ReviewThe effect of team and leadership training of advanced life support providers on patient outcomes: A systematic review
Introduction
Teamwork and leadership are increasingly recognised as important competencies for medical professionals; and as human factors that contribute to patient safety and outcomes.1 Resuscitation efforts are delivered as complex high-stake dynamic competencies and need effective interprofessional team coordination and collaboration to deliver safe and high-quality care. Teaching leadership and teamwork aims to create a highly performing team of healthcare professionals from a group of highly skilled individual clinicians so they can effectively deliver resuscitation to improve patient outcome. Team and leadership training is not only the teaching of better communication, it includes how to guide briefing and debriefing, clarify team roles, install situational awareness and promote effective decision-making. All these components of collaborative practice might promote and develop successful teamwork and leadership.
Providing Advanced Life Support (ALS) is fundamentally a team effort. Teamwork and leadership are therefore expected to make a significant contribution to cardiac arrest patients’ survival outcomes. As early as 1999, Cooper and Wakelam reported that leadership during resuscitation is associated with the team performance.2 They recommended that leadership training should be provided during resuscitation education.2 Therefore, teamwork was integrated in the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) ALS and Immediate Life Support (ILS) courses for healthcare providers. The 2015 ERC guidelines emphasised non-technical skills training (including teamwork, leadership, and structured communication skills training) as an essential adjunct to the technical skills training, especially for those who are expected to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) regularly.3
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Task Force on Education, Implementation, and Teams (EIT) prioritised the question of the effect of team and leadership training during ALS courses on patient and educational outcomes and was the underlying impetus for the conduct of this systematic review.
This systematic review is an update of the “Team and leadership training” systematic review undertaken in 2015 by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), as part of the Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR), and published simultaneously in Resuscitation and Circulation.4, 5
Section snippets
Methods
The protocol for the current review was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Registry for Systematic Reviews (CRD42020164205) and was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.6, 7
Results
After removal of duplicates, the search identified 31 studies (Fig. 1, Table 1a, Table 1b), 17 randomised and 14 non-randomised studies, which included both adults and children, 2 studies in trauma life support (1 RCT and 1 non-RCT) and one study in newborns. The key findings of the included studies are summarised in Table 2.
The risk of bias assessment for confounding ranged from low risk to high risk (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4). The overall certainty of evidence was rated low or very low for
Discussion
The current review provides evidence (albeit with low levels of certainty) to include team and leadership training in ALS education; and confirms the 2015 Consensus of Science and Treatment Recommendation (CoSTR) of the Education Implementation and Teams (EIT) Task Force.
In 2015 the ILCOR EIT Task Force issued a weak recommendation based on low-level quality of evidence to include team and leadership training in ALS courses.5 Although the current review identified many new studies since the
Conclusion
This systematic review identified very low certainty evidence for improved patient outcome if team and leadership training is included as part of a structured ALS course. Nonetheless, this evidence does support a recommendation that team and leadership training should be included as part of ALS courses for healthcare providers.
Funding
No.
Conflicts of interest
KGM and EG are members, and RG is chairperson of the ILCOR EIT Task Force. JF is a member of the ILCOR Scientific Advisory Committee. KGM is ERC Chair-elect; RG is ERC Director of Education and Training, AK is member of the ERC Science and Education Committee BLS.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
A. Kuzovlev: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. K.G. Monsieurs: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. E. Gilfoyle: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. J. Finn: Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Project administration. R. Greif: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing,
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the AHA appointed information specialist for developing the ILCOR C2015 search strategy.
The following ILCOR EIT Taskforce Members are acknowledged as collaborators on this systematic review: Blair L. Bigham, Jan Breckwoldt, Adam Cheng, Jonathan P. Duff, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Taku Iwami, Andrew Lockey, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Joyce Yeung, Peter Morley Chair of the ILCOR Scientific Advisory Committee.
References (41)
- et al.
Leadership of resuscitation teams: “lighthouse leadership”
Resuscitation
(1999) - et al.
Adult advanced life support section Collaborators European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 3. Adult advanced life support
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
Part 8: education, implementation, and teams: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Education, Implementation, Teams Chapter Collaborators
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
J Clin Epidemiol
(2011) - et al.
Assessing the impact of immersive simulation on clinical performance during actual in-hospital cardiac arrest with CPR-sensing technology: a randomized feasibility study
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Code blue pit crew model: a novel approach to in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation
Resuscitation
(2019) - et al.
Team-based simulations for new surgeons: does early and often make a difference?
Surgery
(2018) - et al.
Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
ECCE Study Group assessment of CPR-D skills of nurses in Göteborg, Sweden and Espoo, Finland: teaching leadership makes a difference
Resuscitation
(2007) Developing leaders for advanced life support: evaluation of a training programme
Resuscitation
(2001)