Elsevier

Primary Care Diabetes

Volume 13, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages 16-27
Primary Care Diabetes

Original research
Online patient education interventions in type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of systematic reviews

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2018.07.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study synthesises data from 23 systematic reviews of online patient education in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

  • The contained reviews incorporate 87 distinct primary studies.

  • The technology can target biological, behavioural, cognitive and psychological measures.

  • Outcomes most consistently benefitting were knowledge and social support.

Abstract

Aims

Online patient education is a growing form of support to patients with chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes (Type 2 DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multiple systematic reviews have been undertaken on this topic with conflicting results. We aim to explore the applications of online patient education in Type 2 DM and CVD and synthesise current evidence.

Methods

A systematic review of systematic reviews was performed. Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Database were searched between January 2005 and May 2018. Systematic reviews considering patient outcomes of online education interventions for adults with Type 2 DM and/or CVD were included. Quality assessment and data extraction was carried out in duplicate, and data combined using narrative synthesis. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42016034018.

Results

Twenty-three systematic reviews were eligible, synthesizing evidence from 87 distinct primary studies. Six reviews were high quality, nine used meta-analysis. Biological, behavioural, psychological, knowledge and self-efficacy measures are all potential targets. The outcomes most consistently showing benefits were knowledge and social support.

Conclusions

Online patient education has wide ranging benefits for people with Type 2 DM or CVD. Strengths of this review include its comprehensive synthesis of the large amount of literature on this topic.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (Type 2 DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are two of the largest causes of ill health and mortality globally [1]. Whilst pharmacological therapy is a key management component, lifestyle factors significantly impact the trajectory. Making adjustments requires patients to learn about the importance of these factors in their condition [2]. Furthermore, enabling patients to better understand their conditions can improve coping strategies and reduce health related anxiety and depression [3].

Education is available for patients in a wide variety of formats, including printed information, group based structured education and telephone helplines. The internet is an information exchange modality that has come to predominance in the past 10–15 years and several authors have proposed that it might provide a useful modality to reach patients, including geographically or socioeconomically isolated groups [4]. There are 4.6 billion mobile broadband users globally and more than 84% of households in developed countries are now connected to the internet [5]. Other postulated benefits have included cost-efficacy, convenient 24-h access and home use during illness recovery, which may be the time when the patient is most open to lifestyle change. It is argued that whilst on an individual patient level only modest benefits might be seen, the wide reaching potential of these technologies could have a large overall public health impact [6].

A number of studies have evaluated internet based educational interventions for patients with Type 2 DM and CVD, prompting several systematic reviews on this subject [7], [8]. These have drawn conflicting conclusions, and frequently include a different pool of studies despite attempting to address the same research question. The aim of this review of reviews is therefore to explore the effectiveness and scope of online patient education in Type 2 DM and CVD on patient outcomes and to synthesise the current evidence from all studies conducted to date.

Section snippets

Protocol registration

The protocol for this systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO register. The registration number is CRD42016034018.

Inclusion criteria

Only completed published systematic reviews were included. They considered interventions delivered over the internet and including web-based education for participants aged 18 years and over with established CVD and/or Type 2 DM. Studies reported effects on patient outcomes, defined as a change in an aspect of individual patient health status or behaviour, as a result of the

Study selection

The initial search strategy 6418 papers. Following title review and removal of duplicates, 168 abstracts were identified, of which 47 were considered potentially relevant after screening. Twenty-three reviews met all inclusion criteria and are included in this review [3], [4], [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Reference searching did not identify any further reviews. The PRISMA diagram depicting the

Summary of main results

The 23 reviews summarised here have considered a wide range of different online education interventions. Biological, behavioural, psychological outcomes, knowledge and self-efficacy for patients with Type 2 DM and CVD have all shown examples of benefits from online patient education despite a mixed overall picture. Where available, effect sizes suggest that the overlap between outcomes in the control and intervention groups remained substantial or observed benefits were inconsistent between

Conclusions

This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the plethora of research undertaken in the field of online patient education in Type 2 DM and CVD. We have highlighted the types of patient outcomes that may benefit from this technology, discussed their relative successes, and the factors influencing them. The technology shows examples of possible benefits in many different aspects of these conditions however the evidence remains conflicting between individual trials and we have attempted to

Conflict of interest

Dr Angharad Woolley and Dr Michelle Hadjiconstantinou have no duality of interests to declare.

Dr Samuel Seidu has received honoraria for speaking at meetings and serving on Advisory Boards for Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Lilly And Boehringer Ingelheim.

Professor Melanie Davies has acted as consultant, advisory board member and speaker for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Janssen,

Funding

Dr Angharad Woolley is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) clinical research fellow in General Practice whose time is funded by the NIHR. This research was supported by CLAHRC-EM and Leicester NIHR BRC.

References (32)

  • W. Kroeze et al.

    A systematic review of randomised trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviours

    Ann. Behav. Med.

    (2006)
  • R. Devi et al.

    Internet-based interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease

    Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.

    (2015)
  • K. Pal et al.

    Computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Diabetes Care

    (2014)
  • B.J. Shea et al.

    Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

    BMC Med. Res. Methodol.

    (2007)
  • C.R.L. Beishuizen et al.

    Web-based interventions targeting cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged and older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J. Med. Internet Res.

    (2016)
  • D. Bossen et al.

    The effectiveness of self-guided web-based physical activity interventions among patients with a chronic disease: a systematic review

    J. Phys. Act. Health

    (2014)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Educational preferences in individuals with cardiometabolic disease differs with age, ethnicity and educational status

      2022, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      The role of education in stroke and CVD focusses on rehabilitation, physical symptom management and enhancing quality of life, but the evidence base is less well established [10]. In the digital age, online education programmes, websites, and standalone modules are increasingly implemented to increase access, and reduce associated costs, in addition to clinical benefit [11–14]. Despite the broad range of educational modalities available, of the 90% of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus offered structured education in the UK, less than 10% had recorded attendance [15].

    • Digital interventions self-management education for type 1 and 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2021, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mobile health interventions on the other hand, are widely used in DSMES with varying effects [8–10]. Web-based interventions in DSMES have also demonstrated effectiveness in improving various clinical and psychosocial outcomes [5]. Despite the aforementioned advantages, some evidence shows that digital health-led DSMES is not always effective in improving health outcomes, especially if there are no personal interactions incorporated.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text