First and second order lagrangian conditional moment closure method in turbulent nonpremixed flames

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.07.058Get rights and content

Abstract

The Lagrangian CMC method is developed by conditionally averaging the quantities associated with Lagrangian particles originating from the nozzle exit. It involves multiple flame groups of sequentially injected fuel, each of which shares the same conditional flame structure under the same residence time. The probability, pk, to find the kth group is assumed proportional to the partial mean mixture fraction, ξk, to obtain the local conditional flame structure as a weighted average by pk. The Lagrangian CMC method allows flexibility of flamelet based methods and requires less computational load than Eulerian CMC. It is implemented in OpenFOAM and applied with first and second order closure to the piloted jet diffusion flames near extinction, Sandia Flame D and E. Results show good agreement for all conditional profiles and noticeable improvement by second order correction of four rate limiting steps in the GRI 3.0 mechanism. Good agreement is achieved for conditional variances and covariances among temperature and species involved in the rate limiting reaction steps.

Introduction

The conditional moment closure (CMC) method is based on conditional averaging in terms of the sampling variable for mixture fraction without a priori assumption on flame structures or combustion regimes in turbulent nonpremixed combustion. Nonlinear reaction rates were modeled by first and second order closure in terms of conditional means, variances and covariances of species mass fractions and temperature [1], [2], [3]. Eulerian CMC is appropriate for complicated recirculating flow, while it suffers from an additional dimension of the sampling variable and uncertainties in the closure models [4]. Conditional equations were often discretized with homogeneity assumed in the cross-stream direction or in the whole domain as an incompletely stirred reactor to reduce the dimension in Eulerian CMC [5]. Dual meshes were employed to reduce computational burden in three dimensional CMC and Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) fields of furnaces [6], diesel engines [7], and compartment fires [8].

Steady and unsteady flamelet models have been employed in a wide range of practical problems due to their simpler structure and computational efficiency [9], [10], [11]. They require less computational load than Eulerian CMC for a limited number of Lagrangian flamelets coupled with mean flow field or in the postprocessing mode. Lagrangian CMC [12] was proposed in terms of multiple Lagrangian fuel groups according to injection sequence or residence time to resolve some of the difficulties in Eulerian CMC. The same conditional profile was assumed for each fuel group with no convection and diffusion terms, therefore, no model required for conditional velocity nor the gradient diffusion assumption. Lagrangian CMC has some similarity with the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM) [13], [14] which tracks the mass weighted fraction of particles for multiple Lagrangian flamelets. The CMC method has its strength in general validity of the conditional equations derived through rigorous mathematical procedure and flexibility to allow higher order closure of conditional reaction rates. Flame group interaction was taken into account by the eddy breakup model as premixed combustion along constant mixture fraction contours for a lifted flame [15] or to avoid abrupt ignition and heat release of sequential groups in a diesel engine [16]. In this paper Lagrangian CMC is established through the generalized function procedure together with a transport equation for the associated probability density function (PDF). Governing equations and conditional submodels are introduced for first and second order closure of the reaction rates and applied to Sandia Flame D and E in the Turbulent Nonpremixed Flame Workshop website [17].

Section snippets

Derivation of the Lagrangian CMC equation

Consider a Lagrangian particle originating from x0 at the nozzle exit at time t0 so that xL(t0) = x0 and ξL(t0) = 1. Any Lagrangian quantity associated with the particle may be represented as ΦL(t)=Φ(xL(t),t) implying QηL(η,t)=Qη(η,xL(t),t). Qη(η,x,t) is the conditional mean of Φ defined as Φ(x,t)|ξ=η [4]. ξ is the mixture fraction and η is the sampling variable for fluctuating ξ. The subscript, L, represents a Lagrangian quantity. It holds thatxL(t)t=v(xL(t),t)ξL(t)t=DDtξ(x,t)x=xL(t)so that

Procedure for multiple flame groups and closure models

Multiple flame groups may be defined for fuel injected sequentially at the nozzle and tracked with Lagrangian identities in the domain. Fuel of the same residence time shares approximately the same conditional flame structure in many problems including transient autoignition and steady parabolic 1D jet flames. In this work each flame group evolves independently from the initial state of fuel and air according to the mean SDR over the flame region with no mutual interaction among flame groups.

