Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volume 654, 1 March 2019, Pages 969-977
Science of The Total Environment

Effect of phthalates on development, reproduction, fat metabolism and lifespan in Daphnia magna

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.158Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Phthalates DEHP, DEP and DBP reduce Daphnia magna body size.

  • Phthalates increase lipid content by inhibiting fatty acid uptake and catabolism.

  • DEHP increases reproduction output.

  • DEP and DBP decrease lifespan.

Abstract

Phthalates are used as plasticizers to increase durability, resistivity and flexibility of plastic materials. The commonly used phthalate, diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) is used in different plastic materials like food packaging, toys and medical devices. DEHP has been linked to different toxicities in humans as well as in animals, and as a consequence other phthalates, including dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and diethyl phthalate (DEP) are being introduced. The increased use of phthalates has resulted in contamination of aquatic ecosystem and it directly threatens the aquatic life. In this study, we analyzed the effects of three phthalates DEHP, DEP and DBP using freshwater organism Daphnia magna. Although, exposure of the three phthalates at 1 and 10 μM did not result any lethality and hatching delay, the chronic exposure for 14 days resulted in reduction of body length. There was enhanced fat accumulation on exposure to all the phthalates, as indicated by oil red O staining. qRT-PCR analysis of genes involved in fat metabolism suggests that the increase in fat content could be due to inhibition of absorption and catabolism of fatty acids. Reproduction analysis showed that DBP and DEP did not alter fecundity but surprisingly, DEHP at 1 μM increased reproduction by 1.5 fold compared to control group. Phthalates also showed negative effect on lifespan as DEP at 10 μM and DBP at both 1 and 10 μM significantly reduced the lifespan. Our data indicates that along with the banned phthalate DEHP, the other substitute phthalates DEP and DBP could also have detrimental effect on aquatic organisms.

Introduction

Phthalates, or, phthalic acid esters (PAEs) are commonly used as plasticizers for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) to increase polymer's flexibility, softness and durability. Phthalates are used as solvents in various industrial and consumer products including toys, medical devices, building materials, automobile parts, electrical cables, and food packaging (Chen et al., 2008; Larsson et al., 2017). The global production of phthalates has reached approximately 6–8 million tons per year and consumption in Europe is approximately 1 million tons per year (Dobrzynska, 2016; Mackintosh et al., 2006; Norrgren et al., 1999). Since phthalates are not chemically bonded to PVC they leach out and enter into the environment (Gao and Wen, 2016). Di-(2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diethyl phthalate (DEP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) are among the most commonly detected phthalates in aquatic environments (Li et al., 2016; Selvaraj et al., 2015). These three phthalates represents 90% of phthalates detected in the Kaveri River water in India with total concentration ranging from 313 to 4640 ng/L with DEHP constituting 57% followed by DEP (22%) and DBP (11%) (Selvaraj et al., 2015). While the maximum allowable concentration of DEHP in drinking water according to WHO guideline is 8 μg/L, the maximum allowable concentration in inland and other surface waters according to USEPA and EU directive is 1.3 μg/L (DIRECTIVE_2013/39/EU, 2013; USEPA, 2012; WHO, 2003). However, the widespread use of phthalates has resulted to its detection in many countries well above the limit. Measured phthalates concentration in the environment range from 0.1–370 μg/L in surface water and 0.1 ng/g–100 μg/g for river sediments (Bono-Blay et al., 2012; Sha et al., 2007; Sung et al., 2003).

The regulations passed so far for different phthalates only restricts their application in specific consumer products. DEHP, the most abundant and widely used phthalate, was the first to be restricted in Europe in 1999 in toys and other childcare articles that can come in direct contact to children's mouth (1999/815/EC, 1999). 2007 EU's REACH regulation banned five more phthalates (DBP, BBP, DINP, DIDP and DNOP) in toys and childcare articles that are available above 0.1% concentration (EUREACH_ANNEX_XVII, 2007). Restriction of the aforementioned phthalates, more specifically DEHP, has led to the increased use of alternatives such as non-restricted phthalates DEP and other non-phthalate compounds (Larsson et al., 2017). DEP, one of the most used phthalates in personal care products is used as a solvent in creams, lotions, baby shampoos and perfumes, results in high levels of infant exposure and has been detected in urine samples of infants (Sathyanarayana et al., 2008). DEP is generally characterized as a non-endocrine active compound with low toxicity (Heindel et al., 1989; Howdeshell et al., 2008) however, recent studies have shown DEP also has adverse effects on humans and animals (Harley et al., 2017; Pradhan et al., 2017; Zhou and Flaws, 2017).

