Full Length ArticleEvaluation of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to predict the quality of anticoagulation control in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with vitamin K antagonists: Findings from the RIETE registry
Introduction
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and constitutes the third cause of morbi-mortality in the USA and Europe [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Currently, the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first choice of therapy in VTE patients without cancer [5,6] and in those with atrial fibrillation (AF) [7]. They have all demonstrated a similar efficacy than the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and a lower risk for bleeding in randomized trials. In addition, real-life studies have confirmed these results [8] although up to 24% of patients [9,10] were not represented in these trials [11,12].
The VKAs have a narrow therapeutic window, and require periodic INR monitoring and frequent dose adjustments to maintain the intensity of anticoagulation. The efficacy and safety of VKAs depend on the so-called time in therapeutic range (TTR), which is measured by the Rosendaal method (that takes into account the time interval between INR determinations) [13] or the direct method [14]. In patients with VTE, TTR values <70% have been associated with a higher frequency of vascular events, bleeding and mortality [15]. In randomized trials, the TTR is usually below recommended: around 64% in AF patients [16,17] and 57–63% [18] in VTE patients. In real-life studies it is even lower: 57–61% [19]. Thus, a reliable tool to identify patients at risk of poor INR control would be very useful. In patients with foreseeable poor INR controls, physicians may implement measures for better control or consider switching to DOACs.
The SAMe-TT2R2 [20] score is a simple score based on clinical risk factors (Sex, Age, Medical history, Treatment, Tobacco and Race), to discriminate patients with low or high probability of poor INR control (TTR <65%). It was first validated in patients with AF [7,21,22], and it has been evaluated in VTE patients in a few studies, with conflicting findings [[23], [24], [25], [26]].
Section snippets
Methods
RIETE is an ongoing, multicenter registry of consecutive patients with objectively confirmed, acute VTE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02832245). It started in Spain in 2001, and after 6 years, it expanded to other countries. Currently, RIETE includes 254 collaborating centres in 27 countries.
Results
Among 5131 patients initially screened, we obtained a second sample excluding the INR determinations of the first month, leaving a final sample of 3893 patients. Median follow-up was 4.6 months (IQ 2.4–9-6). TTR was 53.2% by direct method and 57.1% by Rosendaal method. Mean age was 66 years ±16.8 (52% men). Patients initially presented with PE in 41% of cases, DVT alone in 35%, both conditions in 23%. During follow-up, the recurrence rate was 2.1% and bleeding rate 6.5% (major bleeding 1.4%).
Discussion
The SAMe-TT2R2 score was initially obtained from a population of 1000 patients with AF, with a mean TTR of 64%, and a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. External validation was also performed in patients with AF [20], showing predictive capacity of poor anticoagulation quality with high scores (>2 points). When studying the score in other populations with AF, lower discrimination power was observed [21].
In most countries, VKA are still the most commonly used drugs for the long-term treatment of VTE.
Conclusion
In patients with VTE treated with VKA, the SAMe-TT2R2 score discriminated those patients with high probability of obtaining poor INR control, but with a low predictive capacity. Further studies are required to assess the usefulness of the score in clinical decision-making. It could also be useful to design a new score, similar to the SAMe-TT2R2, obtained from a cohort of patients with VTE evaluating parameters not included in the original score (such as VTE location, use of statins, existence
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to Sanofi Spain for supporting this Registry with an unrestricted educational grant. We also thank the RIETE Registry Coordinating Center, S&H Medical Science Service, for their quality control data, logistic and administrative support.
References (29)
- et al.
Venous thromboembolism in Spain. Comparison between an administrative database and the RIETE registry
Eur J Intern Med.
(2008) - et al.
Venous thromboembolism: a public health concern
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(2010) - et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report
Chest.
(2016) - et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: CHEST guideline and expert panel report
Chest.
(2018) What have we learned from real-world NOAC studies in venous thromboembolism treatment?
Thromb. Res.
(2018)- et al.
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial
Lancet.
(2010) - et al.
Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Thromb. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Meta-analysis to assess the quality of international normalized ratio control and associated outcomes in venous thromboembolism patients
Thromb. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Factors affecting quality of anticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin: the SAMe-TT (2) R (2) score
Chest.
(2013) - et al.
Use of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to predict anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: a review
Heart Rhythm.
(2018)
Relationship of the SAMe-TT (2) R (2) score to poor-quality anticoagulation, stroke, clinically relevant bleeding, and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation
Chest.
Evaluation of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to predict the quality of anticoagulation control in a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism treated with vitamin K antagonists
Thromb. Res.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality
Thromb. Haemost.
Update on extended treatment for venous thromboembolism
Ann. Med.
Cited by (3)
Effect of current smoking on ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation taking vitamin K antagonist
2022, International Journal of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Risk and PreventionCitation Excerpt :Therefore, our findings should be interpreted in the context that most participants were men and attested in more representative population. Fourth, although the SAMe-TT2R2 score is a simple score based on clinical risk factors (sex, age, medical history, treatment [interacting drugs, e.g., amiodarone for rhythm control], tobacco and race), to distinguish patients according to low or high probability of poor INR control (TTR <65%) [23], we were unable to calculate SAMe-TT2R2 score in this study because details of treatments were lacking. Fifth, we did not incorporate the change in OACs during the follow-up.
SAMe-TT<inf>2</inf>R<inf>2</inf> Score to Predict Time in Therapeutic Range of Vitamin K Antagonists in Asian and Non-Asian patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
2024, American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
- 1
A full list of RIETE investigators is given in the appendix.