Bridging social capital matters to Social TV viewing: Investigating the impact of social constructs on program loyalty

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.05.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A STV model examines relationships between social factors, program commitment and loyalty.

  • Bridging social capital positively influences STV program commitment and loyalty.

  • Social presence increases STV program commitment but sociability has no effect.

  • Perceived sociability and social presence of STV increases bridging social capital.

  • Bridging social capital is mediator between sociability and STV program loyalty.

Abstract

Social TV (STV) that utilizes social media to create an interactive backchannel for video viewing increasingly attracts social audiences. This national web survey in Singapore was conducted to investigate 600 social media users with online video discussion experiences. The STV model examines the relationships and mediation effects among social constructs (i.e. perceived sociability, perceived social presence, and bridging social capital), program commitment, and program loyalty. Structural equation modeling results show that bridging social capital is positively associated with commitment and loyalty to programs. In addition, perceived social presence increases program commitment, but perceived sociability has no effect. Perceived sociability, as a predictor of social presence, and social presence itself are positive factors affecting bridging social capital. Moreover, bridging social capital significantly mediates the relationships between perceived sociability and program loyalty. Theoretical and practical implications for STV’s social constructs and program loyalty are discussed.

Introduction

Social TV (STV) is the convergence between social media and TV, which has increased viewers’ connectivity and content engagement via social media interactions (Proulx and Shepatin, 2012). Social media provides backchannels to empower audiences for two-way interactivity during video viewing (Lin and Chiang, 2017). The affordances of social media allow users to connect with others beyond connected social groups or nearby locations (Ariel and Avidar, 2015). Twitter discussions about TV programs and their sponsors are able to garner large audiences and trigger desirable actions related to TV viewing such as improved ratings (Nagy and Midha, 2014). According to Quintas-Froufe and Gonzalez-Neira (2014), STV interactions generate a social audience, a fragmentation of TV audiences discussing video content on social media; these exchanges create social media communities about programs can foster viewer loyalty and show longevity. Nagy and Midha (2014, p.448) categorized these “earned audiences” into active viewers (responding to TV programs or advertising via social media) and passive viewers (exposing themselves to online conversations). The majority of STV viewers tweeted to maintain community connectivity (Mouton, 2014). Realizing the importance of participatory viewership, TV producers and advertisers make increasing efforts to encourage users’ sharing of TV-related content on social media and forming of fan communities (Highfield et al., 2013) to influence users’ content selection and viewing habits.

Multiscreen videos and new TV-like services that shape audiences’ cross-platform viewing behaviors have been flourishing in recent years (Lin, 2019). To reflect the latest audiovisual ecosystem, this study defines STV as using social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, and mobile instant messages or applications) to discuss conventional TV programs or professionally made online videos (e.g., Netflix and YouTube channels). Apart from the audiovisual industry’s attention to STV, several scholars have examined various factors (e.g., innovation characteristics and personal traits) affecting attitudes of STV users (Shin, 2013). Social affordances are salient predictors for users’ acceptance and intention to use STV (Shin and Kim, 2015, Shin, 2017). Past STV system studies found that perceived sociability could enhance user participation and support social interaction (Chorianopoulos and Lekakos, 2008, Geerts and Grooff, 2009), while recent research identified perceived social presence as a key factor affecting viewers’ commitment and loyalty of using social media for discussing TV channels (Hwang and Lim, 2015). Social exchange crucially determines intention to use STV applications (Krämer et al., 2015). Given that STV users, regardless of geographical or socioeconomic proximity, tend to exchange video-related opinions with others via Twitter or Facebook, they are likely to experience bridging social capital, which results from the use of social media in reaching out to weak-ties and obtaining informational varieties through heterogeneous networks (Ellison et al., 2007).

