The distribution of total dividend payments in a Sparre Andersen model
Introduction
Consider a continuous-time Sparre Andersen model in which the surplus process is given by where is the initial surplus, is the premium income rate, while the random sum represents aggregate claims. The ’s are i.i.d. random variables with common distribution function (d.f.) () and density function . Denote the Laplace transform (LT) of by . The renewal process denotes the number of claims up to time and is defined as follows.
For , let denote the time when the th claim occurs. Let and for . We assume that are independent and the inter-claim times have a common distribution function and density function . Denote by the LT of . Then .
Further assume that and are independent and that , providing a positive safety loading factor.
In this paper, we assume that the distribution of the inter-claim times is phase-type with representation , where is an matrix with , for , and for any with . Then where is a row vector of length with each element being 1, is the identity matrix, and .
It follows that corresponds to the time to absorption in a terminating continuous-time Markov chain with states, one of which is absorbing. The state space of is and the initial distribution is . The generator of is A detailed introduction to phase-type distributions and their properties can be found in Neuts (1981) and Asmussen (1992), and the references therein.
Note that may not follow the same distribution as the inter-claim times. In the case of an ordinary renewal risk process, follows the distribution , that is, a claim has taken place at time 0 and is the surplus after the claim is paid. For , if , then follows a distribution with density function , where is a row vector with the th element being 1 and all other elements being . In the rest of the paper, we employ to denote the probability measure when the surplus process is an ordinary renewal risk process and employ to denote the probability measure given , i.e., the density function of is . and represent the expectation operators under and , respectively.
Let denote the time of ruin, ( if ruin does not occur). Define as the infinite-horizon ruin probability in the corresponding ordinary renewal risk model. Further, define to be the ruin probability given that the initial state is . Then where . In Section 2, each will be further decomposed into components according to the state at the time of recovery after ruin.
The Sparre Andersen model with Erlang inter-claim times has been studied by Li and Garrido (2004) and Gerber and Shiu (2005), and the references therein. The Sparre Andersen model with phase-type inter-claim times has been studied by Avram and Usábel (2004), Schmidli (2005), Albrecher and Boxma (2005), Ren (2007) and Li, 2008a, Li, 2008b. Li and Garrido (2005) study the discounted penalty (Gerber–Shiu) function in a general renewal process with -family distribution as the inter-claim distribution, which includes the phase-type distribution as a special case, and Albrecher and Boxma (2005) analyze the Gerber–Shiu function through the Laplace–Stieltjes transforms for a semi-Markovian risk model which also includes the Sparre Andersen model with phase-type inter-claim times as a special case.
The barrier strategy was initially proposed by De Finetti (1957) for a binomial model. More general barrier strategies have been studied in a number of papers and books. See Lin et al. (2003), Dickson and Waters (2004), Li and Lu (2007) and Lu and Li (2009), and the references therein for details. The main focus of the mentioned papers is on optimal dividend payouts and problems associated with time of ruin, under various barrier strategies and other economic conditions. Cheung (2007) studies the moments of the discounted dividend payments prior to ruin in a Sparre Andersen model with phase-type claim inter-arrival times in the presence of a constant dividend barrier. The purposes of this note is to extend some results in Dickson and Waters (2004) and Li and Dickson (2006) and to find the distribution of total dividend payments prior to ruin.
Section snippets
The decomposition of ruin probabilities
In this paper, we allow the surplus process to continue if ruin occurs and define to be the time of the first upcrossing of the surplus process through level zero after ruin. This time is also called the time of recovery in the literature, see Gerber and Shiu (1998). Since we assume that the loading factor is positive, it is certain that the surplus process will attain this level. Define to be the probability of ruin with the state
Main results
Now we consider the surplus process (1) modified by the payment of dividends. When the surplus exceeds a constant barrier , dividends are paid continuously so the surplus stays at the level until a new claim occurs. Let be the surplus process with initial surplus under the above barrier strategy, i.e., where is the aggregate dividends paid by time .
Define to be the time of ruin. Then is the total dividend
References (19)
- et al.
On the discounted penalty function in a Markov-dependent risk model
Insurance: Mathematics & Economics
(2005) - et al.
The maximum surplus before ruin in an Erlang() risk process and related problems
Insurance: Mathematics & Economics
(2006) - et al.
On ruin for Erlang risk process
Insurance: Mathematics & Economics
(2004) Phase-type representation in random walk and queuing problems
The Annals of Probability
(1992)- et al.
Ruin probabilities and deficit for the renewal risk model with phase-type inter-arrival times
ASTIN Bulletin
(2004) Discussion of “Moments of the dividend payments and related problems in a Markov-modulated risk model”
North American Actuarial Journal
(2007)Su un’impostazione alternativa dell teoria colletiva del rischio
Transactions of the XV International Congress of Actuaries
(1957)- et al.
Some optimal dividends problems
ASTIN Bulletin
(2004) - et al.
On the time value of ruin
North American Actuarial Journal
(1998)