Elsevier

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Volume 254, 30 August 2016, Pages 119-126
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Global and local grey matter reductions in boys with ADHD combined type and ADHD inattentive type

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.06.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Grey matter volume reductions in ADHD compared to typically developing children.

  • A significant group-by-age interaction was observed in the right caudate nucleus.

  • No volume differences between the ADHD-Inattentive and ADHD-Combined type groups.

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has reliably been associated with global grey matter reductions but local alterations are largely inconsistent with perhaps the exception of the caudate nucleus. The aim of this study was to examine local and global brain volume differences between typically developing children (TD) and children with a diagnosis of ADHD. We also addressed whether these parameters would differ between children with the ADHD-combined type (ADHD-C) and those with the ADHD-inattentive type (ADHD-I). Using an ROI approach caudate volume differences were also examined. 79 boys between the ages of 8 and 17 participated in the study. Of those 33 met diagnostic criteria for the ADHD-C and 15 for the ADHD-I subtype. 31 boys were included in the TD group. Structural magnetic resonance imaging data were analysed using voxel-based morphometry. The ADHD group had significantly lower global and local grey matter volumes within clusters in the bilateral frontal, right parietal and right temporal regions compared to TD. A significant group by age interaction was found for right caudate nucleus volume. No differences between the ADHD-C and ADHD-I groups were found. Right caudate nucleus volume and age are more strongly related in ADHD than in TD consistent with previous research.

Introduction

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood developmental disorder defined by age-inappropriate levels of inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity (American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013). It is commonly associated with impairments in social, cognitive, educational and emotional domains (e.g., Ek et al., 2011, Martel et al., 2007, Nijmeijer et al., 2008, Shaw et al., 2014, Willcutt et al., 2012).

Neuroimaging studies of children and adolescents with ADHD have reported anomalous brain structure including global and local reductions in brain volume (Frodl and Skokauskas, 2012, Nakao et al., 2011). Meta-analyses of regional volumetric differences have implicated smaller basal ganglia structures including the right globus pallidus, putamen and bilateral caudate in children and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in adults with ADHD (Frodl and Skokauskas, 2012, Nakao et al., 2011). However, the studies included in the meta-analyses were based on small, often underpowered samples. A recent investigation with a relatively large sample (n=131) of adults with ADHD only found subtle differences in global volumetric measures but no differences in local grey matter volumes (Maier et al., in press). Investigations in paediatric ADHD with larger samples (n >20) have reported grey matter reductions in the bilateral caudate and cerebellum (Yang et al., 2008), predominantly right-sided frontal–pallidal–parietal regions (McAlonan et al., 2007), bilateral frontal and cerebellar regions (Carmona et al., 2005), left dorsolateral/precentral prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Stevens and Haney-Caron, 2012) as well as no differences compared to typically developing control participants (Villemonteix et al., 2015). Inconsistencies across studies may be explained by differences in sample characteristics (medication status, age, gender ratios, comorbid conditions) or the structural neuroimaging methodology used. ADHD is heterogeneous in nature with inattentive symptoms accounting for varying levels of disorgor dysexecutive function and hyp/or dysexecutive function and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms relating to varying levels of abnormal reward discounting, social disinhibition and/or emotional dysregulation (Frick and Nigg, 2012). Therefore, most ADHD samples are likely to consist of differing individual neuropsychological and/or neurobiological profiles.

Despite the heterogeneity, several previous studies and subsequent meta-analyses have reported volume reductions of the caudate nucleus in children with ADHD (Frodl and Skokauskas, 2012, Nakao et al., 2011), which seem to normalise with increasing age (Carrey et al., 2012, Nakao et al., 2011). Caudate asymmetry may also be different in individuals with ADHD (Castellanos et al., 1994) with abnormalities more often observed on the right (Almeida Montes et al., 2010, Filipek et al., 1997, Tremols et al., 2008, Valera et al., 2007). Relative greater right than left caudate nucleus volume has been associated with higher attentional impulsiveness and higher ADHD symptom ratings in healthy young adults (Dang et al., 2016) as well as parent-rated symptoms of inattention in children without an ADHD diagnosis (Schrimsher et al., 2002).

