Elsevier

Physics Letters B

Volume 632, Issue 1, 5 January 2006, Pages 51-57
Physics Letters B

Search for lepton and baryon number violating τ decays into Λ¯π and Λπ

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.10.024Get rights and content

Abstract

We have searched for τ lepton decays, τΛ¯π and τΛπ, that simultaneously violate the conservation of the lepton (L) and baryon (B) number using a data sample of 154fb−1 collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB e+e asymmetric-energy collider. No evidence for a signal was found in either of the decay modes and we set the following upper limits for the branching fractions: B(τΛ¯π)<1.4×10−7 and B(τΛπ)<0.72×10−7 at the 90% confidence level. This is the first search ever performed for these modes.

Introduction

While the Standard Model (SM) assumes both the baryon (B) and lepton number (L) conservation, in some extensions of the SM, such as supersymmetric [1] and superstring [2] models, B and L violation is expected while their difference BL should be conserved. Existing searches for baryon number violation are restricted to experiments with nucleons [3]. Limits from searches for proton decay imply that the τ lepton decays with baryon number violation can be expected to have a probability well below the current experimental sensitivity [4]. However, high luminosity B-factories provide an opportunity to look for decays of the τ lepton, D and B mesons that violate B and L with unprecedented sensitivity. Until now, searches for τ lepton decays with a baryon final state involved a proton only [5]. Upper limits for the branching fraction of these decays are in the range of 10−5–10−6. In a recent extension of the SM [6], decays of τ lepton as well as D and B mesons that violate B and L were considered using right-handed four-fermion couplings that conserve BL and it was suggested that τΛ¯π decay involving the second and third generation transition might be interesting.

We report here our search for τΛ¯π and τΛπ decays with a data sample of 154fb−1 collected at the ϒ(4S) resonance and 60 MeV below it with the Belle detector at the KEKB e+e asymmetric-energy collider [7]. These τ lepton decay modes have never been studied before.1

The Belle detector is a large-solid-angle magnetic spectrometer that consists of a silicon vertex detector (SVD), a 50-layer central drift chamber (CDC), an array of aerogel threshold Čerenkov counters (ACC), a barrel-like arrangement of time-of-flight scintillation counters (TOF), and an electromagnetic calorimeter comprised of CsI(Tl) crystals (ECL) located inside a superconducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5 T magnetic field. An iron flux-return located outside of the coil is instrumented to detect KL0 mesons and to identify muons (KLM). The detector is described in detail elsewhere [8].

Particle identification is very important in this measurement. It is based on the ratio of the energy deposited in the ECL to the momentum measured in the SVD and CDC, the shower shape in the ECL, the particle range in the KLM, the hit information from the ACC, dE/dX in the CDC and time-of-flight from the TOF. To distinguish hadron species, we use likelihood ratios, for instance, P(p/π)=Lp/(Lp+Lπ), where Li is the likelihood for the detector response to the track with flavor hypothesis i. For lepton identification, we use likelihood ratios as electron probability P(e) [9] and muon probability P(μ) [10] determined by the responses of the appropriate subdetectors.

For the Monte Carlo (MC) studies, the following programs are used to generate background events: KORALB/TAUOLA [11] for τ+τ, QQ [12] for BB¯ and continuum, BHLUMI [13] for Bhabha, KKMC [14] for μ+μ and AAFH [15] for two-photon processes. Signal MC is generated by KORALB/TAUOLA. To take a range of possible τΛ¯π and τΛπ decay mechanisms into account, we generate events under three different assumptions: uniform angular distribution in the τ rest frame, VA and V+A interactions. We initially assume all τ decays to have a uniform angular distribution and take the other hypotheses into account later. The Belle detector response is simulated by a GEANT 3 [16] based program. Unless stated otherwise, all kinematic variables are calculated in the laboratory frame, while the ones calculated in the e+e center-of-mass (CM) frame are indicated by the superscript “CM”.

Section snippets

Data analysis

We search for τ+τ events in which one τ decays into Λ¯π and Λπ (signal side) and the other τ (tag side) decays into one charged particle with any number of additional photons and neutrinos. Thus, for the BL conserving modes the experimental signature is{τ(p¯π+)+π}+{τ+(a track)++(nγTAG0)+X(missing)}, and for the BL violating modes, it is{τ(pπ)+π}+{τ+(a track)++(nγTAG0)+X(missing)}. Here charged tracks and photons are required to be reconstructed within the fiducial volume defined

Results

Signal candidates are examined in the two-dimensional space of the Λ¯π/ Λπ invariant mass, Minv, and the difference of their energy from the beam energy in the CM system, ΔE. A signal event should have Minv close to the τ-lepton mass and ΔE close to 0. The Minv and ΔE resolutions are parameterized from the MC distributions around the peak using an asymmetric Gaussian shape to account for initial state radiation with widths σMinvhigh/low=4.6/4.0MeV/c2 and σΔEhigh/low=22/29MeV, where the

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have searched for the decay modes that violate both lepton and baryon number conservation: τΛ¯π (BL conserving) and τΛπ (BL violating) using data collected by the Belle detector at the KEKB e+e asymmetric-energy collider. We found no signal in the either mode. The following upper limits on the branching fractions were obtained: B(τΛ¯π)<1.4×10−7 and B(τΛπ)<0.72×10−7 at the 90% confidence level. These are the first results ever reported for these modes.

Acknowledgements

We thank the KEKB group for the excellent operation of the accelerator, the KEK cryogenics group for the efficient operation of the solenoid, and the KEK computer group and the National Institute of Informatics for valuable computing and Super-SINET network support. We acknowledge support from

  • the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science;

  • the Australian Research Council and the Australian Department of Education,

References (22)

  • S. Lola et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1993)
  • G. Lazarides et al.

    Nucl. Phys. B

    (1986)
  • S. Eidelman

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2004)
  • W. Marciano

    Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.)

    (1995)
  • S. Kurokawa et al.

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods A

    (2003)
  • A. Abashian

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods A

    (2002)
  • K. Hanagaki

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods A

    (2002)
  • A. Abashian

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods A

    (2002)
  • S. Jadach et al.

    Comput. Phys. Commun.

    (1995)
  • S. Jadach

    Comput. Phys. Commun.

    (1992)
  • S. Jadach

    Comput. Phys. Commun.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text