Cholinergic muscarinic M4 receptor gene polymorphisms: A potential risk factor and pharmacogenomic marker for schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Although schizophrenia is a widespread disorder of unknown aetiology, we have previously shown that muscarinic M4 receptor (CHRM4) expression is decreased in the hippocampus and caudate-putamen from subjects with the disorder, implicating the receptor in its pathophysiology.

These findings led us to determine whether variation in the CHRM4 gene sequence was associated with an altered risk of schizophrenia by sequencing the CHRM4 gene from the brains of 76 people with the disorder and 74 people with no history of psychiatric disorders. In addition, because the CHRM4 is a potential target for antipsychotic drug development, we investigated whether variations in CHRM4 sequence were associated with final recorded doses of, and life-time exposure to, antipsychotic drugs.

Gene sequencing identified two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs2067482 and rs72910092) in the CHRM4 gene. For rs2067482, our data suggested that both genotype (1341C/C; p = 0.05) and allele (C; p = 0.03) were associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia. In addition, there was a strong trend (p = 0.08) towards an association between CHRM4 sequence and increased lifetime exposure to antipsychotic drugs. Furthermore, there was a trend for people with the C allele to be prescribed benzodiazepines more frequently (p = 0.06) than those with the T allele.

These data, albeit on small cohorts, are consistent with genetic variance at rs2067482 contributing to an altered risk of developing schizophrenia which requires more forceful pharmacotherapy to achieve a clinical response.

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Although numerous studies have attempted to elucidate the cause of this disorder, the aetiology and pathophysiology remain ambiguous, making it difficult to design optimal treatments. Twin (Cardno et al., 2012) and adoption studies (see Ingraham and Kety, 2000) show that schizophrenia is a heritable disorder; this underpins the hypothesis that the genesis of schizophrenia should be able to be predicted by genetic factors (Agerbo et al., 2012). The genetic liability is further demonstrated by data showing that the risk of developing schizophrenia in the general population is less than 1% and rises incrementally if a single (7%) or both parents (27.3%) have the disorder (Gottesman et al., 2010). However, when considering the genetic load and schizophrenia it is important to note that approximately 90% of adults with schizophrenia do not have a parent with the disorder (Carter et al., 2002) and that only 3.8% of family groups affected by schizophrenia have more than one affected member (Lichtenstein et al., 2006). This data provides strong support for the concept that genetic risk is not the only factor that dictates whether an individual develops the disorder and that schizophrenia occurs in people with a genetic liability for the disorder who have encountered some environmental factor that has triggered the onset of illness (Tsuang, 2000). Thus, in order to better understand the epidemiology of the disorder, significant effort has been invested in identifying the genes that contribute to the genetic liability for the syndrome.

Current antipsychotic agents are effective in a proportion of patients but are not beneficial to many people with the disorder and cause unwanted side-effects (Tandon et al., 2008). Therefore, considerable energy is being expended in developing new drugs to treat schizophrenia. It is, therefore, significant that the muscarinic M4 receptor (CHRM4) is viewed as a potential target to produce antipsychotic effects by a different mechanism of action to currently available drugs (Bymaster et al., 2002). A proof of principle drug trial supported this theory; xanomeline, a CHRM1/M4 preferring agonist (Shannon et al., 2000), reduced levels of psychotic symptoms in a group of people with schizophrenia who were treatment resistant (Shekhar et al., 2008). Importantly, pre-clinical studies (Gomeza et al., 1999, Salamone et al., 2001, Tzavara et al., 2003, Tzavara et al., 2004, Jeon et al., 2010) strongly support the hypothesis that the antipsychotic actions of xanomeline arise from its activation of CHRM4 (Woolley et al., 2009). Given these data, the discovery that muscarinic receptors have more than one potential drug binding site (Clark and Mitchelson, 1976) reinvigorated the development of drugs for these receptors. Importantly, these alternative (allosteric) binding sites, unlike the orthosteric sites, have not been preserved across evolution (Langmead et al., 2008). Therefore, they offer the potential to generate compounds that specifically activate CHRM4. CHRM4 allosteric activators are reported to be efficacious in models used to predict antipsychotic activity, such as conditioned avoidance response (Leach et al., 2010), prepulse inhibition (Chan et al., 2008) and amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion (Brady et al., 2008). These preclinical data add further credibility to the concept that CHRM4 may be a viable drug target for the treatment of schizophrenia.

The involvement of CHRM4 in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia is supported by data showing that CHRM4 are decreased in the caudate-putamen (Dean et al., 2000) and hippocampus (Scarr et al., 2007) from people with the disorder. These data are the basis for our current study designed to determine if changes in the CHRM4 gene sequence are associated with an altered risk of schizophrenia. In addition, given the potential of CHRM4s as a novel target for antipsychotic drug development, and their role in modulating dopaminergic activity (Tzavara et al., 2004, Jeon et al., 2010), we determined whether changes in CHRM4 gene sequence was associated with the pharmacotherapy prescribed for the person.

Section snippets

Tissue collection and donor information

Approval for this study was obtained from both the Ethics Committee of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine and the Mental Health Research and Ethics Committee of Melbourne Health.

Cadavers were refrigerated within 5 h of being found. CNS tissue was rapidly frozen to − 70 °C within 30 min of removal at autopsy. Where death was witnessed, the post-mortem interval (PMI) was the time between death and autopsy. If the death was not witnessed, PMI was taken as the interval midway between the

CHRM4 sequencing

CHRM4 sequencing failed to give conclusive results in two subjects. Thus, this study used DNA from 76 people with schizophrenia and 74 controls. Whilst eight SNPs have been reported in CHRM4 (rs35646260, rs7107481, rs16938505, rs16938502, rs2229163, rs2067482, rs11823766 and rs72910092), we only found two polymorphisms; rs2067482 (NC_000011.9:g.46406767G>A c.1341C>T) and rs72910092 in the 3′ UTR (NC_000011.9:g.46406493C>T c.*175C>T). For rs2067482, the frequencies of the C/C homozygote, C/T

Discussion

In this study we examined the association of CHRM4 polymorphisms with schizophrenia susceptibility and psychotropic treatment. For rs72910092, genotype did not indicate an altered risk for schizophrenia. By contrast, the C/C frequency at rs2067482 was significantly increased in people with schizophrenia. Clearly, this study has a small sample size and the findings must be replicated in a larger cohort. However, a recent genome wide association study reported that a high proportion of their most

Role of funding source

This work was supported by the National Medical & Health Research Council (project grants 509306 and 566967 to ES and BD; Senior Research Fellowship #APP1002240 to BD), the Australian Research Council (Future Fellowship FT100100689 to ES) and the Ministry of Public Administration and Security of Korea (Korean Government Fellowship No. 2008-E-0515 to JYU) as well as Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) from the Victorian State Government. None of the funding sources played any role in the

Contributors

Authors Scarr & Dean designed the study. Authors Um and Cowie were responsible for genotyping and genetic analysis. Author Scarr drafted the manuscript and performed all of the analyses other than those related to the gene frequency and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (JYU). All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

There are no competing financial interests in relation to the work described in this paper.

TFC & JYU report no competing interests. The following authors have previously received remuneration: ES received honorarium from Astra-Zeneca and travel support from GSK. BD received travel support from GSK, honorarium from Pfizer, Eli Lilly and MSD.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Geoff Pavey for his curation of the post-mortem human tissue and Chad Bousman for his in silico explorations. Tissues were received from the Victorian Brain Bank Network, which is supported by the Mental Health Research Institute, The Alfred, Victorian Forensic Institute of Medicine, and The University of Melbourne and funded by Australia's National Health & Medical Research Council, Helen Macpherson Smith Trust, Parkinson's Victoria and Perpetual Philanthropic Services.

References (38)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (2000)
  • M. Atkins et al.

    Chlorpromazine equivalents: a consensus of opinion for both clinical and research applications

    Psychiatr. Bull.

    (1997)
  • A.E. Brady et al.

    Centrally active allosteric potentiators of the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor reverse amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotor activity in rats

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (2008)
  • F.P. Bymaster et al.

    Muscarinic receptors as a target for drugs treating schizophrenia

    Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord.

    (2002)
  • A.G. Cardno et al.

    A twin study of schizoaffective-mania, schizoaffective-depression, and other psychotic syndromes

    Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.

    (2012)
  • J.W. Carter et al.

    A multivariate prediction model of schizophrenia

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (2002)
  • W.Y. Chan et al.

    Allosteric modulation of the muscarinic M4 receptor as an approach to treating schizophrenia

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2008)
  • A.L. Clark et al.

    The inhibitory effect of gallamine on muscarinic receptors

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1976)
  • B. Dean et al.

    Muscarinic1 and 2 receptor mRNA in the human caudate-putamen: no change in m1 mRNA in schizophrenia

    Mol. Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Selective allosteric modulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for the treatment of schizophrenia and substance use disorders

      2019, Advances in Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This same polymorphism was also associated with decreased grey matter in the precentral gyrus of patients with schizophrenia, with no accompanying changes in cortical thickness (Carruthers et al., 2018; Cropley et al., 2015). In addition, two SNPs in the human M4 mAChR gene CHRM4 have been associated with increased risk for schizophrenia (Scarr, Craig, et al., 2013; Scarr, Um, Cowie, & Dean, 2013), implying a potential genetic role for M4, as well as M1, in patients with schizophrenia. Binding studies using postmortem brain tissues from individuals with schizophrenia have also been used to assess alterations in the expression of different mAChRs, specifically M1 and/or M4.

    • Positive allosteric modulation of M<inf>1</inf> and M<inf>4</inf> muscarinic receptors as potential therapeutic treatments for schizophrenia

      2018, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, nAChRs function as excitatory cation channels and occur as either homomeric or heteromeric assemblies of a large family of alpha- (α2-α7) or beta- (β2-β4) subunits (Albuquerque et al., 2009). Cholinergic neurotransmission plays a critical role in a variety of functions, including sensory perception, attention, sleep, motivation, reward, mood, and cognitive processing; therefore, it is not surprising that abnormalities in the cholinergic system are known to contribute to a number of psychiatric and neurological diseases (Bohnen and Albin, 2011; Mufson et al., 2008; Scarr et al., 2013a,b). Numerous clinical and preclinical findings suggest that disruptions in central nicotinic cholinergic transmission may be associated with the symptom manifestation in schizophrenia.

    • Understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: Contributions from the Melbourne Psychiatric Brain Bank

      2016, Schizophrenia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rather the changes observed may be due to a SNP in another gene that is in total disequilibrium with CHRM1 c.267C C>A. We have also reported that patients with schizophrenia who were homozygous C/C at CHRM4 c.1341C C>T have an increased risk of developing the disorder and had an increased lifetime exposure to antipsychotic drugs (Scarr et al., 2013b), possibly due to treatment resistance. Interestingly, the CHRM4 gene is on chromosome 11 in an area of that chromosome that has been identified as showing high genetic variation in a GWAS study of patients with schizophrenia from Germany and the Netherlands (Rietschel et al., 2012).

    • Fatty acid composition and fatty acid binding protein expression in the postmortem frontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia: A case-control study

      2016, Schizophrenia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Age at death, sex, postmortem interval (PMI), and brain pH were examined (Kingsbury et al., 1995). If death had been witnessed, PMI was from time of death to autopsy; if death had not been witnessed, PMI was taken as the mid-point between the times the person was last observed alive and the time found dead (maximum of 5 h) (Scarr et al., 2013). After reviewing the clinical records in each case, a psychiatric diagnosis was made based on DSM-IV criteria and using the Diagnostic Instrument for Brain Studies that allows for a consensus psychiatric diagnosis to be made after death (Hill et al., 1996; Roberts et al., 1998).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text