Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 162, 1 August 2016, Pages 174-180
Physiology & Behavior

Review
From lab to clinic: Extinction of cued cravings to reduce overeating

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Food cue reactivity (FCR) sabotages healthy eating.

  • FCR induces weight gain and impedes weight loss (maintenance).

  • FCR is easily acquired but the extinction of appetitive responding is difficult.

  • Food cue exposure should include new procedures to be more effective.

Abstract

Food cue reactivity is a strong motivation to eat, even in the absence of hunger. Therefore, food cue reactivity might sabotage healthy eating, induce weight gain and impede weight loss or weight maintenance. Food cue reactivity can be learned via Pavlovian appetitive conditioning: It is easily acquired but the extinction of appetitive responding seems to be more challenging. Several properties of extinction make it fragile: extinction does not erase the original learning and extinction is context-dependent. These properties threaten full extinction and increase the risk of full relapse. Extinction procedures are discussed to reduce or prevent the occurrence of rapid reacquisition, spontaneous recovery, renewal and reinstatement after extinction. A translation to food cue exposure treatment is made and suggestions are provided, such as conducting the exposure in relevant contexts, using occasional reinforcement and targeting expectancy violation instead of habituation. A new hypothesis proposed here is that the adding of inhibition training to strengthen inhibition skills that reduce instrumental responding, might be beneficial to improve food cue exposure effects.

Introduction

Imagine a table full of your favorite sweet and savory temptations. Imagine the taste of these delicious foods. Imagine that you could eat them all without any restrictions. You will probably notice that your mouth is starting to water, and you might feel an intense desire to eat, even though you are unaware of many other physiological preparatory responses, such as insulin release, ghrelin response, stomach secretions, dopamine changes, activation of reward-associated areas in the brain and so on (see e.g., [21], [45], [65], [72], [88]). These appetitive responses to cues that signal the availability of food are collectively called food cue reactivity; the responding prepares the body for food intake and increases one's motivation to eat (e.g., [55]). Food cue reactivity during exposure to tasty foods is a normal and healthy response [22], [43], [54], [55]. However, compared to people without eating concerns, food cue reactivity is significantly stronger in concerned eaters, such as unsuccessful dieters, bulimia nervosa patients, binge eaters and obese people [22], [39], [41], [49], [56], [61], [73], [78], [87].

Increased food cue reactivity motivates eating, even in the absence of hunger and in excess of calories physically needed, and therefore easily results in overeating and weight gain [8], [10], [35], [42]. For example, overweight children demonstrated cued overeating while lean children did not and, in the overweight children, the amount eaten correlated strongly with increased salivary responding during exposure to the food (r = 0.62; [39]). Food cue reactivity not only contributes to the maintenance of overeating and weight gain – it also increases the risk of relapse during and after weight loss [42], [43]. Though there exist individual differences in food cue reactivity [14], [50], increased reactivity to food cues usually follows from Pavlovian appetitive conditioning, i.e., associative learning.

Section snippets

Acquisition of food cue reactivity

Food cue reactivity is easily learned. The early observations of Ivan Petrovich Pavlov are the most well-known: Pavlov observed digestive preparatory responses (e.g., salivation) in response to stimuli that signaled dog food, for example specific sounds or footsteps of the person feeding the dog (see [71]). During Pavlovian conditioning - or associative learning - the organism learns that a neutral stimulus predicts the occurrence of a second stimulus (e.g., the eating of dog food). The neutral

Extinction of food cue reactivity

Cued cravings might easily sabotage healthy eating. Dieting, losing weight and the maintenance of lost weight will also be more difficult with increasing levels of food cue reactivity. A reduction in reactivity to tempting food cues could eliminate the primary motivation for eating and might facilitate healthy eating, adherence to restrictive diets, weight loss and weight loss maintenance [42], [43], [44]. Indeed, obese individuals who have successfully lost weight salivated significantly less

Dieting and learning

Diets differ in many respects. For example, some diets are very strict and rigid, while others are more flexible. Some people just try to eat less of many food items during regular meals, others only drink shakes, and others skip meals, and so on. Although we do not know much about behavioral dieting strategies, people who lost weight successfully do report that they are continually strict dieters who show little variety in their diets [25], [64], [91].

In line with these findings, Van den Akker

Inhibition training

Extinction is inhibitory learning and not unlearning, suggesting that extinction might be related to one's ability to inhibit responding. Extinction procedures might therefore be more effective with stronger inhibition skills, while they might be less effective with weaker inhibition skills. One study in our lab indeed demonstrated that participants with weak inhibition skills show worse extinction of appetitive responses compared to participants with stronger inhibition skills ([76], [78]; but

Translation to the clinic: exposure therapy

The clinical analogue of extinction is exposure with response prevention, a well-known behavioral intervention during which participants are repeatedly exposed to unreinforced cues. Exposure therapy has been applied in anxiety disorders for many decades and appears to be effective in reducing fear and avoidance behavior. A translation to addictive disorders (e.g., [20]) and eating disorders (e.g., [34], [35], [36]) was made several decades ago. The food cue exposure with response prevention

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is based on work presented in a MARS lecture at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior in Denver, July 7–11, 2015.

