Original article
Molecular characterisation of Anaplasma species from African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in Kruger National Park, South Africa

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Bovine anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease, mainly caused by Anaplasma marginale and A. centrale and is distributed in tropical and sub-tropical areas. This study aimed to characterise A. marginale and A. centrale from African buffaloes in Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa, using the DNA sequences of the genes coding for major surface protein (msp1β) and heat shock protein (groEL), respectively. A total of 747 blood samples were collected from February 2014 to August 2016 from African buffaloes kept in KNP, and DNAs were tested using a molecular-phylogenetic approach. Out of 747 samples tested, 129 (17.3%) and 98 (13.1%) were positive for single infection with A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively; whereas 113 (15.1%) were positive for both Anaplasma spp. Pairwise difference of 1.6–8.5% was observed in msp1β sequences of A. marginale whereas that was only 0.3–2.4% for groEL sequences of A. centrale. Separate phylogenetic analyses of msp1β and groEL sequences of A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively, revealed that sequences of Anaplasma spp. from African buffaloes were unique and they grouped separately when compared with previously published sequences of both species. This is the first study to characterise A. marginale and A. centrale from African buffalo using species specific molecular markers. This study will pave the way for future studies to assess genetic variation among Anaplasma spp. from wild ruminants using molecular markers that are better at differentiating between species and strains than the more commonly used 16S rRNA gene, and help to undertake health and fitness studies and host-parasite dynamics using quantitative molecular tools.

Introduction

Anaplasmosis is an important tick-borne disease (TBDs) of domestic and wild animals in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, and is caused by obligate intracellular bacteria of the genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae). It is one of the four most detrimental tick-borne diseases (TBDs) of bovines in sub-Saharan Africa (others: babesiosis, cowdriosis and theileriosis) (Debeila, 2012), and is estimated to be responsible for 3% of all cattle mortalities in South Africa (Aubry and Geale, 2011, Brown, 2012, De Waal, 2000, Eygelaar et al., 2015). In South Africa, anaplasmosis is mainly transmitted by Amblyomma spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. (Gallivan et al., 2011, Horak et al., 2007, Horak et al., 2011). Bovine anaplasmosis is mainly caused by Anaplasma marginale and, to a lesser extent, by A. centrale. The disease is usually transmitted by ticks, but it can also be transmitted transplacentally, or mechanically by biting flies or blood-contaminated fomites (Aubry and Geale, 2011, Potgieter and Stoltz, 2004). Major clinical signs in infected cattle include pyrexia, progressive anaemia, jaundice, anorexia, depression, reduced milk production, abortion in pregnant animals, and death, particularly in exotic breeds (Aubry and Geale, 2011, Debeila, 2012, Kocan et al., 2010, Potgieter and Stoltz, 2004).

While anaplasmosis is well documented in cattle, very little is known about the disease and its impact in wild bovids such as the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). Tick-borne infections are common in buffalo, which serve as a reservoir for bovine theileriosis (Theileria parva) (Debeila, 2012, Henrichs et al., 2016). Buffalo appear to be only mildly affected by Anaplasma infections (Berggoetz et al., 2014, Debeila, 2012, Kuttler, 1984), which raises the question whether they might also function as reservoirs for this group of parasites. To date, A. marginale, A. centrale, A. sp. Omatjenne, A. bovis and A. phagocytophilum have been detected from African buffaloes using the 16S rRNA gene, though A. phagocytophilum has only been found once in one animal (Fyumagwa et al., 2013, Henrichs et al., 2016). African buffalo are a useful wildlife species in which to study Anaplasma species dynamics as they are known to be wildlife reservoirs for numerous diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease, bovine tuberculosis and theileriosis, yet their role in maintaining Anaplasma species is unknown (Debeila, 2012). Identification of wildlife reservoirs is essential to controlling infection in livestock which may have a direct or indirect contact with the reservoir population (Haydon et al., 2002).

Various methods have been used to diagnose anaplasmosis, including microscopy, serology (complement fixation, rapid card agglutination, indirect immunofluorescent antibody tests, capillary tube agglutination tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, latex agglutination and radioimmunassays) and molecular methods (Aubry and Geale, 2011, Potgieter and Stoltz, 2004). For molecular methods utilising polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a number of markers such as the 16S rRNA, major surface protein (msp1α, msp1β, msp2, msp3, msp4 and msp5), citrate synthase gltA and the heat shock protein groEL genes have been used for the detection of Anaplasma spp. (Carelli et al., 2007, Ceci et al., 2008, de la Fuente et al., 2001, Lew et al., 2002, Lew et al., 2003, Molad et al., 2006); whereas, msp1α, msp1β, msp4 and groEL have been used for finer scale differentiation of various Anaplasma species and strains.

Very little is known about the diversity of Anaplasma spp. from African buffaloes and only one marker, the 16S rRNA gene, has been used so far to characterise them (Debeila, 2012, Henrichs et al., 2016). However, the most commonly used markers for characterisation of these species, such as genes for major surface proteins and heat shock protein groEL, allow for better resolution which might reveal significant genetic differences among Anaplasma spp. found in domestic and wild ruminants, and can be used in quantitative molecular methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterise the two important species of Anaplasma (A. marginale and A. centrale) from African buffaloes in South Africa using DNA sequences from the genes coding for a major surface protein and heat shock protein groEL, respectively. This study will allow future research into buffalo as a reservoir host of Anaplasma spp.