The caudate nucleus plays a major role in relaying information from the prefrontal cortex to the basal ganglia and thalamus and back to the PFC (Arnsten and Rubia, 2012). Evidence from lesion studies in humans and animals and functional neuroimaging studies suggests that the caudate nucleus is crucial for attentional control (Crofts et al., 2001) and goal-directed action (Grahn et al., 2008). Tasks that probe attentional and executive function processes such as response inhibition and working memory during functional magnetic resonance imaging elicit less activation of the caudate nucleus in individuals with ADHD compared to control participants (e.g., Cubillo et al., 2011, Silk et al., 2005, Vance et al., 2007).

ADHD according to DSM-IV (APA, 1994) has been divided into three subtypes: a combined type (ADHD-C), which shares symptoms of hyperactivity and inattention, an inattentive type (ADHD-I), which exhibits primarily symptoms of inattention with no or few hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and a less common hyperactive type (ADHD-H), which shows hyperactive/impulsive symptoms but no or few difficulties in the domain of attention. These subtypes show limited stability over time, in contrast to the general diagnosis (Willcutt et al., 2012) suggesting subtypes may add little extra information to diagnosis and treatment. In recognition of the lack of evidence for concrete subcategories of ADHD, DSM5 denominates varying levels of hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive symptoms no longer subtypes but presentations (APA, 2013). The ICD10 equivalent of ADHD, hyperkinetic disorder does not distinguish between subtypes and/or presentations.

There is considerable debate as to whether ADHD subtypes have common or distinct underlying neurobiology. Neuroimaging studies have often failed to detect differences between the ADHD-C and ADHD-I subtypes but many of these studies were underpowered (Willcutt et al., 2012). A recent study in adults with ADHD (Maier et al., in press) comprising a relatively large sample of 66 individuals with a diagnosis of ADHD-C and 60 individuals with a diagnosis of ADHD-I only reported a trend for reduced grey matter in the left dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) in the inattentive compared to the combined type. Few studies to date have examined volume differences between ADHD subtypes in children and adolescents with ADHD. Carmona et al. (2005) found no differences in grey matter volume between the two subtypes albeit in a very small sample and Pineda et al. (2002) also failed to detect significant volumetric differences of the caudate nucleus between children with ADHD-C and ADHD-I.

In this study we aimed to compare local and global grey matter volumetric differences between children with ADHD and typically developing children (TD). We expected to find reductions in both global and regional grey matter volumes in the ADHD group compared to TD. Due to inconsistent results of previous studies we did not make predictions as to the specific regions showing volume loss in ADHD. However, given meta-analytic findings of reduced caudate volume in ADHD we decided to test caudate volume differences hypothesising that the ADHD group would exhibit reductions in the volume of right caudate nucleus compared to TD. As it has previously been suggested that caudate volume shows a differential developmental trajectory in children with ADHD we were interested in the relationship between caudate volume and age and whether these would differ for each group. Given uncertainties with regard to structural differences between ADHD subtypes we further aimed to address the question of whether there are global and local volumetric differences in grey matter in boys with ADHD-C and ADHD-I compared to each other.

Section snippets

Participants

A total of 79 male participants took part in the study (age range 8.0–17.5 years). 48 boys meeting DSM-IV criteria for ADHD were recruited through an outpatient child psychiatry unit. Of these 33 met diagnostic criteria for ADHD-C and 15 met diagnostic criteria for ADHD-I. The Anxiety Disorders Child and Parent Interview Schedule (ADIS) (Silverman and Nelles, 1988) was used to ascertain diagnosis including comorbid conditions of oppositional defiant disorder and/or conduct disorder. In addition

Demographic information

Groups did not differ in age but significant differences in full-scale IQ were found (Table 2).

Global measures

The ADHD group had a significantly lower ICV compared to TD with a reduction of around 6%. This reduction is likely driven by the reduction in overall grey matter volume by around 8% in the clinical group as group differences in ICV are no longer significant when controlling for total grey matter (F(1,76)=0.729, p=0.396). Global white matter volume also showed a small but significant reduction. No

Discussion

This study found global reductions in total brain, grey and white matter volumes in children with ADHD compared to TD. Regional grey matter differences comprised clusters within the medial, middle and superior frontal gyri as well as the right superior parietal and the right middle temporal gyri. The study failed to find volume differences in the caudate nucleus between children with ADHD and TD; but a significant age by group interaction was found for the right caudate. Caudate volume showed a

Conflict of interest

All authors are declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted within the Academic Child Psychiatry Unit, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital (clinical research assessments and scans) and the Developmental Imaging research group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and the Children's MRI Centre, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria (imaging analyses). NHMRC project grants 384419 and 569533 provided funds for the data collection. It was also supported by the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, the

References (56)

  • M. Kobel et al.

    Structural and functional imaging approaches in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: does the temporal lobe play a key role?

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2010)
  • C. Liston et al.

    Atypical prefrontal connectivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: pathway to disease or pathological end point?

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • M.M. Martel et al.

    Executive function in adolescents with ADHD

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • G.M. McAlonan et al.

    Mapping brain structure in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: a voxel-based MRI study of regional grey and white matter volume

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2007)
  • J.S. Nijmeijer et al.

    Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and social dysfunctioning

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (2008)
  • K. Rubia et al.

    Temporal lobe dysfunction in medication-naive boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during attention allocation and its relation to response variability

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • P. Shaw et al.

    Trajectories of cerebral cortical development in childhood and adolescence and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • W.K. Silverman et al.

    The anxiety disorders interview schedule for children

    J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • V. Tremols et al.

    Differential abnormalities of the head and body of the caudate nucleus in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2008)
  • E.M. Valera et al.

    Meta-analysis of structural imaging findings in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • H. van Ewijk et al.

    Diffusion tensor imaging in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2012)
  • T. Villemonteix et al.

    Grey matter volume differences associated with gender in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a voxel-based morphometry study

    Dev. Cognit. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • P. Yang et al.

    Absence of gender effect on children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder as assessed by optimized voxel-based morphometry

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2008)
  • T.M. Achenbach

    The child behavior profile: I. Boys aged 6–11

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1978)
  • L.G. Almeida Montes et al.

    Clinical correlations of grey matter reductions in the caudate nucleus of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    J. Psychiatry Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV

    (1994)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5

    (2013)
  • A. Angold et al.

    Comorbidity

    J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • Cited by (35)

    • ADHD-inattentive versus ADHD-Combined subtypes: A severity continuum or two distinct entities? A comprehensive analysis of clinical, cognitive and neuroimaging data

      2022, Journal of Psychiatric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Different neuropsychological paradigms used in each study and clinical features of participants, such as comorbidity, gender, and age range, might contribute to the inconsistency (Castagna et al., 2019; Menghini et al., 2018; Skogli et al., 2017; Ter-Stepanian et al., 2017). Previously, most structural MRI studies with small sample sizes (n ≤ 50) have failed to identify any significant volumetric differences between ADHD-C and ADHD-I patients (Carmona et al., 2005; Pineda et al., 2002; Vilgis et al., 2016). In one of these studies, the ADHD-C group showed a smaller volume of the bilateral caudate and anterior cingulate cortex than the ADHD-I and control groups did (Semrud-Clikeman et al., 2017).

    • Linked anatomical and functional brain alterations in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

      2019, NeuroImage: Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous findings of smaller FA and greater RD and MD in widespread regions including anterior thalamic radiation, and cingulum and body of the corpus callosum(van Ewijk et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2017; Svatkova et al., 2016; Onnink et al., 2015; Aoki et al., 2018) (the latter FA finding also seen in meta-analysis(Chen et al., 2016)) were also replicated. Moreover, the observed GMV reduction in posterior brain regions in ADHD was also in line with some previous studies(Bralten et al., 2016; Vilgis et al., 2016; Carmona et al., 2005). However, we were not able to replicate the GMV reduction in anterior parts of the brain (Frodl and Skokauskas, 2012; Saad et al., 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text