Managing process chemicals, technology and equipment information for pilot plant based on Process Safety Management standard

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.02.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A structured system to manage process chemicals, technology and equipment information based on OSHA PSM.

  • Organized strategies to manage documentations, communicate information, and written program for maintaining, revising and updating process information.

  • P&ID is used as a foundation for data management.

  • Successfully tested to manage PSI in pilot plant.

Abstract

Injuries, accidents or even fatalities while working in pilot plant are reported worldwide. The OSHA Laboratory Standard and Hazard Communication Standard have been used as a guideline to manage safety of laboratories and pilot plant. In spite of the implementation of these standards, incidents which result in injuries and property loss are continuously occurring. The implementation of OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard in pilot plant is expected to further reduce the risks of accidents. This paper presents a new system for managing process chemicals, technology and equipment information in pilot plant and the concept is developed based on Process Safety Information (PSI) element of PSM 29 CFR 1910.119(d). It provides organized strategies to manage documentations, communicate information, and written program for maintaining, revising and updating related information. Process and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) is used as a foundation for data management. Implementation of this system at the CO2 Hydrocarbon Absorption System pilot plant as a case study is examined and discussed.

Introduction

Pilot plant occupies a grey area somewhere in the middle of the spectrum from basic research to real process plant production. Some of the items are physically part of research unit operations, whereas others are part of the manufacturing operation. Pilot plant also handles hazardous chemicals such as acids, bases, corrosive, flammable, combustible liquids, oxidizers, water-reactive, explosive, compressed gasses, asphyxiants, toxics, and unstable chemicals. The inventories of hazardous chemicals in pilot plant are typically smaller than commercial plant and considered to be safe without the requirement of extra precautions. However, due to the novel operations and processes which are being used, high operation density of equipment, unproven or changing technology, lack of safety related information at developmental stages, waste generated by operation, and use of sophisticated instruments could give a significant hazardous impact that can cause injuries, fatalities and damage of properties (Langerman, 2008, Langerman, 2009a, Reinart, 2003). As an example, in real process plant, the plant layout and equipment safe siting distance normally follows standards to avoid the damaging effect in the case of the accident. However, pilot plant does not have such a standard to follow and normally the users intend to design a compact pilot plant system. The users normally assume it is safe to operate in a compact design due to small quantity of hazardous chemicals to be handled. Due to high density of operating equipment, the risk of the accident may be significant. The various heating devices installed like furnaces, heaters and electrical equipment in the designated area could increase the risk. In the event of the accident such as fire or explosion, it may involve numbers of equipment that varies from reactors to compressors. These equipment have different hazard potential that installed close with each other will make the accident worst.

Most of the pilot plants are housed inside the buildings. In the case of chemical leaks, the accumulation of vapour could cause major problems. In addition, vapour cloud formation, pressure builds up, asphyxiation and short-term exposure to toxic gases could also endanger people present in the pilot plant. As hazards are considered minimal in the lab, the lab safety is not given priority due to the perception that small quantity of materials would not give a significant hazardous impact to people and environment (Langerman, 2009a). It is therefore, not surprising to know that rate possibilities of the lab accidents in schools and colleges are 100–1000 times greater than at Dow or DuPont as estimated by James Kaufman (Benderly, 2009).

Hazard recognition in laboratories and pilot plant is generally managed under, either Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Laboratory standard 29 CFR 1910.1450 or Hazard Communication standard 29 CFR 1910.1200. According to Mason (2000), pilot plant is dedicated to the development of a potential new production process which is specifically exempted from the OSHA Laboratory standard because it fails to meet the definition of ‘laboratory’. In addition, West (1999) in his studies classified that pilot plant and full-scale production has similarity in terms of typical stages in assessment of chemicals.

Investigation of the pilot plant incidents also reveals that the underlying causes are similar to those found in major full-scale plant accidents. Thus, the approach towards improving safety of pilot plant cannot be different from that of the full-scale plant. Therefore, a mandatory regulation imposed for full-scale plant that effectively controls the high risk operation could also be extended to the pilot plant. One of the established standards is Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard 29 CFR 1910.119. However, PSM applies to industrial processes handling more than 10,000 pounds of hazardous material. Due to rigour requirements and management programmes of OSHA PSM, it is therefore suitable to be implemented at any other plants including pilot plant. The application of the methods outlined in the OSHA PSM to pilot plant operations may provide significant reduction to the risks associated with the operations in this location (Aziz et al., 2012, Langerman, 2009b).

