Elsevier

Public Relations Review

Volume 38, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages 430-437
Public Relations Review

How publics use social media to respond to blame games in crisis communication: The Love Parade tragedy in Duisburg 2010

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Crisis communication scholarship has been criticized for its “managerial bias” and for its tendency to marginalize the perspective of publics and audiences. However, the understanding of how publics cope with and interpret crises is crucial for developing the body of knowledge in crisis communication, from both critical and managerial/functionalist perspectives. This case study of the Love Parade crisis in Germany 2010 aimed at exploring how publics perceived the crisis response of the festival organizers and how they used social media to communicate about it shortly after the outbreak of the crisis. A content analysis of 1847 postings at two relevant message boards produced support for the assumption that attributions of cause and responsibility are important predictors of publics’ evaluations of organizations in crisis situations. Findings also revealed that stakeholders actively engage in such attributional inferences spontaneously without being prompted by researchers. The analysis of responsibility perceptions as well as evaluative judgments over time supported the situational crisis communication theory. Blaming others and denying responsibility in the context of a crisis that was perceived as human error accident triggered negative reputational outcomes for the organizations involved in the Love Parade.

Highlights

► A case study of the stampede at the Love Parade festival in Germany 2010. ► 1847 user postings on two online message boards were content analyzed. ► Primarily negative evaluations of crisis response and organizations were found. ► Attributions of cause and responsibility were related to negative evaluations. ► Evidence for external validity of situational crisis communication theory was found.

Introduction

“I am 100 percent willing to take risks” (Arackal, 2009, p. 140), said Rainer Schaller, CEO of the biggest German gym chain McFit Ltd., in an interview in summer 2009. In 2010 he was the organizer of the largest techno music festival in Europe, the Love Parade in Duisburg. During the late afternoon of July 24, a stampede killed 21 young people after mass panic broke out in a tunnel. More than 500 participants were injured. Quickly, the media remembered Schaller's statement and asked him whether cost savings regarding security at the festival were part of that business strategy. He denied and blamed the police for having caused the stampede. The police refused to take responsibility and blamed Duisburg authorities as well as the organizer for security failures. Duisburg authorities and the Mayor of Duisburg pointed to the organizer and the police. It was the beginning of a fatal blame game that presumably will serve in future courses on crisis communication to exemplify major failures in crisis response. This study analyzed how publics used internet forums to discuss this kind of crisis response and to decide about causes and responsibility for the crisis.

The understanding of how publics cope with and interpret crises is crucial for developing the body of knowledge in crisis communication, from both critical and functionalist perspectives. Some scholars advocated an audience-oriented approach to crisis communication and applied attribution theories from social psychology to explain the effects of responsibility attributions on organizational reputation in the context of crises (Coombs and Holladay, 2004, Lee, 2004). They were particularly interested in the link between stakeholder attributions and the effective selection of crisis communication strategies by public relations professionals as proposed by the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) (Coombs, 1995).

However, as most of the research that has been done to test the SCCT relied on experimental designs, artifical stimulus materials and student samples, we do not know to what extent these findings can be regarded as representative for real-world crises. In particular, the relevance of causal attributions and responsibility attributions as well as their impact on stakeholders’ attitudes toward crisis communicators need further external validation. Scholars have usually triggered such attributions artificially by using certain stimulus materials and asking participants about their respective perceptions of causes and responsibility (Försterling, 2001). For crisis communication, however, it is crucial to understand to what extent such attributions are triggered spontaneously among publics during a real crisis and whether they base their evaluations of organizational reputation on perceptions of cause and/or blame.

An ideal non-reactive way to observe publics’ responses to crises has become content analysis of social media content. Social networks or discussion boards are considered to be important forums to track spontaneous crisis discourses from the publics’ perspective, especially in developed countries like the US and Germany. In both countries more than 70% of the population uses the internet and social media adoption is constantly growing (Eimeren and Frees, 2011, Hampton et al., 2011). That crises are important topics on social media was also demonstrated by Facebook's latest list of the most mentioned topics. In Germany, the E. coli outbreak, the plagiarism scandal of the former German Secretary of Defense and the Fukushima crisis in Japan were among the ten most important topics in status mentions in 2011 (Facebook, 2011).

This case study of the Love Parade in Duisburg 2010 aimed at exploring how publics perceived the crisis response of the festival organizers and how they used message boards on the internet to communicate about it shortly after the outbreak of the crisis on the evening of July 24.The case was used to examine the assumptions of SCCT and attribution theory regarding the role of causal attributions as well as their impact on publics’ evaluations of organizational reputation. Hence, these findings should help to assess the external validity of experimental research on SCCT. In addition, the study is supposed to shed light on how crisis stakeholders use social media to evaluate the crisis response of certain organizations or persons in the initial phase of a crisis. The resulting specific research questions were as follows:

RQ1

To what extent do publics use social media such as message boards (RQ1.1) to address questions of cause and responsibility and/or (RQ1.2) to express their general attitudes toward crisis communicators in the context of a crisis such as the Love Parade 2010?

