The mechanism of sonochemical degradation of a cationic surfactant in aqueous solution

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.09.013Get rights and content

Abstract

The sonochemical degradation of the cationic surfactant, laurylpyridinium chloride (LPC), in water was studied at concentrations of 0.1–0.6 mM, all below its critical micelle concentration (15 mM). It has been found that the initial step in the degradation of LPC occurs primarily by a pyrolysis pathway. Chemical analysis of sonicated solutions by gas chromatography, electrospray mass spectrometry, and high performance liquid chromatography reveals that a broad range of decomposition products, hydrocarbon gases and water-soluble species, are produced. Propionamide and acetamide were identified as two of the degradation intermediates and probably formed as the result of the opening of the pyridinium ring following OH radical addition. Most of the LPC is eventually converted into carboxylic acids. The complete mineralization of these carboxylic acids by sonolysis is however a comparatively slow process due to the hydrophilic nature of these low molecular weight products.

Research highlights

►Cationic surfactants pollute aqueous environments due to their domestic and industrial use. ►The degradation of a cationic surfactant by means of an effective AOP, sonolysis, has been studied. ►The decomposition of the cationic surfactant occurs primarily by pyrolytic decomposition. ►The mineralization is a slow process due to the hydrophilic nature of the intermediates.

Introduction

Cationic surfactants [1] are widely used in industries and household chemicals, some examples include textile softeners, pharmaceuticals, emulsions, disinfectants and human hair cosmetics. Upon release into the environment, cationic surfactants pollute the environment because their positive charge results in a strong affinity for the surface of particulates in sewage sludge, soil and sediments that are predominantly negatively charged. Hermann et al. [2] investigated the reaction of humic substances (end products of decayed organic matter) from different sources with a cationic surfactant laurylpyridinium chloride (LPC) and found strong interactions between humic substances and LPC. Once bound to the surface of humic substances, LPC could be desorbed only in small amounts even with strong extractants. These reactions affect the overall biodegradation process because bound surfactants are mineralized slowly compared to the free molecules.

Although cationic surfactants are not as widely used as anionic and non-ionic surfactants they are known to be 10 times to 100 times more toxic than anionic and non-ionic surfactants even at very low concentrations. With regard to human oral toxicity, cationic surfactants are found to be of somewhat higher in toxicity than that of anionic and non-ionic surfactants. In case of human eye irritation, cationic surfactants are the most irritating of all the surfactants [3].

Janicke and Hilge [4] have reported that quaternary ammonium salts exhibit little or no degradation under anaerobic conditions. Ginkel [5] has reported that cationic surfactants can be degraded aerobically. Though readily biodegradable in aerobic environments, even at low concentrations cationic surfactants are found to potentially disturb the ecological balance by harming aquatic organisms and soil biota [6]. Battersby and Wilson [7] observed that concentrations of 200 mg L−1 hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide inhibit the production of methane, suggesting that such concentrations are inhibitory to resident microbes.

At present there is not a great deal of data on the degradation of cationic surfactants and their fate in the environment. The reason for this is the lack of sensitive and accurate methods for the determination of cationic surfactants in environmental water and sediments. Cationic surfactants easily form stable ion-pair complexes with the ubiquitous anionic groups on natural constituents found in environmental water, rendering conventional analytical methods inapplicable [8].

The purpose of this study was to investigate the degradation of a cationic surfactant, LPC, by means of an effective advanced oxidation method, i.e., sonolysis. To our knowledge, the only previous study examining the degradation of LPC in aqueous solution was by heterogeneous photocatalysis, and the principal interest was on the formation of ammonium and nitrate ions [9].

Sonochemistry, as an advanced oxidation process, has received considerable interest over the past few decades [10]. Localised “hot-spots”, produced from inertially collapsing bubbles in water exposed to ultrasound reach temperatures of about 4500 K [11], [12]. These extreme conditions generated within the cavitation bubbles results in the dissociation of water vapour molecules into H and OH radicals (see Reaction 1). The concentration of OH radicals at the bubble/solution interface has been estimated to be as high as 1 × 10−2 M upon bubble collapse [13].H2O)))))H+OHO2)))))2ON2)))))2NH+O2HO2O+H2O2HOHO+OHH2O2

From the reaction of O, H and OH radicals with each other and with H2O and O2 during the rapid cooling phase, HO2 radicals and H2O2 molecules are formed (see (Reaction1), (Reaction2), (Reaction3), (Reaction4), (Reaction5), (Reaction 6)). In this molecular environment organic compounds are decomposed and inorganic compounds are oxidized or reduced [14]. The decomposition of N2 in the presence of oxygen usually leads to the formation of nitrous and nitric acid [15].

In addition to this oxidative degradation pathway, pyrolysis of solutes may also occur within cavitating bubbles. Volatile solutes adsorbed at the bubble/solution interface can evaporate into the core of the bubble during bubble growth. Under the high-temperature conditions of a sonochemically active bubble, entrained solutes decompose and solute decomposition products may accumulate over many bubble oscillation cycles [11], [16].

Section snippets

Materials

Laurylpyridinium chloride (LPC) was purchased from TCI and was used as received. Water was obtained from a three-stage Milli-Q water purification system with conductivity of <10−6 S cm−1 and surface tension of 72.0 mN m−1 at 25 °C.

Sonolysis and reaction conditions

The ultrasound unit used was an ELAC LVG-60 RF generator coupled with an ELAC Allied signal transducer with a plate diameter of 54.5 mm. Sonolysis experiments were performed at an ultrasound frequency of 355 kHz in continuous wave mode. The power output on the RF generator

Results

The sonolytic degradation of LPC was carried out in the initial concentration range of 0.1–0.6 mM (see Fig. 1). The critical micelle concentration for LPC is 15 mM [18] and therefore in the present study the results are not influenced by micelle formation. Fig. 1 shows the relative changes in the concentration of LPC as a function of sonication time. It can be seen that the relative change in LPC concentration decreases as the initial concentration of LPC increases. The initial rate of

Discussion

It is known that surfactant molecules accumulate at the bubble/solution interface prior to bubble collapse [20], [21], [22]. In previous studies on the sonochemical degradation of surfactants it has been found that both thermal decomposition and radical attack on these interfacially located molecules are the underlying processes responsible for their decomposition [21], [23], [24], [25]. The initial rate of degradation of LPC, unlike other surfactant molecules studied to date, decreases with an

Conclusions

Based on the degradation rate of LPC, ESMS analysis and hydrocarbon gaseous products detection, we conclude that the initial pathway for the decomposition of the cationic surfactant LPC occurs primarily by pyrolytic decomposition of the surfactant molecules adsorbed at the surface of cavitating bubbles. It is also established that further complex processes involving oxidation of intermediates leads to low molecular weight water soluble species that are difficult to mineralize, indicating that

Acknowledgements

RS acknowledges support from the David Hay Memorial Fund. The Particulate Fluids Processing Centre, a Special Research Centre of the Australian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.

References (30)

  • Supeno et al.

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2000)
  • J. Berlan et al.

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (1994)
  • J. Madhavan et al.

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2010)
  • J. Madhavan et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2010)
  • R. Hermann et al.

    Water, Air, Soil Pollut.

    (1997)
  • Electronic Source,...
  • W. Janicke et al.

    Tenside Surfactant Deterg.

    (1979)
  • R.M.E. Richards et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1993)
  • N.S. Battersby et al.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1989)
  • M.J. Scott et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2000)
  • H. Hidaka et al.

    New J. Chem.

    (1994)
  • T.J. Mason

    Current Trends in Sonochemistry

    (1992)
  • K. Vinodgopal et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (27)

    • The use of power ultrasound for water treatment

      2023, Power Ultrasonics: Applications of High-Intensity Ultrasound, Second Edition
    • An overview on surfactants as pollutants of concern: Occurrence, impacts and persulfate-based remediation technologies

      2022, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      Results showed that NP9EO and imazapyr were more toxic to mice, Allium cepa, Drosophila melanogaster and Biomphalaria tenagophila. Cationic surfactants are molecules with positive charge, with high tendency to adsorb to other phases that are negatively charged, such as sewage sludge particles, soil and sediments (Singla et al., 2011). Once the cationic surfactants are bounded to these substances or surfaces, lower rates of biodegradation may be observed when compared to the biodegradation of unbound molecules (Hermann et al., 1997).

    • Photochemical transformation of pyridinium ionic liquids in aqueous phase: Kinetics, products and mechanism

      2021, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      At present, although toxicity of the ILs is controversial, however, it is necessary to have risk evaluation of using ILs before large-scale application of ILs, particularly the possible indelible impact on the natural waters because most of the ILs are hydrophilic. For this reason, works have been carried out on degradation and treatment of Pyr+ ILs, including adsorption removal [1,24–27], Fenton and Fenton-like oxidation [28,29], electric Fenton and photoelectric Fenton oxidation [30,31], ultrasonic chemical degradation [32], electrochemical oxidation [33], photochemical degradation and photocatalytic degradation [34–36], and even microbial treatment [19,37–39]. These studies have focused on the control of reaction process and optimization of reaction conditions, however, not much on the degradation kinetics of Pyr+ ILs and analysis of products and reaction mechanism.

    • Sonochemical degradation of surfactants with different charge types: Effect of the critical micelle concentration in the interfacial region of the cavity

      2021, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The interfacial region of the cavity has attracted attention since the early stages of sonochemistry [8]. Therefore, many studies have investigated this target by sonolysis of surfactants [9–24]. We previously investigated the physicochemical properties of the interfacial region of cavities by sonochemical degradation of anionic surfactants [25,26].

    • Surfactants: an emerging face of pollution

      2020, Micropollutants and Challenges: Emerging in the Aquatic Environments and Treatment Processes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text