materials for the EU — Report of the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Defining Critical Raw Materials

    (2014)
  • A.C. Edwards

    Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimation — The AusIMM Guide to Good Practice

  • ELMC

    Enhanced Landfill Mining — Closing the Circle

    (2012)
  • R.D. Fraser et al.

    Form 43-101 Technical Report on the Anna Lake Uranium Project, Central Mineral Belt, Labrador, Canada

    (2009)
  • GA

    Australia's Identified Mineral Resources 2014 — Summary

    (2014)
  • GA var. Australia's Identified Mineral Resources. Canberra, ACT: Geoscience Australia...
  • GA et al.

    Australian Mines Atlas Online

    (2015)
  • G.H. Giroux et al.

    Technical Report Describing Geology, Mineralization, Geochemical Surveys, Diamond Drilling, Metallurgical Testing and Mineral Resources at the Keg Property, South-Central Yukon, Canada

    (2013)
  • D. Giurco et al.

    Resource criticality and commodity production projections

    Resources

    (2012)
  • T.E. Graedel et al.

    Methodology of metal criticality determination

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • T. Graupner et al.

    Microthermometric, laser Raman spectroscopic, and volatile-ion chromatographic analysis of hydrothermal fluids in the Paleozoic Muruntau Au-bearing quartz vein ore field, Uzbekistan

    Econ. Geol.

    (2001)
  • C. Hagelüken

    Recycling of Critical Metals

  • HM

    Annual Report 2014

    (2014)
  • J. Horton

    NI43-101 Technical Report Mount Dore–Merlin Deposit, NW Old, Australia

    (2010)
  • S. Hyland et al.

    Technical Report on the Yandera Copper–Molybdenum–Gold Project, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea

    (2012)
  • Cited by (71)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text