Phase I and II randomised trials of the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype adjuvanted inactivated split-virus influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in healthy adults
Introduction
Pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses are leading candidates for the next influenza pandemic. These viruses have spread to an unprecedented number of countries causing severe disease in poultry and associated zoonotic infections in humans with a high fatality rate [1]. Although H5N1 viruses have not yet demonstrated sustained person-to-person transmission, there is a concerted global effort to develop prototype pandemic vaccines based on currently circulating H5N1 strains.
To provide a rapid response to an emergent H5 pandemic and to facilitate the speed of clinical development and regulatory approval, it is desirable that prototype pandemic vaccine development be based closely on current licensed manufacturing processes for influenza vaccines [2] and on the use of adjuvants with an extensive safety record. Several prototype vaccines based on clade 1 H5N1 virus strains (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 and A/Vietnam/1203/2004) have been evaluated in adults [3], [4], [5], [6]. Findings from these studies confirm that at least two doses of vaccine are required to elicit an immune response in naïve populations.
Given the diversity of circulating H5 strains and the rapid evolution of influenza A viruses, prototype pandemic vaccines that confer protection against a number of circulating H5N1 viruses will maximise the protection achieved in a vaccinated population. Although existing prototype vaccines are based on the clade 1 strains [3], [4], [5], [6] genetically distinct clade 2 strains are responsible for the most recent human avian influenza infections [7]. The objective of this study was to evaluate prototype inactivated split-virus A/Vietnam/1194/2004 vaccine formulations in healthy adult populations. In addition, the ability of a 6-month booster vaccine to enhance immunogenicity and the cross-reactivity of immune responses to two diverse clade 2 H5N1 viruses was assessed.
Section snippets
Study design
We report results from two prospective, observational, multicentre trials that were conducted within Australia to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of: (i) 7.5 and 15 μg H5 haemagglutinin (HA) with or without AlPO4 adjuvant (phase I trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00136331); and (ii) 30 μg or 45 μg H5 HA with AlPO4 adjuvant (phase II trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00320346). The phase I trial was conducted from October 2005 to July 2006 at: (i) the Murdoch
Participant distribution and demographic data
A total of 400 participants were enrolled in each trial and randomised to each group within each trial (Fig. 1, Table 1). All enrolled participants were included in the safety populations. Over 98% (787/800) of participants completed the primary vaccination course, including the Day 42 follow-up visit. Of the 13 participants (from both trials) who did not complete the primary vaccination course, only one withdrew because of an AE (mild muscle ache and fatigue). Of the 271 participants who
Discussion
This study helps define the potential dosage regimen for a prototype H5N1 pandemic vaccine in healthy adult populations and provides new data demonstrating that inactivated, split-virus, clade 1, H5N1 vaccines, with or without adjuvant, elicit modest levels of cross-reactive MN antibodies to currently circulating variant H5N1 strains.
Immune responses in the phase I trial with the 7.5 and 15 μg HA formulations (with or without adjuvant) were comparable to those previously observed with similar
Acknowledgments
The data reported here were presented, in part, at the VIII International Symposium on Respiratory Viral Infections, Hawaii, March 16–19, 2006; the 3rd WHO Meeting on Evaluation of Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in Clinical Trials, WHO/HQ, Geneva, February 15–16, 2007 and the Options for the Control of Influenza VI Conference, Toronto Canada, June 17–23, 2007.
The authors would like to extend their thanks to the participants, investigators and personnel at each study site. Specifically, the authors
References (17)
- et al.
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated split-virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine: phase I randomised trial
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated adjuvanted whole-virion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine: a phase I randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Antigen sparing and cross-reactive immunity with an adjuvanted rH5N1 prototype pandemic influenza vaccine: a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2007) - et al.
Generation of influenza vaccine viruses on Vero cells by reverse genetics: an H5N1 candidate vaccine strain produced under a quality system
Vaccine
(2005) - et al.
Detection of anti-H5 responses in human sera by HI using horse erythrocytes following MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 vaccine
Virus Res
(2004) - et al.
Safety and antigenicity of non-adjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccine: a randomised trial of two potential vaccines against H5N1 influenza
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hemagglutinin vaccine for H5 influenza in humans
Vaccine
(2001) - World Health Organisation. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A (H5N1) reported to WHO;...
Cited by (77)
Cationic polymer-modified Alhagi honey polysaccharide PLGA nanoparticles as an adjuvant to induce strong and long-lasting immune responses
2021, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesImproving adjuvanticity of quaternized chitosan–based microgels for H5N1 split vaccine by tailoring the particle properties to achieve antigen dose sparing effect
2016, International Journal of PharmaceuticsClinical testing of an inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine candidate in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in healthy adults in Vietnam
2016, VaccineCitation Excerpt :Whole virus vaccines have indeed the potential to be more immunogenic than split-virus or subunit vaccines in previously unvaccinated populations [12,13]. Moreover, and again, following the lead from prior studies the vaccine was adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide [14,15]. While recognizing that significant variability occurs across different laboratories in the use of HAI and microneutralization assays to evaluate influenza vaccines, our vaccine compares favorably to similar vaccines developed/tested in the United States [16], using a 15 mcg dose of a H5 subunit vaccine, and are similar to the ones reported for aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted vaccines manufactured in Japan [17], Russia [18], China [19], and Thailand [20].
An oil-in-water nanoemulsion enhances immunogenicity of H5N1 vaccine in mice
2016, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine