Use of organic wastes to create lightweight green roof substrates with increased plant-available water
Introduction
Green roofs are becoming increasingly popular because they provide many economic and environmental benefits for cities. These benefits include rainfall retention and improved stormwater water quality (Berndtsson, 2010), reduced urban heat island effect (Li et al., 2014), reduced energy use (Sailor, 2008), habitat provision for plants and animals (Brenneisen, 2006) and improved air quality (Yang et al., 2008). Rainfall retention and reduced stormwater runoff is the focus of many green roof policies and incentive schemes worldwide (Carter and Fowler, 2008). However, rainfall retention by green roofs can vary from as little as 27% to as much as 81% (Mentens et al., 2006), and in addition to rainfall frequency and intensity, is influenced by substrate depth and water retention (Berndtsson, 2010; Villarreal and Bengtsson, 2005).
Green roof substrates are often shallow (<20 cm deep on extensive green roofs) and are designed to provide water and nutrients for plants whilst being well drained, lightweight, and stable over time (Farrell et al., 2012; Rowe et al., 2006). Variations in purpose and design as well as climatic differences means that there is not a universal substrate that meets the design criteria for all green roofs. Additionally, the type of organic matter added to green roof substrates varies according to cost, availability, suitability and preference (Ampim et al., 2010). Substrates usually contain 80–90% v/v lightweight inorganic components such as; crushed brick, pumice, heat-expanded shale and scoria, which provide stable structure and provide pore space for drainage and oxygen supply to roots (Dvorak and Volder, 2010). Organic components usually make up the remaining 10–20 % v/v, which improves water retention for stormwater management and plant survival, reduces substrate weight (bulk density), improves cation exchange capacity and provides nutrients for vegetation (Fassman and Simcock, 2011). However, while the presence of organic matter is critical for plant growth and survival (Emilsson and Rolf, 2005), careful consideration of the organic matter type and rate of addition is essential when formulating substrates.
Organic components which have been evaluated for use in green roof substrates include: peat (Emilsson and Rolf, 2005), coconut coir (Farrell et al., 2012; Vijayaraghavan and Raja, 2014), composted green waste (Eksi et al., 2015; Graceson et al., 2014b), composted pine bark (Fassman and Simcock, 2011), mushroom compost (Griffin et al., 2017), olive mill residue and grape marc compost (Ntoulas et al., 2015). However, while many of these organic components are effective at sustaining vegetation and increasing water retention, these materials may not always be locally available. It is important to develop and evaluate substrates locally as this reduces transportation embedded energy and financial costs (Ampim et al., 2010). The use of local waste materials is preferred as this turns low value (or no value) materials into a valued resource, which obviously reduces costs and can help encourage green roof implementation (Emilsson and Rolf, 2005; Molineux et al., 2009; Vijayaraghavan, 2016). There are many waste materials that have been successfully used to improve the environmental sustainability of containerized and soil-less horticultural mixes (Barrett et al., 2016), but have not yet been evaluated for green roofs substrates. These organic waste materials include; rice hulls (Papafotiou et al., 2001), pistachio shells (Karimi et al., 2013) and almond shells and hulls (Urrestarazu et al., 2005; Valverde et al., 2013). However, there is also potential for these waste materials to have adverse effects on plant growth through high salinity or the presence of phytotoxic compounds (Çimen et al., 2007; Karimi et al., 2013; Ortega et al., 1996). Therefore, research is needed to evaluate substrate physical and chemical properties with different types of organic components (Ampim et al., 2010; Nagase and Dunnett, 2011).
The proportion of organic matter also influences green roof substrate performance. High rates of organic matter (>20%) are considered problematic on green roofs as rapid decomposition can lead to compaction, which reduces substrate depth, air supply for roots and water infiltration and retention (Handreck and Black, 2010) and can temporarily increase nutrient loads in stormwater runoff (Berndtsson, 2010). Rapid decomposition is especially problematic for organic matter high in cellulose, as opposed to woody material high in lignin, which resists degradation (Handreck and Black, 2010). German green roof standards, often adopted internationally, specify that organic matter in green roof substrates should not exceed 20% v/v (FLL, 2008). Some authors have shown rates as little as 10% v/v organic matter addition to be optimal for plant growth and water retention (Nagase and Dunnett, 2011). However, there is also a high risk of total decomposition if the application rate is too low, as demonstrated by Emilsson and Rolf (2005), who showed almost complete decomposition of organic matter (peat added at 10% w/w) after one year on a green roof in southern Sweden. The optimal rate of addition is likely to vary with the type of organic component, its cellulose:lignin ratio (Handreck and Black, 2010), as well as its interaction with inorganic components in substrate mixes and climate (Ampim et al., 2010; Graceson et al., 2014a; Nagase and Dunnett, 2011).
The desired ecosystem service of the green roof will also be important when selecting the appropriate rate and type of organic components for the substrate (Young et al., 2014). In hot and dry climates, like Mediterranean Europe and parts of southern Australia, it is important for green roof substrates to not only have good water holding capacity for stormwater retention, but also for much of this water to be plant-available (Cao et al., 2014). While there has been some research on the effects of different organic components and rates of application on green roof substrate water retention, the effects of organic components on plant water availability has attracted less consideration (for exceptions, see Fassman and Simcock, 2011; Ntoulas et al., 2015; Papafotiou et al., 2013). In regions where green roofs are not yet common, it is also important to evaluate the effects of different rates and types of organic matter in improving substrate properties when mixed with locally available mineral components, as the interactive effects are not predictable from the physical properties of individual components (Graceson et al., 2014a).
The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of five different types of locally available organic components and rates of addition on substrate performance. Our primary aim was to create a lightweight substrate with good aeration and increased plant-available water (PAW) for green roofs in hot and dry climates. Secondly, we aimed to determine whether the different types of organic matter were also chemically suitable for plant growth.
Section snippets
Substrate components and mixes
We evaluated the effects of adding five different types of organic waste (fine coir, coarse coir, composted green waste, pistachio shells, almond hulls) to a scoria-based substrate at five rates of addition (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% v/v) on substrate physical and chemical properties.
All of the substrates evaluated contained 20% scoria aggregate (7 mm diameter; Aerolite Quarries, Victoria, Australia) and between 60% and 80% scoria (<8 mm diameter, including fines; Aerolite Quarries, Victoria,
Effects of organic waste type and rate of addition on substrate properties
The addition of coarse coir, fine coir, composted green waste and almond hull significantly increased substrate WHC, relative to no organic matter (Table 3). In contrast, pistachio shell did not increase WHC (P < 0.68). The optimal rate of addition for increasing WHC was 10–15 % for composted green waste and 20 % for coarse coir, fine coir and almond hull. Composted green waste had the highest WHC at 15% rate of addition, while pistachio shell had the lowest values. At 20% rate of addition, all
Discussion
Substrate physical properties varied greatly depending on the type of organic waste component and rate of addition, which will affect installation and design possibilities. In hot and dry climates, it is important for green roofs substrates to not only have good water holding capacity (WHC) for stormwater retention, but that as much of this water content is also available for plant growth i.e. PAW (Farrell et al., 2013). With this goal in mind, coarse coir, fine coir and composted green waste
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
We thank Audrey Michenaud-Rague for her assistance with the growth experiment and Nick Osborne for technical assistance. This research was funded by Australian Research Council Linkage Grant LP130100731, supported by Melbourne Water and the Inner Melbourne Action Plan. Chris Szota and Stephen Livesley provided valuable feedback during the preparation of this manuscript.
References (50)
- et al.
Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems–A review
Sci. Hortic.
(2016) - et al.
Effects of varying organic matter content on the development of green roof vegetation: a six year experiment
Ecol. Eng.
(2015) - et al.
Biochar makes green roof substrates lighter and improves water supply to plants
Ecol. Eng.
(2014) - et al.
Utilization of almond residues
Int J Agr Biol Eng
(2010) - et al.
Green roof vegetation for North American ecoregions: a literature review
Landsc. Urban Plann.
(2010) - et al.
Effect of substrate compost percentage on green roof vegetable production
Urban For. Urban Green.
(2015) - et al.
Comparison of establishment methods for extensive green roofs in southern Sweden
Urban For. Urban Green.
(2005) - et al.
Water-retention additives increase plant available water in green roof substrates
Ecol. Eng.
(2013) - et al.
Green roofs for hot and dry climates: interacting effects of plant water use, succulence and substrate
Ecol. Eng.
(2012) - et al.
Use of inorganic substrates and composted green waste in growing media for green roofs
Biosyst. Eng.
(2014)
Plant growth responses to different growing media for green roofs
Ecol. Eng.
Filter-paper method for routine measurement of field water potential
J. Hydrol.
Comparisons of extensive green roof media in Southern Ontario
Ecol. Eng.
Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century?
Landsc. Urban Plann.
Characterising alternative recycled waste materials for use as green roof growing media in the U.K
Ecol. Eng.
The relationship between percentage of organic matter in substrate and plant growth in extensive green roofs
Landsc. Urban Plann.
Behaviour of different horticultural species in phytotoxicity bioassays of bark substrates
Sci. Hortic.
Plant establishment on a green roof under extreme hot and dry conditions: the importance of leaf succulence in plant selection
Urban For. Urban Green.
A green roof model for building energy simulation programs
Energy Build.
Almond shell waste: possible local rockwool substitute in soilless crop culture
Sci. Hortic.
Green roofs: a critical review on the role of components, benefits, limitations and trends
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
Design and development of green roof substrate to improve runoff water quality: plant growth experiments and adsorption
Water Res.
Response of a sedum green-roof to individual rain events
Ecol. Eng.
Quantifying air pollution removal by green roofs in Chicago
Atmos. Environ.
Importance of different components of green roof substrate on plant growth and physiological performance
Urban For. Urban Green.
Cited by (22)
Biochar and vegetation effects on discharge water quality from organic-substrate green roofs
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentNutrient treatment of greywater in green wall systems: A critical review of removal mechanisms, performance efficiencies and system design parameters
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementPhysical and chemical parameters of various waste materials for living roof systems: A critical review
2023, Ecological EngineeringSubstrate modified with biochar improves the hydrothermal properties of green roofs
2023, Environmental ResearchCitation Excerpt :Adding water-retaining fillers is another effective way to improve the physical and chemical properties of the substrates without damaging substrate drainage. It was found that these fillers do benefit to the rainstorm runoff mitigation and inhibit the temperature rise of the indoor via evaporative cooling as well as thermal insulation of substrates (Xue and Farrell, 2020). Biochar (BC) is a kind of porous carbonaceous material obtained by pyrolyzing biomass at low temperature without oxygen or oxygen limitation (Wang et al., 2020b; Tan et al., 2021).
Effect of highly efficient substrate modifier, super-absorbent polymer, on the performance of the green roof
2022, Science of the Total Environment
- 1
Current address: Yangling Vocational & Technical College, 10 Xinong Street,Yangling, Shaanxi Province, China.