Degradation of orange-G by advanced oxidation processes
Introduction
Textile dyes constitute one of the largest groups of organic compounds that represent an increasing environmental concern with reference to water pollution. Of the dyes available in the market, approximately 50–70% is azo dyes followed by the anthraquinone dyes. Azo dyes can be divided into monoazo, diazo and triazo classes depending on the presence of one or more azo groups (–NN–).
Azo dyes belong to the largest class of dyes used in textile and paper industries. They are very stable to ultraviolet and visible light irradiation. Moreover, they are resistant to aerobic degradation [1] and can be reduced to potentially carcinogenic aromatic amines under anaerobic conditions or in vivo [2], [3]. About 1–20% of the total synthetic dyes in the world is lost during the dyeing process and is released in the textile effluents [4], [5]. The release of this contaminated water into the environment is a considerable source of non-aesthetic pollution and eutrophication which can produce dangerous by-products through oxidation, hydrolysis, or other chemical reactions taking place in the wastewater itself [6], [7]. The various methods through which the degradation and mineralization of such dye effluents can be achieved have therefore received increasing attention. Chlorination and ozonation have been used for the removal of certain dyes but they work at slow rates, as well as have high operating costs [8], [9]. Therefore, in order to overcome the drawbacks of some of the conventional treatment methods, advanced oxidation processes have been proposed by many scientists and engineers. Different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) include, electrochemical oxidation processes, sonolysis, supercritical water oxidation and homogeneous and heterogeneous photochemical processes [10], [11], [12]. Particularly, sonochemical degradation of certain organic pollutants and azo dyes were widely studied by Hoffmann and coworkers [13], [14], [15]. Sonochemical degradation often fails to achieve the complete mineralization. A few studies have focused on combined AOPs [16], [17], [18]. Ragaini et al. [16] observed a synergetic enhancement in the degradation rate for the sonophotocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol using a 20 kHz ultrasound. Peller et al. [17] carried out combined high frequency (660 kHz) sonolysis/photocatalysis and achieved synergistic degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol without making any toxic intermediates even at very low catalyst loadings. Selli [18] reported a synergy in combining sonolysis and photocatalysis for the degradation of an azo dye, acid orange 8.
Recently, Collings et al. [19] studied the rapid degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s) and certain organochloride pesticides present in the soil using ultrasound (20 kHz, 160 W). It was reported that 1 min of sonication was sufficient to achieve 90% destruction of the PCB’s and 99% destruction was attained after 7 min. Such a rapid decomposition of the pollutants was believed to be due to the solid particles in slurry acting as foci for the nucleation and collapse of micro bubbles. These quite remarkable observations have prompted us to study the effect of solid particles on the sonolytic degradation of a textile dye, orange-G (OG).
The photocatalytic degradation of OG has been reported in several studies [20], [21]. Nagaveni et al. [22] reported the degradation of OG using combustion-synthesized nano-TiO2 under solar light, and found that the initial degradation rates were 1.6 times higher than that using Degussa P25 TiO2. Sun et al. [23] studied the degradation of OG on nitrogen doped TiO2 and reported that the doped TiO2 nanocatalysts demonstrated higher activity than the commercial Degussa P25 under visible light.
In the present study, sonolysis, heterogeneous photocatalysis and a combination of both (sonophotocatalysis) have been chosen for the degradation of OG, with the aim of investigating effect of solid particles in a multi-AOP to find the best possible conditions for the degradation of the dye.
Section snippets
Experimental conditions
Sonolysis experiments were performed at an ultrasound frequency of 213 kHz in a continuous wave mode. The ultrasound unit used was ELAC LVG-60 RF generator coupled with ELAC Allied signal transducer with a plate diameter of 54.5 mm [12]. The power output on the RF generator for all experiments was 35% which corresponds to a calorimetric power of about 20 W. All reagents used were of AR grade and were used without further purification. Aqueous solutions of OG (Sigma–Aldrich) were prepared using
Results and discussion
The degradation of OG was performed under different experimental conditions that include, (i) photoirradiation alone (UV-“control”), (ii) ultrasound alone (US), (iii) photoirradiation in the presence of TiO2 (UV + TiO2) and (iv) a combination of photocatalysis and ultrasound (US + UV + TiO2) and the results are shown in Fig. 1. The preliminary experiments revealed no significant degradation of OG occurred either in the absence of US or UV. However, under the presence of US with 35% amplitude at the
Conclusions
The conclusions drawn from this study can be summarized as follows:
- (1)
Degradation of OG depends on the initial dye concentration and pH of the reaction mixture. Sonolytic degradation is favoured at acidic pH and the reverse is true for the photocatalyic degradation. The surface active nature of OG at acidic pH can account for the higher degradation efficiency in acidic pH during sonication. In the case of photocatalysis, the higher concentration of OH− ions at pH 12 produces more hydroxyl radicals
Acknowledgements
The authors thank DIISR, Australia and DST, New Delhi for the financial support of an India–Australian strategic research fund (INT/AUS/P-1/07 dated 19 September 2007).
References (34)
- et al.
Chemosphere
(1986) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. A
(1997) - et al.
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
(2001) - et al.
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
(1994) - et al.
Ultrason. Sonochem.
(2009) - et al.
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
(2007) Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
(1998)- et al.
Ultrason. Sonochem.
(2001) - et al.
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
(2004) - et al.
J. Hazard. Mater.
(2008)
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Cited by (128)
The use of power ultrasound for water treatment
2023, Power Ultrasonics: Applications of High-Intensity Ultrasound, Second EditionA dye-methylene blue (MB)-degraded by hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) and combined with other oxidants
2022, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringEfficient sonophotocatalytic degradation of acid blue 113 dye using a hybrid nanocomposite of CoFe<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf> nanoparticles loaded on multi-walled carbon nanotubes
2022, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry