Elsevier

Science & Justice

Volume 52, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages 42-48
Science & Justice

An assessment of the effectiveness of 5-methylthioninhydrin within dual action reagents for latent fingerprint development on paper substrates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.04.006Get rights and content

Abstract

A critical investigation of 5-methylthioninhydrin (5MTN) is presented as a ‘dual action’ formulation component for the development of latent finger marks on paper substrates. Preparation of a dual action reagent was performed by combining proportions of 5MTN and zinc chloride (ZnCl2) in a pre-mixed solution. Developed prints (deposited on filter paper substrates) could be subsequently visualised in both colour and fluorescence modes. Finger mark quality was graded using a quartered print approach for a number of reagent compositions to deliver an optimised formulation recipe. To fully appraise 5MTN in comparison to currently employed chemistries, this reagent was evaluated against three alternative amino acid selective reagents, ninhydrin, 1,8-diazafluorenone (DFO) and 1,2-indandione/ZnCl2. Six common paper types were used for this purpose and split depletion finger marks from six donors were collected. Finger mark sets were also left for two days or two weeks to show the effect of ageing on development quality. For the first time, it was shown that 5MTN/ZnCl2 is effective as a ‘dual action’ reagent under the United Kingdom climate conditions. However, results presented herein show that the existing recommended chemistries and the 1,2 indandione/ZnCl2 process are all more effective than this new latent finger mark enhancement reagent. In a preliminary sequencing study, we show the effectiveness of the existing DFO–ninhydrin sequence over dual action reagents.

Introduction

The development of finger marks on porous surfaces was revolutionised by the introduction of reagents that react with amino acids. Although ninhydrin was first synthesised in the early 20th century [1], it was not until the 1950s that Oden and von Hofsten [2] noted its potential as a technique for fingerprint development. Testing showed ninhydrin to be more effective than the iodine and silver nitrate techniques and the reagent rapidly became the technique of choice for porous surfaces in particular. Progressive refinements were made to the ninhydrin formulation and processing conditions to make it more effective [3], [4], [5], and the potential for sequential treatment with metal salts was investigated for altering reaction product colour and for producing fluorescent reaction products [6]. Post treatment of ninhydrin with zinc salts was used operationally in the United Kingdom as a means of producing fluorescent marks, detecting additional marks after the ninhydrin treatment alone. The sequential post-treatment approach was superseded mainly by the development of 1,8-diazafluorenone (DFO) [7], which produced marks that were strongly fluorescent under green light. Some amino acid-rich finger marks developed with DFO may be seen as a pinkish coloured product [7]. It is suggested that the DFO method is performed in sequence prior to ninhydrin, since it is more sensitive, and facilitates the visualisation of more ridge detail. However, ninhydrin is usually the method of choice for the treatment of volume crime articles over DFO as it is more affordable, requires shorter development time, and does not necessitate fluorescence examination.

Over the past number of years, many researchers have focused on synthesising new compounds with improved performance over ninhydrin, DFO, or the DFO-ninhydrin sequence. One approach to this goal was the synthesis and comparison of ninhydrin derivatives [8], [9], [10], [11]. In some cases, such derivatives developed differently coloured fingerprints and provided a better contrast with the background than ninhydrin [12]. However no derivative provided a higher sensitivity when compared to their parent compound. For this reason, ninhydrin has not been replaced in the United Kingdom with any of these new compounds. More recently, the development of 1,2 indandione [13] has offered an alternative to DFO and there have been several studies comparing the relative effectiveness of these two reagents [14], [15], [16]. 1,2 Indandione also produces a fluorescent reaction product with amino acids, and for some marks a visible bright pink reaction product can be observed. Another investigated approach has been the development of formulations which produce marks that are simultaneously coloured and fluorescent. Such ‘dual action’ reagents may allow replacement of the two-step DFO–ninhydrin sequence. Nevertheless, in order to obtain such prints, a secondary treatment of the items with a metal salt solution appeared to be necessary [6], [8], [11] and consequently these previously reported formulations could not be considered true dual action finger mark reagents. True dual action reagents have recently been prepared by different study groups. Genipin, a natural compound extracted from the fruit Gardenia jasminoides, was also shown to be a dual action reagent, developing dark blue marks that fluoresced under illumination with green/yellow light [17], [18]. Incorporation of ZnCl2 into 1,2 indandione (1,2 IND) formulations, as opposed to its sequential use in post-treatment, has also been shown to be capable of producing formulations with dual action [14], [15], [16]. Similarly, pre-mixed ninhydrin/ZnCl2 formulations have shown the potential for dual action, but require the use of liquid nitrogen to produce both fluorescent and coloured marks simultaneously[19], making them unfeasibly cumbersome to perform operationally. However, ninhydrin analogues, such as 5-methylthioninhydrin (5MTN), have been shown to develop both coloured and fluorescent marks when used in conjunction with ZnCl2 without the need for the post-development liquid nitrogen cooling step. In a recent comparative study conducted in Israel by Almog and co-workers, a pre-mixed 5MTN/ZnCl2 solution indicated a higher efficiency than ninhydrin in the colour mode and a stronger fluorescence when compared with DFO [20]. However, it is important to note that climatic variation between countries can introduce an added dimension of performance variability for fingerprint development reagents. This variability has been attributed to a direct correlation between the moisture content of the paper and the % relative humidity (RH) in the air [17], although it should be recognised that paper chemistries (acidity/alkalinity, trace metals, types of filler) may also vary between countries and may contribute to the results observed.

