Modeling the ponto-medullary respiratory network

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2004.03.020Get rights and content

Abstract

The generation and shaping of the respiratory motor pattern are performed in the lower brainstem and involve neuronal interactions within the medulla and between the medulla and pons. A computational model of the ponto-medullary respiratory network has been developed by incorporating existing experimental data on the medullary neural circuits and possible interactions between the medulla and pons. The model reproduces a number of experimental findings concerning alterations of the respiratory pattern following various perturbations/stimulations applied to the pons and pulmonary afferents. The results of modeling support the concept that eupneic respiratory rhythm generation requires contribution of the pons whereas a gasping-like rhythm (and the rhythm observed in vitro) may be generated within the medulla and involve pacemaker-driven mechanisms localized within the medullary pre-Bötzinger Complex. The model and experimental data described support the concept that during eupnea the respiration-related pontine structures control the medullary network mechanisms for respiratory phase transitions, suppress the intrinsic pacemaker-driven oscillations in the pre-BötC and provide inspiration-inhibitory and expiration-facilitatory reflexes which are independent of the pulmonary Hering–Breuer reflex but operate through the same medullary phase switching circuits.

Introduction

The normal respiratory pattern (“eupnea”) in mammals is generated in the lower brainstem and may involve several medullary and pontine regions (e.g., Lumsden, 1923, Cohen, 1979). Early studies of Lumsden (1923) and a series of later investigations have demonstrated that a removal of the rostral pons or perturbations applied to some areas within this region convert eupnea to apneusis, an abnormal pattern characterized by sustained or significantly prolonged inspiration, whereas the complete removal of the pons results in a gasping-like pattern (Cohen, 1979, Wang et al., 1993, Jodkowski et al., 1994, Morrison et al., 1994, St.-John, 1998). Although some medullary regions, e.g., the pre-Bötzinger Complex can generate a respiration-related rhythm in vitro (e.g., Smith et al., 1991, Rekling and Feldman, 1998, Koshiya and Smith, 1999, Lieske et al., 2000), many researches maintain that the in vitro rhythm essentially differs from eupnea and that the reduced medullary preparations without the pons cannot generate the eupneic pattern (e.g., see Duffin, 2003, St.-John and Paton, 2003a). The reduced medullary preparations cannot also reproduce apneusis, which is consistent with the suggestion that the rhythmogenesis in these preparations differs from the rhythmogenesis of eupnea. These observations support the concept that respiration-related pontine regions are necessary parts of the brainstem respiratory network responsible for the generation of eupnea (Wang et al., 1993, Dick et al., 1994, St.-John, 1998, Rybak et al., 2001, Rybak et al., 2002, St.-John et al., 2002, St.-John and Paton, 2003a, St.-John and Paton, 2003b). However the specific ponto-medullary interactions involved in the generation, shaping and control of the respiratory pattern have not been well characterized. Here we present and analyze a computational model of the ponto-medullary respiratory network and compare its performance under different conditions with both the existing experimental data and the results of our experiments performed for evaluation of some modeling predictions. The model is considered a basis for future interactive modeling-experimental studies of the role of the pons in respiratory rhythm and pattern generation.

Section snippets

Model description

The model (Fig. 1) contains interacting populations of respiratory neurons that have been characterized in the rostroventolateral medulla (RVLM) and pons in vivo. The medullary component of the model includes three major regions: rostral ventral respiratory group (rVRG), pre-Bötzinger Complex (pre-BötC), and Bötzinger Complex (BötC). The pontine component is conditionally subdivided into a rostral (rPons) and caudal (cPons) parts. The neural populations of the rPons in the model are considered

Model performance: comparison with experimental data

The model generates a stable “eupneic” respiratory rhythm and exhibits realistic firing patterns and membrane potential trajectories of individual respiratory neurons (see Fig. 2A). Specifically, the firing bursts of individual ramp-I neurons as well as the bursts of phrenic discharges exhibit “augmenting” patterns (Fig. 2A).

In the model, the pulmonary feedback provides the HB reflex via an increase of excitability of late-I neurons by the direct excitatory input, an indirect excitation through

Experimental studies

The model described above suggests that the medullary post-inspiratory neurons significantly contribute to both the irreversible IOS by inhibition of inspiratory neurons (early-I, ramp-I, late-I) and the regulation of expiratory duration through inhibition of pre-I and aug-E neurons (see Fig. 1). Moreover, the post-I neurons are considered key elements of both phase switching mechanism (IOS and EOS) and operate under control of both vagal feedback and inputs from the rostral pons. According to

Discussion and conclusion

The model presented here was based on a series of assumptions and simplifications concerning both the medullary mechanisms (including these for respiratory phase transitions) and ponto-medullary connectivities. Specifically, many connections in the model, especially these from pulmonary afferents to the ponto-medullary circuitry and between the pons and medulla, have been considered monosynaptic, despite they are most likely polysynaptic; interactions among the pontine populations have not been

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NSF (0091942) and NIH (NS046062-02 and HL072415-01) grants.

References (49)

  • W.M. St.-John

    Neurogenesis of patterns of automatic ventilatory activity

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1998)
  • W.M. St.-John et al.

    Defining eupnea

    Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.

    (2003)
  • W.M. St.-John et al.

    Respiratory-modulated neuronal activities of the rostral medulla which may generate gasping

    Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.

    (2003)
  • F. Bertrand et al.

    Respiratory synchronizing function of nucleus parabrachialis medialis: pneumotaxic mechanisms

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1971)
  • F.J. Clark et al.

    On the regulation of depth and rate of breathing

    J. Physiol. London

    (1972)
  • M.I. Cohen

    Neurogenesis of respiratory rhythm in the mammal

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1979)
  • M.I. Cohen et al.

    Timing of medullary late-inspiratory neuron discharges: vagal afferent effects indicate possible off-switch function

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • T.E. Dick et al.

    Post-hypoxic frequency decline characterized in the rat working heart brainstem preparation

    Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.

    (2001)
  • F.P. Elsen et al.

    Calcium currents of rhythmic neurons recorded in the isolated respiratory network of neonatal mice

    J. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • J.L. Feldman

    Neurophysiology of breathing in mammals

  • D. Frermann et al.

    Calcium oscillations in rhythmically active respiratory neurones in the brainstem of the mouse

    J. Physiol. London

    (1999)
  • A. Haji et al.

    Physiological properties of late inspiratory neurons and their possible involvement in inspiratory off-switching in cats

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2002)
  • F. Hayashi et al.

    Respiratory neurons mediating the Breuer–Hering reflex prolongation of expiration in rat

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • H. Herbert et al.

    Connections of the parabrachial nucleus with the nucleus of the solitary tract and the medullary reticular formation in the rat

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (136)

    • Respiratory rhythm and pattern generation: Brainstem cellular and circuit mechanisms

      2022, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Within the core circuits, the inhibitory and excitatory interactions operate synergistically with the neuronal biophysical properties to coordinate the initiation, maintenance, and termination of the active phases during the respiratory cycle. The interplay of the synaptic and biophysical processes contribute to phase switching by promoting disinhibition and rebound from inhibition, initiating (INaP,), strongly amplifying and sustaining bursting (ICaL, ICAN) (Ramirez et al., 2011; Lindsey et al., 2012; Richter and Smith, 2014), and contribute to burst termination (IK,Ca, ILeak) operating together with the strong synaptic excitation and inhibition (Busselberg et al., 2003; Rybak et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2006). For a graphic representation of these interactions, see (Richter and Smith, 2014).

    • Computational modeling of the control mechanisms involved in the respiratory system

      2020, Control Applications for Biomedical Engineering Systems
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text