Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 250, April 2017, Pages 141-145
Psychiatry Research

Patient characteristics associated with aggression in mental health units

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.078Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Age and sex do not differentiate aggressive from non-aggressive patients.

  • Personality and illness-related variables contribute to aggression propensity in inpatients.

  • Interpersonal hostile-dominance is however most strongly associated with aggression.

Abstract

Aggression in mental health units is a significant and pervasive problem. However, the characteristics of patients associated with increased aggression propensity remain unclear and there are few attempts to expand understanding of these characteristics by drawing upon contemporary aggression theory. This study assessed the influence of interpersonal (hostile-dominance) and personality (psychopathy), General Aggression Model-specified (aggressive script rehearsal, attitudes towards violence, and trait anger), and clinical (psychiatric symptoms) factors on aggression during psychiatric hospitalization in 200 inpatients (132 men and 68 women; 19–64 years, M=38.32 years, S.D.=11.13 years). Patient characteristics were assessed on admission using structured interviews and self-report psychological tests. Patients’ files were reviewed and nurses were interviewed after patients were discharged to establish whether patients were aggressive during their hospital stay. Results of univariate analyses showed that higher levels of interpersonal hostile-dominance, psychopathy and aggressive script rehearsal, positive attitudes towards violence, trait anger, and disorganized and excited type psychiatric symptoms all predicted aggression. In the final multivariable logistic regression model, only hostile-dominance remained as a significant predictor of aggressive behavior. This important personality characteristic should be considered in violence risk assessments and aggression prevention strategies.

Introduction

Aggression in mental health units erodes the therapeutic environment, causes psychological and physical harms to patients and staff, and ultimately impairs care (Daffern and Howells, 2002). Research into aggression within mental health units typically neglects theoretical perspectives, distal, environmental and interactional causes in favor of proximal psychiatric symptoms, consistent with an internal model of inpatient aggression (Nijman et al., 1999). In this regard extant research reveals a small but significant association between some psychiatric symptoms and aggression; active positive symptoms of psychosis including delusions, conceptual disorganisation, hallucinations and paranoia appear to have the strongest association with aggression (Swanson et al., 2006, Douglas et al., 2009). Few models of inpatient aggression incorporating personal, interpersonal and environmental factors have been developed (for exception see Nijman et al. (1999), Duxbury and Whittington (2005).

Contemporary aggression theories such as the General Aggression Model (GAM; Anderson and Bushman, 2002) consider aggression to be the product of multiple interacting factors; accordingly, distal (i.e. personality characteristics) and situational factors (i.e. provocation) create an internal state which affects decision-making processes that determine aggressive action. According to the GAM, habitual aggression results from the acquisition of aggression-related cognitions including aggression-related behavioral scripts (i.e. scripts denoting how a person should interact with their environment), attitudes (i.e. a person's beliefs about the acceptability of aggression), and their related affective states (i.e. anger (Anderson and Bushman, 2002)). Interpersonal hostile-dominance (Dolan and Blackburn, 2006) and psychopathy (Hare, 2003) have also been associated with aggressive behavior in inpatient settings (Daffern et al., 2010). Where psychopathy is thought to comprise persistent behavioral deviancy accompanied by emotional-interpersonal detachment (Patrick et al., 2009), interpersonal hostile-dominance describes a pattern of relating to others in a manner that is antagonistic and domineering.

The current study examined the impact of interpersonal (e.g., hostile-dominance), personality (psychopathy), GAM-specified (aggressive script rehearsal, attitudes towards violence, and trait anger), and clinical (psychiatric symptoms) factors on aggression during psychiatric hospitalization. It was hypothesized that (1) the interpersonal and personality, GAM-specified, and clinical factors would all significantly predict inpatient aggressive behavior, and that (2) the addition of interpersonal variables would improve the prediction of aggression beyond clinical, personality and GAM-specified variables.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were 200 patients admitted to two acute units at the Alfred Hospital Inpatient Psychiatry Unit, Melbourne, Australia, between 12th of January 2012 and 10th of October 2012. The sample included 132 men (M=38.12 years, S.D.=11.14 years) and 68 women (M=38.69 years, S.D.=11.20 years) with an age range of 19–64 years (M=38.32 years, S.D.=11.13 years). The average length of hospital stay for participants was approximately two weeks (M=14.59 days, S.D.=15.96 days).

The most common primary

Results

All data was examined for accuracy, missing values, and outliers. A random check of 50 participants’ entered data showed data entry to be accurate. There were no missing values. Four participants were identified as having univariate outlier responses, as indicated by z-scores greater than 3.29. One participant was an outlier on the STAXI-2: TA and three participants were outliers on the PCL: SV. Given the large sample size, the decision was made to retain these participants in the analysis.

The

Discussion

At the univariate level, interpersonal hostile-dominance, psychopathy, aggressive script rehearsal, attitudes towards violence, trait anger, and PANSS Disorganized and Excited symptoms all predicted aggressive behavior. Positive symptoms did not independently predict aggression. Multivariable analysis showed that interpersonal hostile-dominance predicted aggressive behavior independent of clinical and GAM-specified factors. Furthermore, the addition of personality variables significantly

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

None.

References (31)

  • K.S. Douglas et al.

    Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2009)
  • J. Duxbury et al.

    Causes and management of patient aggression and violence: staff and patient perspectives

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2005)
  • T. Grisso et al.

    Violent thoughts and violent behavior following hospitalization for mental disorder

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2000)
  • G.H. Gudjonsson et al.

    Management of psychiatric in-patient violence: patient ethnicity and use of medication, restraint and seclusion

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • R.D. Hare

    The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text