Popular digital knowledge dissemination platforms: Evaluating the pragmatic professional credibility from Wikipedia to Academia.edu and ResearchGate
Introduction
A rapid exchange of information is crucial in academic circles today. Digital communication, access to other researchers' work as well as the possibility to disseminate one's own, is particularly important for young scholars in their early careers and for international scholars who have restricted access to research published in high-ranking research journals and book series, not only because of weak internet connections but also because of commercial paywalls. The (seemingly) freely available new internet tools of knowledge dissemination are therefore a welcome opportunity for professional digital natives. By this I mean professional researchers who have to rely on general up-to-date educational platforms (outside of their institutional libraries) for their academic interests. These interests may range from general professional information (like the accepted short definitions of academic terms and related introductory reading from Wikipedia) to advanced specialized research (like a recent article by a researcher in academia.edu or ResearchGate). Of course, such digital platforms should provide open access whenever needed without unwanted personal restrictions or data mining – although the borderline between welcome suggestion and unwanted spam may be rather personal.
However, as social media have a bad reputation, the question of credibility arises and this is closely related to professional interpersonal use of language. In a provocative colophon on “How social media endangers knowledge” for the computer magazine “Wired”, Derakhshan (2017) was worried about how to “save Wikipedia and its promise of a free and open collection of all human knowledge” (Derakhshan, 2017: n.p.). Guy (2012) pointed out that “research on the effectiveness of social media in teaching and learning is limited to the use of discussions, chats, blogs, and wikis; therefore, the need exists for further exploration in determining how other social media platforms can be used for academic practice” – and this is still true today, especially from a researcher's perspective. Thelwall and Kousha (2014) queried the extent to which ResearchGate is useful in “disseminating, communicating and [even!] measuring scholarship”, when it can also be perceived as a threat by both young and experienced researchers, especially in the humanities, who are so far less accustomed to “academic metrics”. The “possibilities and perils of academic social networking sites” (Williams and Woodacre, 2016) are topical in many disciplines.
In this multidisciplinary discourse, two questions can be asked from a linguistic perspective:
- a)
To what extent do the three platforms Wikipedia, Academia.edu and ResearchGate really serve professional needs of (linguistic) researchers?
- b)
Can we use functional pragmatic corpus-linguistic analyses to demonstrate this?
The linguistic concepts to explore the pragmatic interaction between platforms and users in this article are based on Halliday's functional grammar (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2014), especially on the textual and interpersonal metafunctions, cohesive1 and interactive devices, such as intra- and extratextual references through pronouns, modals and imperatives. Like Thompson (2014: 46), I separate “the experiential meanings (the ‘content’) from the interpersonal ones (the ‘interaction’)”. Only linguistic concepts that focus on the metalinguistic functions are discussed in this contribution in order to show that pragmatic analyses and functional evaluation (Martin and White, 2005) can reveal important aspects of successful professional interaction in knowledge dissemination.
Section snippets
“Digital knowledge dissemination platforms” and related terms
The complex term “digital knowledge dissemination platforms” does not seem to exist – at least in Google searches, we receive no results, although it is useful, combining the topical concepts of digital knowledge dissemination (DKD) and popular platform, both (very) frequently found in internet searches. Interestingly, the adjective digital collocates with all three of the following nouns: knowledge is usually stored in digital form on a digital platform and disseminated by digital means, i.e.
Description of platforms and qualitative aspects of their language in reader interaction
Over the years, the three DKD platforms discussed in this contribution have developed a complex web presence, which will be presented only briefly here in terms of their description in Wikipedia, in on-line discussion forums and social media in contrast to the self-presentation on their webpages. Since most of the evaluation depends on personal and community-specific preferences and personal expectations, the perspective here is explicitly one of a critical senior linguist - although
Quantitative aspects of personal platform messages
For a comparison of platform messages, I used a small corpus of all emails (778 texts with 8162 words) that were sent to my address in the year 2019, during which I was a passive recipient and did not interact with the platforms in any uploading activity. As Wikipedia does not interact with individual users via email, only Academia.edu and ResearchGate could be included in this quantitative interaction analysis. The two subcorpora consisted of 575 vs. 203 texts and 6440 vs. 1722 words from
Summary
Our qualitative and quantitative analyses of the three popular digital knowledge dissemination platforms Wikipedia, Academia.edu and ResearchGate shows: Wikipedia as a popular knowledge dissemination platform only uses internal messages to maintain limited interaction in order to ensure the quality of texts, usually templates by volunteers and only partly by automated agents or bots. Academia.edu and ResearchGate do not only generate different types of internal messages, but they include a busy
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to the organizers of the inspiring CLAVIER Conference in Modena in 2015, two anonymous reviewers for interesting comments that allowed me to clarify and expand my linguistic ideas in this fascinating multidisciplinary field, and to Jessica Dheskali, Hildegard Schäffler, Sven Albrecht and Marina Ivanova for valuable comments when I was finalizing this paper. The concept of credibility was developed in the context of our “Hybrid Society” Project ID 416228727 – SFB 1410 funded by the
Josef Schmied has been full Professor of English Language & Linguistics at Chemnitz University of Technology since 1993. His main research interests are in Language & Culture (sociolinguistics, English in Africa and SE Asia), Language & Computers (corpus-linguistics, Internet English), and Language & Cognition (e-learning, Academic Writing).
References (38)
Wikimedia CEO: Technology Could Be Used for Great Harm | Talk to Al Jazeera
(2021)Users' distribution and behavior in academic social network sites
Int. J. e-Collaboration
(2018)Introduction: business communication in the digital age – fresh perspectives
How Social Media Endangers Knowledge
(2017 19 October)Vertrauen in Internetangebote: Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Einfluss von Glaubwürdigkeitsindikatoren bei der Nutzung von Online-therapie und Online-Beratungsangeboten
(2005)ScholarlyHub – A New Non-profit Network for Scholars from Scholars
(2019 May 24)Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Nature
(2005)Free for All? Lifting the Lid on a Wikipedia Crisis
(2013 April 10)Professional Discourse
(2009)The use of social media for academic practice: a review of literature
Kentucky J. Higher Edu. Pol Pract.
(2012)
Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar
Die Glaubwürdigkeit der Wikipedia
Inf.-Wissenschaft Praxis
Common Knowledge? an Ethnography of Wikipedia
e-Language: communication in the digital age
Accelerating Scholarly Communication. The Transformative Role of Preprints
The ResearchGate Score: a Good Example of a Bad Metric
The socialisation of early Internet bots: IRC and the ecology of human-robot interactions online
Motivations for self-archiving on an academic social networking site: a study on ResearchGate
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
Networked scholarship and motivations for social media use in scholarly communication
Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn.
Cited by (6)
Awareness and Usage of Academic Social Networking Sites: Female Research Scholars and Faculties
2024, International Journal of Information Science and ManagementOnline platforms' framing around vaping
2023, Drug Testing and AnalysisWikipedia and academia: University faculty patterns of use and perceptions of credibility
2023, Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceAcademia Letters: Examination of an 'Experimental' Academia.edu Publishing Model
2023, Journal of Scholarly PublishingThe role of Wikipedia in the dissemination of new knowledge: Analysis of the entry desinformación as a changeable concept
2022, Communication and Society
Josef Schmied has been full Professor of English Language & Linguistics at Chemnitz University of Technology since 1993. His main research interests are in Language & Culture (sociolinguistics, English in Africa and SE Asia), Language & Computers (corpus-linguistics, Internet English), and Language & Cognition (e-learning, Academic Writing).