Elsevier

Thermochimica Acta

Volume 650, 10 April 2017, Pages 106-113
Thermochimica Acta

Viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity of silicon dioxide–ethylene glycol transparent nanofluids: An experimental studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.02.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Thermophysical properties of transparent silicon dioxide–ethylene glycol nanofluids was investigated.

  • SiO2-EG nanofluids exhibit Newtonian nature.

  • Viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity increase linearly with volume fraction of particles in examined range.

  • Evaluation of the heat transfer performance and thermo-electrical conductivity (TEC) ratio was presented.

Abstract

Nanofluids are novel engineering materials with many potential industrial applications, particularly in the processes of heat exchange. The paper presents the results of experimental investigation of viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity of transparent suspensions of silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles in ethylene glycol (EG). Dynamic viscosity of samples was measured in shear rate range from 100 s−1 to 1000 s−1. Thermal and electrical conductivity of nanosuspensions with various fractions of particles was measured. All measurements were conducted at constant temperature 298.15 K. It was presented that with increasing concentrations of nanoparticles in nanofluids all investigated properties increase linearly in examined volume fraction range. Finally evaluation of the heat transfers performance, and thermo-electrical conductivity (TEC) ratio based on obtained results was presented.

Introduction

In 1995, S. Choi presented a paper in which he demonstrated an increase of the thermal conductivity in the suspensions of nanoparticles, which he described as “nanofluids” [1]. From that moment, the thermal properties of such materials are intensively explored all around the world, leading to the development of numerous industrial applications [2], [3], [4]. Some of the main areas of potential use of the nanofluids are the heat exchange process in the buildings [5], the machinery industry [6] and the nuclear power engineering [7]. Another advantage of the nanofluids is a possibility to use them in the alternative energy sources [8] and solar systems [9], [10], [11], [12], the significance of which can not be overestimated in our era of an increasing need of the, “clean” energy. A separate group of nanofluids are the ferrofluids, which also have a lot of sophisticated applications [13] due to their unique properties.

There are two types of the methods of nanofluid preparations: the one-step and the two-step [14] ones. The one-step methods consist in the preparation of nanoparticles directly in the base fluid, and are used most often in the case of metallic nanoparticles. The two-step methods rely on the preparation of nanoparticles (first step), and then their dispersion in a liquid base (second step). In the case of two-step methods it is necessary to use mechanical methods to break up agglomerates. The mechanical mixing and sonication are the most common used techniques.

The mainstream of research of the characteristics of nanofluid is its thermal conductivity. Numerous studies are conducted in both experimental and theoretical fields on the thermal conductivity enhancement in nanofluids [15]. This leads to formation of new complex theoretical models of this issue [16]. Unfortunately, we still do not have a coherent theoretical model describing the mechanism of thermal conductivity of nanosuspensions. Certain models may describe some of materials correctly but can not be entirely applicable to others.

However, one should keep in mind that the practical application of nanofluids is not be possible without deep knowledge of their mechanical properties and, in particular, the viscosity. This is another area of intensive studies of the nanofluids. As in the case of thermal conductivity, theoretical [17] and experimental [18] studies of the rheological properties of nanosuspensions are conducted now. Great efforts have been made to develop a coherent theoretical model describing the viscosity of nanofluids but at the moment there are only models [19] which can be applied only to some individual cases.

One of the areas of study of the physical properties of nanofluids is their electrical properties, which are equally important but probably underestimated by researchers as compare to their thermal or rheological properties. Among the electric properties, the electrical conductivity is most frequently studied. The electric conductivity of nanofluids tends to increase, like thermal conductivity, with an increasing volume concentration of nanoparticles in the base fluid. However, such studies are rather scarce, and the further work in this area is still needed.

Some studies of the thermophysical properties of nanofluids containing SiO2 nanoparticles have been already performed. For example, Kulkarni et al. [20] described the heat transfer properties of ethylene glycol/water mix based nanofluids. The dependence of viscosity on the particle diameter and an increase of the heat transfer coefficient were reported. Dutta and De [21] presented the results of experimental studies of electrical properties of polypyrrole (PPY–SiO2) nanocomposites at various temperatures and concentrations of the nanoparticles. Konakanchi et al. [22] measured pH of the suspension of SiO2 in the mixture of propylene glycol with water. They observed that the pH of nanofluid increases with an increase of the volume fraction of particles. Talib et al. [23] presented the results of thermophysical measurements of dispersions of SiO2 nanoparticles in ethylene glycol/water mixture, and described the potential use of this materials in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell cooling. Shahrul et al. [24] and Anoop et al. [25] evaluated the possibility of using SiO2–water nanofluids in heat exchange processes and compared the properties of this material with the other water based nanofluids. Sharifpur et al. [26] carried out studies of an effect of the ultrasound energy densities on the electrical conductivity SiO2–EG nanofluids with various volume concentrations in temperature range from 20 to 70 °C. They showed that an increase of the energy density causes the decrease in electrical conductivity of SiO2–EG nanofluids. Haghtalab et al. [27] present the results of experiments on absorption of the carbon dioxide in the water-based nanofluids of spherical SiO2 nanoparticles.

This paper presents the results of experimental studies of viscosity and thermal and electrical conductivity of SiO2–EG.

Section snippets

SiO2 nanoparticles

The nanoparticles used in the studies are commercially available They were produced by PlasmaChem GmbH (Berlin, Germany) with >99.8% purity, catalog number PL-SiOF-25g. The particle size distribution declared by the manufacturer is 7—14 nm, and the specific surface over 200 m2 g−1. The thermal conductivity of SiO2 is 1.38 W m−1 K−1, the electrical conductivity 10−21μS cm−1, and the value of density 2220 kg m−3, as presented in [23]. According to available literature, the specific heat of silicon dioxide

Viscosity

The results of measurement of viscosity as a function of shear rates, are summarized in Table 2.

Fig. 3A presents the flow curves of SiO2–EG nanofluids with various volume fractions of particles at constant temperature 298.15 K. It can be seen that the shear stress increases linearly with the shear rate. The liquids which have such character of the flow are usually called Newtonian fluids. The Newtonian model assumes that the shear stress is proportional to the shear rate, and the proportionality

Conclusions

This paper presents the results of our experimental studies of viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity of various volume fraction suspensions of silicon dioxide in the ethylene glycol.

It is shown experimentally that SiO2–EG nanofluids exhibit the Newtonian fluid behavior, in which the viscosity increases with the fraction of particles in suspension. It is shown that in the measured volume fraction range the viscosity enhancement is linear with increasing concentration of particles, and

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank prof. Vitalii Dugaev (Rzeszow University of Technology) for proofreading the manuscript and dr. Piotr Sagan (University of Rzeszow) for the SEM picture of nanoparticles.

References (65)

  • I. Shahrul et al.

    Experimental investigation on Al2O3-w, SiO2-w and ZnO-w nanofluids and their application in a shell and tube heat exchanger

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2016)
  • K. Anoop et al.

    Thermal evaluation of nanofluids in heat exchangers

    Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2013)
  • A. Haghtalab et al.

    Absorption and solubility measurement of CO2 in water-based ZnO and SiO2 nanofluids

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (2015)
  • Z. Nan et al.

    Calorimetric investigation of excess molar heat capacities for water + ethylene glycol from t = 273.15 to t = 373.15 k

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2002)
  • G. Żyła

    Thermophysical properties of ethylene glycol based yttrium aluminum garnet (Y3Al5O12) nanofluids

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2016)
  • G. Żyła et al.

    Experimental studies on viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity of aluminum nitride-ethylene glycol (AlN-EG) nanofluids

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2016)
  • M. Pastoriza-Gallego et al.

    Thermophysical profile of ethylene glycol-based ZnO nanofluids

    J. Chem. Thermodyn.

    (2014)
  • A. Mariano et al.

    Co3O4 ethylene glycol-based nanofluids: thermal conductivity, viscosity and high pressure density

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2015)
  • P.K. Namburu et al.

    Viscosity of copper oxide nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol and water mixture

    Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci.

    (2007)
  • W. Yu et al.

    Experimental investigation on the thermal transport properties of ethylene glycol based nanofluids containing low volume concentration diamond nanoparticles

    Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects

    (2011)
  • X. Li et al.

    Rheological behavior of ethylene glycol-based SIC nanofluids

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2015)
  • A. Mariano et al.

    Thermal conductivity, rheological behaviour and density of non-Newtonian ethylene glycol-based SnO2 nanofluids

    Fluid Phase Equil.

    (2013)
  • G. Żyła et al.

    Huge thermal conductivity enhancement in boron nitride–ethylene glycol nanofluids

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2016)
  • X. Li et al.

    Stability and enhanced thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol-based SiC nanofluids

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2015)
  • W. Yu et al.

    Investigation of thermal conductivity and viscosity of ethylene glycol based ZnO nanofluid

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2009)
  • K.K. Sarojini et al.

    Electrical conductivity of ceramic and metallic nanofluids

    Colloids Surf A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspect.

    (2013)
  • I. Zakaria et al.

    Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity of Al2O3 nanofluid in water-ethylene glycol mixture for proton exchange membrane fuel cell application

    Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2015)
  • S. Choudhary et al.

    Ionic conduction in binary mixtures of dipolar liquids

    J. Mol. Liquids

    (2012)
  • L. Shen et al.

    Solvothermal synthesis and electrical conductivity model for the zinc oxide-insulated oil nanofluid

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2012)
  • S. Halelfadl et al.

    Efficiency of carbon nanotubes water based nanofluids as coolants

    Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci.

    (2014)
  • X. Li et al.

    Thermo-physical properties of water and ethylene glycol mixture based SiC nanofluids: an experimental investigation

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2016)
  • X. Li et al.

    Experimental study on the thermo-physical properties of diathermic oil based SiC nanofluids for high temperature applications

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text