Section snippets

Study site, animal characteristics and blood collection

Blood samples were collected as a part of a longitudinal disease study of African buffaloes in Kruger National Park (KNP), an area 360 km long (north-south) and 90 km wide (east-west) in the north-east corner of the Republic of South Africa (Fig. 1). Kruger National Park is in a summer-rainfall area with an average temperature of 22 °C (18–26 °C) and average annual rainfall ranging from 458 to 746 mm (SA Weather Bureau; Zambatis, 2003). From February 2014 until August 2016, approximately 60

Results

PCR amplicons were of expected size (msp1β, 700/246; groEL, 1250) when examined using agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR-sequencing analysis revealed the presence of single or mixed infections of Anaplasma spp. in African buffaloes. Out of 747 samples tested, 129 (17.3%) and 98 (13.1%) were positive for single infection with A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively; whereas 113 (15.1%) were positive for both Anaplasma spp. Of the 103 individuals sampled at least once throughout the sampling

Discussion

This is the first study to characterise A. marginale and A. centrale from African buffalo using species specific molecular markers, msp1β and groEL, respectively. Molecular-phylogenetic analyses of msp1β and groEL sequences of A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively, revealed that sequences of Anaplasma spp. from African buffaloes were unique and they grouped separately when compared with previously published sequences of both species.

In the present study, we found that the overall sample

Acknowledgements

We thank South African National Parks (SANParks) for permission to conduct this study in Kruger National Park and M. Hofmeyr, P. Buss and the entire SANParks Veterinary Wildlife Services Department for invaluable assistance with animal captures and project logistics, as well as Kruger National Park DAFF veterinarians, especially Lin Mari De-Klerk Lorist and Louis van Schalkwyk. Thank you also to our collaborators from the Pirbright Institute, including E. Perez, B. Charleston and F. Zhang. We

References (36)

  • L. Ceci et al.

    First report of bovine anaplasmosis by Anaplasma centrale in Europe, molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis

    Vet. Res. Commun.

    (2008)
  • D. Darriba et al.

    jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing

    Nat. Methods

    (2012)
  • D.T. De Waal

    Anaplasmosis Control and Diagnosis in South Africa

    Annu. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2000)
  • E.M. Debeila

    Occurrence of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in Kruger National Park and Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park in South Africa. MPhil Thesis

    (2012)
  • N. Decaro et al.

    Duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous detection and quantification of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale

    J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.

    (2008)
  • R.C. Edgar

    MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2004)
  • D. Eygelaar et al.

    Tick-borne haemoparasites in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) from two wildlife areas in Northern Botswana

    Parasit. Vectors

    (2015)
  • R.D. Fyumagwa et al.

    African buffalo is an important reservior of Anaplasma bovis in the Ngorongoro Crater, Tanzania

    Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Cattle ticks and associated tick-borne pathogens in Burkina Faso and Benin: Apparent northern spread of Rhipicephalus microplus in Benin and first evidence of Theileria velifera and Theileria annulata

      2021, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      The detection of A. marginale was expected in this survey as this pathogen is known to be endemic worldwide especially in tropical and subtropical areas (Kocan and de la Fuente, 2003). It has been found only in examined cattle (and not in ticks) without significant difference in prevalence between the eastern BF and northern BN although its vector ticks, A. variegatum and Rhipicephalus spp. (Harrison et al., 2011 ; Sisson et al., 2017), are widespread and has a similar distribution in the two areas. Some pools of A. variegatum were found positive to Ehrlichia ruminantium.

    • Screening of tick-borne pathogens in argasid ticks in Zambia: Expansion of the geographic distribution of Rickettsia lusitaniae and Rickettsia hoogstraalii and detection of putative novel Anaplasma species

      2021, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many of the epidemiological studies on Anaplasmataceae were carried out on vertebrate hosts and ixodid ticks in many regions including Africa. For example, Anaplasma marginale was detected from cattle and buffalo in Southern Africa, Tunisia, Senegal, Madagascar, Morocco, and Kenya (Ait Hamou et al., 2012; Adjou Moumouni et al., 2015; Belkahia et al., 2015; Eygelaar et al., 2015; Pothmann et al., 2016; Sisson et al., 2017; Dahmani et al., 2019); Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis were detected from dogs in Zambia (Qiu et al., 2018; Vlahakis et al., 2018); and Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia spp. were detected from ixodid ticks in Ghana and South Africa (Mtshali et al., 2017; Adenyo et al., 2020). However, few studies have explored the presence of Anaplasmataceae associated with argasid ticks in African continent.

    • Status of Anaplasma spp. infection in domestic ruminants from Iran: A systematic review with meta-analysis

      2020, Parasite Epidemiology and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a similar study, in Pakistan, the southeast Iranian neighbor, 1050 blood samples from livestock farms were microscopically examined and revealed that 21.14% of samples were positive for blood parasites that Anaplasma with the prevalence of 5.81%, was the most prevalent hemoparasite (Atif et al., 2012). Different countries from Africa, including Uganda, Kenya, Morocco, Ghana and Tanzania reported bovine anaplasmosis outbreaks during 2003 to 2019 (Bah, 2016; Sisson et al., 2017; Byaruhanga et al., 2018. Ringo et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text