Numerical algorithm

Figure 1 shows the flow chart of OpenFOAM coupled with the Lagrangian CMC routine. It is divided into two parts. One is the OpenFOAM routine which solves flow and mixing field in the physical space, i.e., Favre mean mass, momentum, energy, mean mixture fraction, mixture fraction variance and ξk. The other is the CMC routine which solves conditional mean mass fractions and enthalpy in the mixture fraction space. Conditional SDR, pressure and its temporal rate of change are provided from

Results and discussion

The first and second order Lagrangian CMC methods are applied to Sandia Flame D and E, turbulent piloted jet diffusion flames near extinction with the Reynolds number of 22,400 and 33,600, respectively. Fuel is mixture of methane and air of a 1:3 volume ratio injected at 294 K through a single hole nozzle. The diameter, d, of the fuel jet is 7.2 mm, while the outer diameter of the annular pilot is 18.2 mm. The fuel jet is injected at 49.6 m/s and 74.4 m/s for Flame D and E, while the coflow air

Conclusion

  • (1)

    The Lagrangian CMC method is developed in terms of multiple fuel groups injected sequentially into the domain. Each Lagrangian fuel group has the same homogeneous conditional flame structure under the same residence time. The probability to find the kth group is assumed proportional to ξk so that the local flame structure is given as the weighted average in Eq. (12). The mean SDR for each group is given as the average weighted by local ρ¯, pk and Pη and integrated over the domain in Eq. (14).

  • (2)

References (24)

  • A.Y. Klimenko et al.

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (1999)
  • J.W. Rogerson et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (2007)
  • M.J. Cleary et al.

    Combust. Flame

    (2005)
  • H. Pitsch et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (1998)
  • H. Barths et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (1998)
  • C. Felsch et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (2009)
  • H. Barths et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (2000)
  • P.J. Coelho et al.

    Combust. Flame

    (2001)
  • S.H. Kim et al.

    Combust. Flame

    (2004)
  • R.J. Kee et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (1989)
  • Ch. Schneider et al.

    Combust. Flame

    (2003)
  • A.N. Karpetis et al.

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (13)

    • OpenFOAM based conditional moment closure (CMC) model for solving non-premixed turbulent combustion: Integration and validation

      2019, Computers and Fluids
      Citation Excerpt :

      The coupling methodology (CFD-CMC) discussed in this article has been intended to solve non-premixed combustion problems. The remarkable difference between other methodologies of CFD-CMC coupling [26–30] and the present methodology is that all CMC functionalities (conditional transport equations and sub-models) have been built entirely within the OpenFOAM C++ object-oriented framework. This enables to solve flow-field equations and conditional transport equations together at every time-step so that even transient problems may be analyzed.

    • Simulation of flow field and carbon monoxide emission in an industrial scale heat recovery steam generator

      2018, Applied Thermal Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is consistent with the conditional profile showing a higher CO for rich mixture in Fig. 9, which led to the overpredicted Favre mean CO for rich mixture near the nozzle in Fig. 8. The results in Figs. 7–9 are consistent with the previous ones for Sandia Flame D by the conditional moment closure model in Kim et al. [19] and Han and Huh [20]. The ULFM is employed in the following simulations of flow field and CO emission for the industrial scale HRSG under consideration.

    • Comparative study between Conditional Moment Closure (CMC) and Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) applied to piloted jet flames

      2017, Combustion and Flame
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the current study, a simulation using a mixed inlet boundary condition (burning in pilot, non-reacting everywhere else) did not improve the CMC predictions (not shown). This observation is consistent with previous RANS-CMC simulations using mixed inlet boundary conditions for the Sandia D and E flames, which resulted in temperature overprediction for Flame E [52,53]. In [55], where LES-CMC simulation results for Flame F are presented, it is clearly shown that LES-CMC is able to accurately capture this trend.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text