Scholars in western countries have extensively scrutinized the impacts of STV for a number of years, after the TV industry discovered how social media interactions (e.g., Twitter and Facebook discussions) could boost TV ratings and improve user engagement. However, this important topic has been relatively overlooked in Asian context till 2015. This present study was the first in Singapore. To the best of our knowledge, scholarly effort has scarcely focused on the relationship between social affordances of STV and social capital. None has regarded social capital as a mediator shaping STV users’ viewing outcomes. Additionally, past STV studies did not focus on investigating STV users viewing professionally made videos (e.g, broadcasters, Cable TV, Internet TV, mobile TV, or OTT videos) while using social media sites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, or Whatsapp). Accordingly, this study constructed a theoretical framework to analyze a national web survey dataset with two-fold research purposes to fill the gaps: First, it investigates the associations between STV’s social affordances (e.g., sociability and social presence) and bridging social capital. Second, the framework also studies the relationship of STV’s social affordances and bridging social capital with STV viewer loyalty and program commitment, two crucial concepts in marketing communication for the improvement of viewership and audience engagement. The findings will remain valid because using STV gains increasing popularity over the past few years and will capture the interest of academics and media practitioners. On the one hand, this study untangles the complex interrelationship of social constructs associated with users’ perceptions of STV and their effects on viewers’ loyalty to professionally made videos. The findings extend both Social Capital Theory and Social Presence Theory. On the other hand, the users’ insights will shed light to the significance of social affordances in creating, promoting, and distributing multiscreen video contents and services, which will assist video operators and advertisers in engaging numerous social audiences and making strategies to increase viewer loyalty to cultural products or brands.

Using a roadmap of what is to come next, the following literature review section elaborates on previous research related to this STV study’s key variables (sociability, social presence, bridging social capital, commitment, and program loyalty) and proposes empirically testable hypotheses. The third section describes the web survey’s data collection, and specifies measurements and data analysis. The fourth section presents the results of the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and mediation analysis. The final section concludes and discusses salient findings, as well as states implications and limitations.

Section snippets

Literature review

When MIT Technology Review selected STV as one of the breakthrough emerging technologies in 2010, it referred to an integrated system for shared TV experiences (Chorianopoulos and Lekakos, 2008). After the fast diffusion of social media, STV was later transformed into a convergent augmentation of using Twitter or Facebook while video viewing, which gained increasing attention from industry players and academia (Hwang and Lim, 2015, Krämer et al., 2015, Lin and Chiang, 2017, Proulx and Shepatin,

Data collection and respondent profile

Singapore, which ranked top of the Word Economic Forum's Networked Readiness Index, is regarded as one of the digital advanced countries (DNA, 2017). According to hashmeta, Singapore has 85% social media penetration rate in 2019 and 70% of Singaporeans are active social media users (Nhu, 2018). The same report shows that YouTube is the most viewed social media platform, with four million users in the country. Under conservative traditional media under tight content regulation, lots of

Descriptive findings

In general, the respondents spent an average of 10.62 hours (SD = 14.20) on using social media for video-related matters on a weekly basis. They primarily used mobile instant messaging applications (e.g. WhatsApp, WeChat, and Line) (M = 3.92 / 5, SD = 0.95) and SNS (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram) (M = 3.52 / 5, SD = 1.05) to discuss with others during video viewing. Respondents’ social media interactions during video viewing occurred most frequently when they watched news (M = 3.28 / 5,

Discussion and conclusion

As emerging STV phenomenon has a steady but gradual growth in Singapore, this study pioneers the investigation on the relationships and mediation effects among STV social affordances (i.e. bridging social capital, social presence, and perceived sociability), program commitment and loyalty. The national web survey focuses on examining STV users with prior experiences in using social media while viewing professionally made multiscreen videos (e.g., broadcasters, Cable TV, and OTT). This research

Declaration of Competing Interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Trisha T.C. Lin (Ph.D., University of Hawaii, Manoa) is the associate professor at Department of Radio and Television, National Chengchi University, Taiwan. She is also the associate researcher of Taiwan Institute for Governance and Communication Research. In addition to a former broadcasting media professional, she previously worked as the assistant professor at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Her research interests focus on examining emerging interactive digital media with two

References (78)

  • M. Oztok et al.

    Capitalizing on social presence: the relationship between social capital and social presence

    Internet Higher Educ.

    (2015)
  • D.H. Shin

    Defining sociability and social presence in Social TV

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2013)
  • D.H. Shin

    The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning: technological and affective affordances in virtual reality

    Telematics Inform.

    (2017)
  • C. Steinfield et al.

    Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis

    J. Appl. Dev. Psychol.

    (2008)
  • J.C. Wang et al.

    Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: a social capital perspective

    Decis. Support Syst.

    (2009)
  • N.J. Allen et al.

    The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitments to the organization

    J. Occup. Psychol.

    (1990)
  • Y. Ariel et al.

    Information, interactivity, and social media

    Atlantic J. Commun.

    (2015)
  • F. Biocca

    The cyborg's dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments

    J. Comput.-Med. Commun.

    (1997)
  • F. Biocca et al.

    Defining and measuring social presence: contribution to the networked minds theory and measure

    Proc. Presence

    (2002)
  • P.B. Brandtzæg

    Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites

    Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.

    (2010)
  • H.B. Brosius et al.

    The loyalty of television watching: how consistent is TV viewing behavior?

    J. Broadcast. Electron. Media

    (1992)
  • P.Y. Chen et al.

    Measuring switching costs and determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry

    Inf. Syst. Res.

    (2002)
  • K. Chorianopoulos et al.

    Introduction to Social TV: enhancing the shared experience with Interactive TV

    Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact.

    (2008)
  • comScore. (2015, July). Social media demographic profile. Retrieved from comScore Media Metrix...
  • L. Dabbish et al.

    Fresh faces in the crowd: turnover, identity, and commitment in online groups

  • A.S. Dick et al.

    Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework

    J. Acad. Mark. Sci.

    (1994)
  • Digital News Asia (DNA). (2017, February 16). Singapore consumers digitally savvy; demand secure, afforable,...
  • J. Donath et al.

    Public displays of connection

    BT Technol. J.

    (2004)
  • N.B. Ellison et al.

    The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students' use of online social network sites

    J. Comput. Mediated Commun.

    (2007)
  • N.B. Ellison et al.

    Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled commuication practices

    New Media Soc.

    (2011)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    J. Mark. Res.

    (1981)
  • G. Fullerton

    When does commitment lead to loyalty?

    J. Serv. Res.

    (2003)
  • D. Geerts et al.

    Supporting the social uses of television: sociability heuristics for social TV. CHI’09

    Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2009)
  • M.S. Granovetter

    The strength of weak ties

    Am. J. Sociol.

    (1973)
  • C. Greenhow et al.

    Help from my “friends”: social capital in the social network sites of low-income students

    J. Educ. Comput. Res.

    (2011)
  • M. Guo et al.

    Predictors of social television viewing: how perceived program, media, and audience characteristics affect social engagement with television programming

    J. Broadcast. Electron. Media

    (2015)
  • A. Gustafsson et al.

    The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention

    J. Market.

    (2005)
  • C. Heeter

    Being there: the subjective experience of presence

    Presence

    (1992)
  • T. Highfield et al.

    Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom: the Eurovision Phenomenon

    Inf., Commun. Soc.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Social TV viewing during the COVID-19 lockdown: The mediating role of social presence

      2021, Technology in Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given that the nature of social TV viewing can create a feeling of virtual togetherness [43], extant research highlights the importance of social presence in social TV viewing experiences. Lin and Chiang [43] examined how social factors such as social presence affect social TV viewing experiences. The study found that social presence is positively associated with bridging social capital among social TV viewers and TV program commitment, which naturally lead to program loyalty.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Trisha T.C. Lin (Ph.D., University of Hawaii, Manoa) is the associate professor at Department of Radio and Television, National Chengchi University, Taiwan. She is also the associate researcher of Taiwan Institute for Governance and Communication Research. In addition to a former broadcasting media professional, she previously worked as the assistant professor at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Her research interests focus on examining emerging interactive digital media with two approaches: socio-technical system analysis and socio-psychological user research. She published journal articles regarding mobile media and communication, new media convergence, digital journalism and health communication.

    Yi-hsuan Chiang (Ph.D. National Taiwan Normal University) is an associate professor at Radio-TV-Film, Shih Hsin University, Taiwan. Her research interests are in the areas of new media user behavior, including social media, mobile communication, and big data. She also served as a consultant in InsightXplorer and BeamMedia for digital media research and infographics.

    1

    Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7287-1150.

    View full text