Human and animal studies have shown that phthalates have adverse effects on reproductive organ development. In male rats, DEHP and DBP disrupt fetal testicular testosterone synthesis (Hannas et al., 2011; Parks et al., 2000). The average human exposure is estimated to be between 2.32 and 12 μg/kg/d for DEP, 0.84–5.22 μg/kg/d for DBP and 0.71–4.6 μg/kg/d for DEHP based on urinary biomarker studies from Germany and USA populations (Koch and Calafat, 2009).

Organisms in direct contact with the aquatic system are especially vulnerable to phthalate exposure. Studies have shown that phthalates have various biological effects on aquatic organisms. In crustaceans, decreased locomotor activity and survival has been reported for Gammarus pulex (Thuren and Woin, 1991). In Artemia salina phthalates leads to decreased hatching success (Sugawara, 1974). In fish phthalates can lead to abnormalities in development and reproduction (Carnevali et al., 2010; Sun and Liu, 2017). In lower organisms like protozoans Tetrahymena pyriformis (Jaworska et al., 1995) and algae (Acey et al., 1987) phthalates show negative effect on growth.

Daphnia magna is a well-established in vivo model in toxicological studies, and is the most commonly used system for ecotoxicological testing worldwide (Jordao et al., 2016). D. magna is considered an important species in ecological food webs, as they are principal grazer of algae, bacteria and protozoans and a primary forage for fish (Colbourne et al., 2011). The use of D. magna can help to predict toxicity of phthalate to the aquatic ecosystem (Poynton et al., 2007; Tessier et al., 2000).

Organisms respond to environmental contaminants and stressors by altering their gene expression profiles as a direct or indirect result of exposure (Steinberg et al., 2008). Understanding gene expression analysis associated to physiological and phenotypic alterations can provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms of toxicity. However, most previous studies with D. magna and other aquatic model systems have not explored the mechanism of phthalates toxicity in detail. Studies have mainly been based on phenotypic changes, survival, locomotion and reproduction success and little is known about the effects at the molecular level. Hence, it is important to develop sensitive methods based on gene expression profiles and link this to different physiological end points to better understand the molecular mechanisms. In this study we have used gene expression and physiological end points including reproduction, lifespan, metabolism, hatching, developmental abnormality and survival to compare the toxicity of three phthalates (DEHP, DEP and DBP) and also to make a thorough investigation of phthalates mechanism of action.

The main objective of the present study was to analyze the toxicity of the restricted phthalates DEHP and DBP as well as the non-restricted phthalate DEP and to understand the mechanisms of action using the aquatic crustacean, D. magna in the laboratory under controlled conditions. Our study indicates that phthalates can have negative effect on development, reproduction, fat metabolism and lifespan. The detrimental effect was not only observed for the banned phthalate DEHP, but the substitute phthalates (DEP and DBP) are equally toxic to D. magna.

Section snippets

Chemicals

The phthalate compounds used in this study includes DEP - CAS No. 84-66-2, DBP - CAS No. 84-74-2 and DEHP - CAS No. 117-81-7. The compounds were purchased (Sigma) with stated purities in excess of 99%. To obtain experimental exposure concentration the phthalates were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma). The final assay concentration of DMSO was 0.1%.

D. magna culture, maintenance and exposure

D. magna from Daphtoxkit (MicroBioTests Inc., Belgium) were used to study the effect of phthalates. Ephippia were activated by rinsing in

Phthalates affect development and induce stress response genes

In order to determine the effect of three phthalates, DEHP, DEP and DBP (Fig. 1) in D. magna, survival assay was performed to evaluate if the selected concentrations (1 and 10 μM) of the three phthalates can induce acute toxicity. Exposure of D. magna for 48 h after hatching and 96 h from the egg stage did not result in any lethality (data not shown). Other studies including Brown et al. (1998) and Scholz (1994) also did not find any acute toxicity of DEHP in D. magna. DEHP also does not show

Conclusion

The use of phthalates have increased over the years and consequently their levels are increasing in water bodies. This could lead to serious negative effects on aquatic life if the use of phthalates are not regulated. In this study we have analyzed three phthalates in freshwater organism D. magna using different physiological end points to understand phthalates toxicity as well as mechanisms of action. Except the DEHP mediated reproduction increase, most of the other results obtained in this

Acknowledgements

This study was financed by the Knowledge Foundation, Sweden (20150084) and Örebro University.

