Elsevier

Physiotherapy

Volume 97, Issue 1, March 2011, Pages 83-89
Physiotherapy

Discussion
Measuring quality of life in Parkinson's disease: selection of-an-appropriate health-related quality of life instrument

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

There is growing awareness of the need to measure quality of life (QOL) in people with Parkinson's disease during routine physiotherapy assessment. This paper highlights why it is important for clinicians to focus particularly on health-related QOL (HRQOL) when assessing people with this disabling and progressive neurological condition, and provides a guide for selection of the most appropriate instruments for measuring HRQOL. Using measures of health utility, health status and wellbeing, physiotherapists can better understand the social, physical and emotional consequences of Parkinson's disease.

Introduction

This article will demonstrate the importance of measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) when assessing people with Parkinson's disease, and provides a clinical decision matrix to assist therapists to select the most appropriate instrument for measuring HRQOL. Movement disorders such as hypokinesia, tremor, dyskinesia and postural instability are common characteristics of Parkinson's disease [1]. Individuals with Parkinson's disease may also experience a variety of non-motor symptoms, including depression, sleep disturbance, sensory symptoms and autonomic dysfunction [2], [3]. As well as contributing to disability, the motor and non-motor consequences of Parkinson's disease can compromise quality of life (QOL) in some individuals [2]. Although physiotherapists are accustomed to measuring movement disorders and disability, it can be argued that they have only recently started to incorporate measures of QOL into routine clinical assessment.

Section snippets

Defining quality of life

QOL can be defined as ‘an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns’ (p.1405) [4]. Although debate persists regarding what constitutes QOL [5], there are some key concepts common to most definitions. Firstly, QOL can only be validly judged by the individual themselves [5]. This is because the way in which an individual evaluates their QOL often differs

Health-related quality of life

When assessing an individual with Parkinson's disease, HRQOL is the dimension of life quality that is of particular interest to physiotherapists. This narrows the focus of QOL to the effects of health, and is closely related to the activity and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [15], [16], [17]. For example, a person with Parkinson's disease can have a good HRQOL despite having movement impairments such as tremor or dyskinesia if

Measuring health-related quality of life

Instruments available for measuring HRQOL in people with Parkinson's disease can be classified into three categories: (i) health status, (ii) health utility and (iii) wellbeing (Fig. 2).

Clinical implications

Fig. 3 depicts a decision matrix that may assist clinicians and researchers to select the most appropriate tool for assessing HRQOL in people with Parkinson's disease. The first step is to decide whether to measure HRQOL or another dimension of QOL. If the choice is to measure HRQOL, the next step is to choose a Parkinson's disease-specific or generic instrument. The Parkinson's disease-specific instruments are shown on the left side of the matrix and the generic tools are shown on the right.

Summary

QOL in people with Parkinson's disease can be influenced by their health, socio-economic status, personal beliefs, environmental issues and social relationships. Physiotherapists can assess the HRQOL of people with Parkinson's disease using measures of health utility, health status or wellbeing. Incorporating measures of HRQOL together with clinical measures of Parkinson's disease can guide the assessment and clinical decision-making processes with the aim of optimising the effectiveness of

References (32)

  • A. Lau et al.

    Conceptualizing quality of life for elderly people with stroke

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2001)
  • R.A. Cummins

    Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory

    J Intellect Disabil Res

    (2005)
  • International Wellbeing Group

    Personal wellbeing index

    (2006)
  • J.E. Ware et al.

    The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • R.A. Cummins

    The domains of life satisfaction: an attempt to order chaos

    Soc Indic Res

    (1996)
  • B. Lindstrom

    Quality of life—a model for evaluating health for all. Conceptual considerations and policy implications

    Sozial-Und Praventivmedizin

    (1992)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Dancing for Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Trial of Irish Set Dancing Compared With Usual Care

      2017, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Motor impairment, functional endurance, balance, and QOL were assessed using the following psychometrically appropriate measures: the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, 6-minute walk test, mini-BESTest, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), respectively.23-28 The PDQ-39 specifically measures health status, a dimension of QOL.29 A subsample of participants in the dance group completed an exit questionnaire30 at the end of the study.

    • Quality of life in patients with PD and their caregiving spouses: A view from both sides

      2015, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the 36 item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) are well known examples of scales that were frequently used to study PD [3,31–34]. The EuroQoL scale (EQ-5D) is especially interesting as it is relatively short, it includes an evaluation with a linear visual analogue scale (VAS) and, similar to the SIP and SF-36, normative values were reported as a means of comparison to a healthy control population [3,7,23,35–39]. The VAS has frequently been used in other studies considering the quality of life in Parkinson's disease [3,7,23,35–39].

    • Determinants of health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

      2011, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      In studies that reported the mean duration of PD and the mean age of diagnosis, the mean disease duration was 6.80 years (range 2.98–12.1) and the mean age of onset was 58.96 years (range 52.6–66.7). The instruments that can be used to measure HRQOL in PD can be classified into three categories: health status, health utility and wellbeing [34]. The majority of studies utilised either a generic or disease-specific measure of health status to quantify HRQOL (Table 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text