OSHA PSM is designed to provide specific guidance, which is needed to manage operational safety, particularly related to process hazards without excessive operational interference. In response to many major accidents in process plants, OSHA PSM was introduced in 1992 (OSHA, 1992). Many reports have been written on the implementation of PSM on the Chemical Process Industry (CPI) but none for pilot plant scale (Kwon, 2006, Langerman, 2009a).

PSM covers 14 integrated elements, including Process Safety Information (PSI) 29 CFR 1910.119(d) (Mason, 2001a, Mason, 2001b). PSI focuses on process chemicals 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(1), technology 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2) and equipment 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3) management. The compiling of this information will provide a necessary resource to a variety of users, including the team that will perform the Process Hazards Analysis (PHA), the Operating Procedure (OP), and local emergency preparedness planners. However, the usefulness of PSI depends on the accuracy and reliability of the information. It is also essential that all employees know that the information exists, where it is located and how it can be accessed (Aziz et al., 2013).

Updating of process information is quite common in pilot plant, especially when changes involving hazardous raw materials, unproven or changing technology, facility issues, etc. Any changes of these components need to be adequately managed, so that process hazards and risk could be effectively controlled. Even though its implementation would drive a major improvement in pilot plant safety, lacking of a systematic technique for easy adoption of this standard had delayed its application in pilot plant. This paper presents a structured PSI management system, focusing on hazardous chemicals, technology and equipment information in pilot plant that complies with PSM standard.

Section snippets

Compliance with PSI 29 CFR 1910.119(d) requirements

The objective of this section is to provide complete information concerning the management of process chemicals, technology and equipment in the pilot plant operation as required by OSHA PSI 29 CFR 1910.119(d). The framework based on this standard is given in Fig. 1.

The first step in PSI implementation is to check the availability of PSI program. If the information is not available, the end user is required to take necessary actions for the development of the PSI program as required under 29

Case study

To demonstrate the developed concept, a case study was conducted using CO2-Hydrocarbon Absorption System (CHAS) pilot plant under the Research Centre of CO2 Capture (RCCO2C) at Universiti Teknologi Petronas. The pilot plant is used to study the absorption performance of amine solvent in removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the natural-gas stream for pressure of up to 80 bars. Since the pilot plant is handling a flammable gas at a high pressure condition, it is a compulsory requirement by the

Conclusion

This study proposes an OSHA PSM compliance system for pilot plant in order to manage process chemicals, technology and equipment information. The strategies for implementation and process data management are clearly presented in PSI and P&ID frameworks. PSI4MS is developed based on these frameworks that could comply with OSHA PSM-PSI element. It assists end users to manage the process information and to identify gaps in a systematic manner. The conducted case study successfully showed that the

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Research Centre of CO2 Capture (RCCO2C) at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for data sharing that makes this study feasible.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Multifunctional sodium Alginate@ urushiol fiber with targeted Antibacterial, acid corrosion resistance and flame retardant properties for personal protection based on wet spinning

    2022, Applied Surface Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Personal protective equipment (PPE) textile plays a significant role in maintaining the health and safety of people from different professions from potential hazards. They may deal with hazards ranging from laboratory operations to chemical transportation, bacterial infections, and mechanical damage, and act as a barrier to keep the operators away from burns, extensive skin necrosis, and even casualties[1–6]. According to the various applications and performances, PPE textiles are also divided into different types, such as protection for heat and flame retardant, protective clothing for chemical liquids, anti-icing protective clothing, and antibacterial protective[7–9].

  • Evidence-based accident prevention and its application to hazardous chemical storage accident prevention

    2022, Process Safety and Environmental Protection
    Citation Excerpt :

    If the safety information on which decisions are based is flawed, then the decisions based on that information are likely to be flawed as well (Fisher and Kingma, 2002). The chemical industry is no exception, and the problem of missing information exists despite the use of safety data sheets as a source of chemical hazard information (Aziz et al., 2014; Liaw, 2019). In this case, there is an urgent need to remedy the shortcomings of the current accident prevention approaches and develop a new one to reduce the accident rate more effectively.

  • Process safety information, hazard control, and communication

    2020, Process Safety Management and Human Factors: A Practitioner’s Experiential Approach
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text