We would like to thank Prof. Per-Erik Olsson for the critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References (75)

  • R. Mankidy et al.

    Biological impact of phthalates

    Toxicol. Lett.

    (2013)
  • L. Norrgren et al.

    Effects of potential xenoestrogens (DEHP, nonylphenol and PCB) on sexual differentiation in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

    Aquat. Ecosyt. Health Manag.

    (1999)
  • A. Pradhan et al.

    Germ cell depletion in zebrafish leads to incomplete masculinization of the brain

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (2018)
  • A. Pradhan et al.

    Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and diethyl phthalate disrupt lipid metabolism, reduce fecundity and shortens lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans

    Chemosphere

    (2018)
  • J.Y. Roh et al.

    Toxic effects of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate on mortality, growth, reproduction and stress-related gene expression in the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

    Toxicology

    (2007)
  • K. Sagawa et al.

    Exploring embryonic germ line development in the water flea, Daphnia magna, by zinc-finger-containing VASA as a marker

    Gene Expr. Pattern

    (2005)
  • M.H. Sieber et al.

    Coordination of triacylglycerol and cholesterol homeostasis by DHR96 and the Drosophila LipA homolog magro

    Cell Metab.

    (2012)
  • K.R. Siegfried et al.

    Germ line control of female sex determination in zebrafish

    Dev. Biol.

    (2008)
  • C.E.W. Steinberg et al.

    Genes and environment - striking the fine balance between sophisticated biomonitoring and true functional environmental genomics

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2008)
  • N. Sugawara

    Toxic effect of a normal series of phthalate esters on the hatching of shrimp eggs

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (1974)
  • G.J. Sun et al.

    Developmental toxicity and cardiac effects of butyl benzyl phthalate in zebrafish embryos

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2017)
  • H.H. Sung et al.

    Effects and toxicity of phthalate esters to hemocytes of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2003)
  • S.P. Voght et al.

    Drosophila NPC1b promotes an early step in sterol absorption from the midgut epithelium

    Cell Metab.

    (2007)
  • 1999/815/EC

    Commission Decision of 7 December 1999 adopting measures prohibiting the placing on the market of toys and childcare articles intended to be placed in the mouth by children under three years of age made of soft PVC containing one or more of the substances di-iso-nonyl phthalate (DINP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), di-iso-decyl phthalate (DIDP), di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP), and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP)

    O. J. Eur. Commun.

    (1999)
  • R. Acey et al.

    Growth and aggregation behavior of representative phytoplankton as affected by the environmental contaminant di-N-butyl phthalate

    Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.

    (1987)
  • F. Bono-Blay et al.

    Survey of phthalates, alkylphenols, bisphenol A and herbicides in Spanish source waters intended for bottling

    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.

    (2012)
  • R.S. Boston et al.

    Molecular chaperones and protein folding in plants

    Plant Mol. Biol.

    (1996)
  • M. Bujold et al.

    Nuclear receptor DHR96 acts as a sentinel for low cholesterol concentrations in Drosophila melanogaster

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2010)
  • O. Carnevali et al.

    DEHP impairs zebrafish reproduction by affecting critical factors in oogenesis

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • J.K. Colbourne et al.

    The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex

    Science

    (2011)
  • DIRECTIVE_2013/39/EU

    Directive 2013/39/EU of The European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013

    O. J. Eur. Commun.

    (2013)
  • M.M. Dobrzynska

    Phthalates - widespread occurrence and the effect on male gametes. Part 2. The effects of phthalates on male gametes and on the offspring

    Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig.

    (2016)
  • EUREACH_ANNEX_XVII

    EUREACH entry 51 and 52 of Annex XVII of the REACH regulation

    O. J. Eur. Commun.

    (2007)
  • S.J.S. Flora

    Structural, chemical and biological aspects of antioxidants for strategies against metal and metalloid exposure

    Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.

    (2009)
  • P.M.D. Foster et al.

    Effects of phthalate esters on the developing reproductive tract of male rats

    Hum. Reprod. Update

    (2001)
  • L.E. Gray et al.

    Perinatal exposure to the phthalates DEHP, BBP, and DINP, but not DEP, DMP, or DOTP, alters sexual differentiation of the male rat

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2000)
  • B.R. Hannas et al.

    Dipentyl phthalate dosing during sexual differentiation disrupts fetal testis function and postnatal development of the male Sprague-Dawley rat with greater relative potency than other phthalates

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text