The overall aim of this study was to conduct the first investigation of a 5MTN/ZnCl2 reagent under United Kingdom climatic conditions to assess whether it could replace currently employed approaches for finger mark development on representative paper types. The objectives were therefore to optimise a formulation of 5MTN/ZnCl2; to obtain the excitation and emission spectra of the 5MTN/ZnCl2 reaction with amino acids; to carry out comparative studies with existing reagents/procedures and with the 1,2 indandione/ZnCl2 process on a range of paper types; to perform a sequencing experiment in order to assess at what stage of the sequence 5MTN/ZnCl2 could be incorporated to develop the highest cumulative number of marks; and finally to assess 5MTN/ZnCl2 on pseudo-operational articles and compare it to ninhydrin.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

5MTN and 1,2-IND were purchased from Bureau voor Dactyloscopische Artikelen (BVDA International b.v., Haarlem, The Netherlands). Ninhydrin and zinc chloride (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, England). DFO was purchased from Lumichem Ltd. (Belfast, UK). It should be noted that the DFO used in these studies was from a batch manufactured in 2002, although recent comparative work has indicated that this still gives equivalent performance to more recently manufactured DFO batches. A l

Optimisation of the 5MTN/ZnCl2 formulation and processing conditions

Initially, the quality of the marks in both colour and fluorescence mode showed that 0.03% w/v of 5MTN and 0.02% w/v ZnCl2 appeared to be the most effective formulation where 5MTN was the variable (example shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b) segment C). With this solution, 60% of identifiable finger marks developed to grades 3 or 4. Solutions with higher 5MTN contents gave slighter more intensely coloured marks, but were noticeably fainter in fluorescence mode.

For optimisation of zinc salt

Conclusions

This study further demonstrated the ‘dual action’ capability of a pre-mixed 5MTN/ZnCl2 solution in enhancing latent fingerprints on porous paper surfaces. 5MTN appears to be more sensitive than ninhydrin in its reaction with amino acids, since a much lower quantity is required to make a working formulation. Despite this, we have concluded that a 5MTN/ZnCl2 reagent did not perform as effectively as ninhydrin in comparative tests for development of coloured prints. In the same way, DFO-developed

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Ignacio Quinones-Garcia from the Metropolitan Police Service and Nunzianda Frascione from King's College London for their advice in the interpretation of experimental data. Thanks are also extended to Keith Semaine from the Metropolitan Police Service for use of their laboratory. This project was funded by the Home Office Scientific Development Branch.

References (22)

  • R. Grigg et al.

    1,8-diazafluorenone and related compounds. A new reagent for the detection of [alpha]-amino acids and latent fingerprints

    Tetrahedron Letters

    (1990)
  • C.J. Lennard et al.

    Synthesis of ninhydrin analogs and their application to fingerprint development — preliminary results

    Journal of the Forensic Science Society

    (1986)
  • S. Ruhemann

    Cyclic di- and tri-ketones

    Journal of the Chemical Society

    (1910)
  • S. Oden et al.

    Detection of fingerprints by the ninhydrin reaction

    Nature

    (1954)
  • D.A. Crown

    Development of latent fingerprints with ninhydrin

    Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Studies

    (1969)
  • J. Morris et al.

    NFN: an improved ninhydrin reagent for detection of latent fingerprints

    Police Res. Bull.

    (1974)
  • D.F. Hewlett et al.

    An operational trial of two non-ozone depleting ninhydrin formulations for latent fingerprint detection

    Journal of Forensic Identification

    (1999)
  • D. Herod et al.

    Laser detection of latent fingerprint: ninhydrin followed by zinc chloride

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    (1982)
  • J. Almog et al.

    5-Methoxyninhydrin — a reagent for the chemical development of latent fingerprints that is compatible with the copper-vapor laser

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    (1988)
  • J. Almog et al.

    Reagents for the chemical development of latent fingerprints — synthesis and properties of some ninhydrin analogs

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    (1982)
  • J. Almog et al.

    5-Methylthioninhydrin and related compounds — a novel class of fluorogenic fingerprint reagents

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    (1992)
  • Cited by (15)

    • A validation study of the 1,2-indandione reagent for operational use in the UK: Part 3—Laboratory comparison and pseudo-operational trials on porous items

      2018, Forensic Science International
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the issue of whether processing sequences incorporating 1,2-indandione outperform those incorporating DFO have been more variable. In one small scale study conducted using single marks from a range of donors, the sequence DFO-ninhydrin was found to develop more marks overall than the sequence 1,2-indandione-ninhydrin [21]. A more comprehensive study using pseudo-operational material and more extensive processing sequence (i.e. including physical developer followed by Nile Red) found that the sequence incorporating 1,2-indandione/zinc recovered more marks overall than the sequence incorporating DFO [22].

    • An alternative carrier solvent for fingermark enhancement reagents

      2018, Forensic Science International
      Citation Excerpt :

      A pseudo-operational comparative trial between ninhydrin formulations of HFE7100 and AE-3000 indicated that there was no statistical difference between the effectiveness of these two ninhydrin formulations [11,12]. Research has also investigated analogues of ninhydrin to improve the detection of fingermarks by means of better contrast or fluorescence [13–17]. These have largely been replaced by the use of DFO and 1,2-indanedione (1,2-IND) which can be prepared using HFE solvents [18–20].

    • Development of fingermark on the surface of fired cartridge casing using amino acid sensitive reagents: Change of viewpoint

      2016, Forensic Science International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since ninhydrin's discovery as a latent fingermark developing reagent, many researchers were involved in improving the technique. Ninhydrin-based reagents, the ninhydrin analogues, developed by altering the chemical structure of ninhydrin, have met the same limitations as ninhydrin [3–10]. The technique has further advanced with the advent of multivalent metal salts reaction with amino acids and ninhydrin or its analogues.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text