This work is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO): Vici Grant 453.10.006, awarded to Anita Jansen.

We are grateful to Jessica M. Alleva for her help.

References (91)

  • M. Feldman et al.

    Role of thought, sight, smell, and taste of food in the cephalic phase of gastric acid secretion in humans

    Gastroenterology

    (1986)
  • R. Havermans et al.

    Increasing the efficacy of cue exposure treatment in preventing relapse of addictive behavior

    Addict. Behav.

    (2003)
  • K. Houben et al.

    Training inhibitory control: a recipe for resisting sweet temptations

    Appetite

    (2011)
  • K. Houben et al.

    Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2011)
  • K. Houben et al.

    Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate

    Appetite

    (2015)
  • A. Jansen

    A learning model of binge eating: cue reactivity and cue exposure

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (1998)
  • A. Jansen et al.

    A case of bulimia successfully treated with cue exposure

    J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • A. Jansen et al.

    Cue exposure vs self-control in the treatment of binge eating: a pilot study

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (1992)
  • A. Jansen et al.

    Salivation discordant with hunger

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (1992)
  • A. Jansen et al.

    Overweight children overeat after exposure to food cues

    Eat. Behav.

    (2003)
  • A. Jansen et al.

    High-restrained eaters only overeat when they are also impulsive

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (2009)
  • N.S. Lawrence et al.

    Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint

    Appetite

    (2015)
  • N.S. Lawrence et al.

    Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake

    Appetite

    (2015)
  • T. Legenbauer et al.

    Anticipatory effects of food exposure in women diagnosed with bulimia nervosa

    Appetite

    (2004)
  • C. Llewellyn et al.

    Behavioral susceptibility to obesity: Gene-environment interplay in the development of weight

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2015)
  • A.A. Martin et al.

    Human cognitive function and the obesogenic environment

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2014)
  • C. Nederkoorn et al.

    Cephalic phase responses, craving and food intake in normal subjects

    Appetite

    (2000)
  • C. Nederkoorn et al.

    Cue reactivity and regulation of food intake

    Eat. Behav.

    (2002)
  • C. Nederkoorn et al.

    Exposure to binge food in bulimia nervosa: finger pulse amplitude as a potential measure of urge to eat and predictor of food intake

    Appetite

    (2004)
  • C. Nederkoorn et al.

    Impulsivity in obese women

    Appetite

    (2006)
  • C. Nederkoorn et al.

    Why obese children cannot resist food: the role of impulsivity

    Eat. Behav.

    (2006)
  • M.M. Norberg et al.

    A meta-analysis of D-cycloserine and the facilitation of fear extinction and exposure therapy

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • H. Papachristou et al.

    Dissection of appetitive conditioning: does impulsivity play a role?

    Appetite

    (2013)
  • M.L. Power et al.

    Anticipatory physiological regulation in feeding biology

    Appetite

    (2008)
  • G. Schyns et al.

    Expectancy violation, reduction of food cue reactivity and less eating in the absence of hunger after one food cue exposure session for overweight and obese women

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (2016)
  • C. Simon et al.

    Cephalic phase insulin secretion in relation to food presentation in normal and overweight subjects

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1986)
  • A. Tetley et al.

    Individual differences in food-cue reactivity. The role of BMI and everyday portion-size selections

    Appetite

    (2009)
  • K. Van den Akker et al.

    Impulsivity makes more susceptible to overeating after contextual appetitive conditioning

    Appetite

    (2013)
  • K. Van den Akker et al.

    How partial reinforcement of food cues affects the extinction and reacquisition of appetitive responses: a new model for dieting success?

    Appetite

    (2014)
  • K. Van den Akker et al.

    Effects of occasional reinforced trials during extinction on the reacquisition of conditioned responses to food cues

    J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • D. Van Gucht et al.

    Return of experimentally induced chocolate craving after extinction in a different context. divergence between craving for and expecting to eat chocolate

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (2008)
  • D. Van Gucht et al.

    Conditioned craving cues elicit an automatic approach tendency

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (2008)
  • D. Van Gucht et al.

    The inertia of conditioned craving. does context modulate the effect of counterconditioning?

    Appetite

    (2013)
  • H. Veling et al.

    Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods

    Behav. Res. Ther.

    (2011)
  • H. Veling et al.

    Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet. Effects on body weight

    Appetite

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text