RQ2

Who was held responsible for the Love Parade catastrophe in 2010 and how did attributions of cause and responsibility evolve in the first days of the crisis?

RQ3

Was there a difference regarding communicated attributions between those who identified themselves as participants (or their relatives/friends) of the Love Parade and other users?

RQ4

How did participants and other users assess the crisis response of the responsible parties?

To get a better understanding of the crisis, of the possible causes and of the resulting response of different stakeholders, Section 1 will give a short overview on the history of the Love Parade, the parade in Duisburg in 2010 and the involved stakeholders.

Section snippets

A short history of the Love Parade and the case of Duisburg 2010

The parade was initiated by the techno DJ Matthias Roeinghin 1989. It started as a small party with 150 participants in the streets of Berlin that was officially declared as a political demonstration and turned into an annual festival with steadily rising numbers of visitors from Germany and other countries. At its peak in 1999, 1.5 million people participated. However, the festival organizers increasingly had to face financial problems as the Love Parade was no longer classified as political

Review of the relevant literature

In the last two decades, particularly attribution theories were proven to be useful for explaining how and why stakeholders’ attitudes towards organizations are affected by crises (Coombs and Holladay, 2004, Härtel et al., 1998, Schwarz, 2008). The way stakeholders ascribe causes and responsibility for crises to certain organizations has been in the center of interest, as these attributions were found to have a substantial impact on organizational reputation. Further research showed that

Methodology

To answer the research questions, a quantitative content analysis of two internet forums was conducted. User comments posted during the initial crisis phase between July 24 and August 2 were included. The first one was set up by the radio channel WDR-1Live Radio, which is the biggest radio broadcaster with young target groups in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia and reported live from the festival venue. When this message board was started on the evening of July 24, users were asked to

Findings

RQ1.1

To assess the relevance of attributions of cause and responsibility, the postings were counted according to the number of respective attributions they contained. Thirty-four percent (625) of the postings contained at least one attribution of responsibility for the crisis to one of the involved persons/organizations. Of these 625 posts, 71% blamed only one person/organization. A total of 48% (882) of the posted user comments contained at least one causal attribution. Of these 882 posts, a

Discussion

The aim of this study was twofold. First, some general assumptions of SCCT as well as attribution theory were tested for external validity by using a non-reactive method such as content analysis of social media content. Second, on a more case-specific level, the study was supposed to produce insights into publics’ perception of fatal blame games in crisis response as in the case of the Love Parade in Duisburg.

Substantial evidence was produced for the external validity of the SCCT hypothesis

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Matthias Jahn who helped coding the social media content of this study.

References (22)

  • Arackal, S. (2009). McFit-Chef Rainer Schaller: Ich bin 100 Prozent risikobereit. Handelsblatt. Retrieved from...
  • Y. Choi et al.

    Consumer responses to Mattel product recalls posted on online bulletin boards: Exploring two types of emotion

    Journal of Public Relations Research

    (2009)
  • W.T. Coombs

    Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the appropriate crisis-response strategies

    Management Communication Quarterly

    (1995)
  • W.T. Coombs

    Crisis management: A communicative approach

  • W.T. Coombs et al.

    Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management

  • W.T. Coombs et al.

    The kindle crisis: Exploring ways to evaluate online crisis communication

  • B.v Eimeren et al.

    Drei von vier Deutschen im Netz – ein Ende des digitalen Grabens in Sicht?

    Media Perspektiven

    (2011)
  • Facebook (2011). Memology 2011. Retrieved from...
  • F. Försterling

    Attribution: An introduction to theories, research and applications

    (2001)
  • J.E. Grunig et al.

    Strategic management, publics, and issues

  • Hampton, K.N., Goulet, L.S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. How people's...
  • Cited by (80)

    • Does my Social Media Burn? – Identify Features for the Early Detection of Company-related Online Firestorms on Twitter

      2021, Online Social Networks and Media
      Citation Excerpt :

      Monitoring could enable the principal to detect the emerging asymmetry of information at an early stage, to compensate for any lack of expert knowledge about firestorms, and also to compress the contents of posts to the essential. Initial systematizations and approaches to monitor and identify digital online corporate-related firestorms in social media are already available [18], but these approaches focus primarily on human understanding [13]. Technology supported systems for analyzing and warning against firestorms are not yet used in practice.

    • Crisis collective memory making on social media: A case study of three Chinese crises on Weibo

      2020, Public Relations Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Crisis communication and collective memory research stem from two different fields, yet the phenomena occur simultaneously on social media. Given its affordances of openness, interactivity, and accessibility, social media has become an important channel for seeking, sharing, and creating crisis information during crises (Ki & Nekmat, 2014; Lindsay, 2011; Schwarz, 2012; Austin & Jin, 2018; Zhao et al., 2018), as well as for articulating and disseminating narratives of the past to construct collective memory (Bartoletti, 2011; Birkner & Donk, 2018; Zhao & Liu, 2015). Collective memory has been incorporated into public relations scholarship, for example, to develop the notion of corporate or organizational memory (Rowlinson, Booth, Clark, Delahaye, & Procter, 2010; Stein, 1995; Walsh & Ungson, 1991).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text