Elsevier

Waste Management

Volume 32, Issue 12, December 2012, Pages 2248-2257
Waste Management

Chemical, physical and microbial properties and microbial diversity in manufactured soils produced from co-composting green waste and biosolids

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.034Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of adding biosolids to a green waste feedstock (100% green waste, 25% v/v biosolids or 50% biosolids) on the properties of composted products were investigated. Following initial composting, 20% soil or 20% fly ash/river sand mix was added to the composts as would be carried out commercially to produce manufactured soil. Temperatures during composting reached 50 °C, or above, for 23 days when biosolids were included as a composting feedstock but temperatures barely reached 40 °C when green waste alone was composted. Addition of biosolids to the feedstock increased total N, EC, extractable NH4, NO3 and P but lowered pH, macroporosity, water holding capacity, microbial biomass C and basal respiration in composts. Additions of soil or ash/sand to the composts greatly increased the available water holding capacity of the materials. Principal component analysis (PCA) of PCR-DGGE 16S rDNA amplicons separated bacterial communities according to addition of soil to the compost. For fungal ITS-RNA amplicons, PCA separated communities based on the addition of biosolids. Bacterial species richness and Shannon’s diversity index were greatest for composts where soil had been added but for fungal communities these parameters were greatest in the treatments where 50% biosolids had been included. These results were interpreted in relation to soil having an inoculation effect and biosolids having an acidifying effect thereby favouring a fungal community.

Highlights

► Chemical, physical and microbial properties of green waste composts. ► Increasing additions of biosolids increased EC, extractable N and P. ► Decreased pH and microbial activity but increased fungal richness. ► PCA separated fungal communities based on biosolids addition.

Introduction

In most cities in the developed world, green waste (also known as yard waste), which is composed of tree wood and bark, prunings from young trees and shrubs, dead and green leaves and grass clippings, is collected separately from other wastes. It is normally mechanically shredded and then composted, either alone or with other organic wastes. It is then used in products such as garden mulches and composts, organic soil amendments, soilless potting media, and particularly in Australia, manufactured “topsoils” for landscaping purposes. For the latter product, small quantities (e.g. 10–20% v/v) of inorganic additives (e.g. fly ash, sand, soil) are often blended with the compost and it is then used as a topsoil substitute. Little is known regarding the properties of these manufactured soil materials.

Decomposition of green waste during composting is characteristically slow and in order to initiate intense microbial activity, the addition of a more readily decomposable material (e.g. animal manure, grease trap waste) is required (Francou et al., 2008, Belyaeva and Haynes, 2010). Biosolids, which are also produced by municipalities in large quantities, may well be a suitable organic material since there is, characteristically, intense microbial activity during its composting (Epstein, 2003). Indeed, in order to stabilise and sanitise biosolids, they are often composted before use. This normally involves blending dewatered biosolids with a bulking agent (added to give adequate aeration), and green waste would act as such an agent.

The composting process includes four phases: (i) an initial decomposition phase, (ii) a thermophilic phase of intense microbial decomposition, (iii) a second thermophilic phase, and (iv) a maturation phase. Rapidly multiplying thermophilic bacterial species dominate during the thermophilic phase but once the bulk of the easily decomposable substrate is exhausted, the majority of the remaining material is woody, lignin-dominated material plus stabilised humic material and fungi tend to dominate (Ryckeboer et al., 2003). Although succession of bacterial (Adams and Frostick, 2009, Partanen et al., 2010), fungal (Hansgate et al., 2005, Bonito et al., 2010) and archaeal (Yamamoto et al., 2011) communities during the composting phases for specific wastes has been investigated by a number of workers using molecular techniques (e.g. PCR-DGGE) very little is known about the comparative nature of the microbial communities in matured composts derived from different materials. Klammer et al. (2008) did, however, show that there were clear distinctions between bacterial communities present in matured composts made from biowastes versus sewage sludge. The addition of other materials such as fly ash and soil to the matured compost presumably has an inoculation-effect and this is likely to influence the microbial community present.

The aim of this study was to investigate composting intensity and the chemical, physical and microbial properties and bacterial and fungal diversity, in composts made from green waste alone of green waste plus 25% or 50% v/v biosolids. From a practical viewpoint, the 25% biosolids treatment represents greenwaste compost where biosolids have been added to increase composting intensity while 50% biosolids represents composted biosolids where green waste was the bulking agent. Following initial compost production, the products were amended with 20% topsoil, or 10% coal fly ash plus 10% river sand (to produce manufactured soil material) and allowed to mature.

Section snippets

Materials and composting

Municipal green waste, originating from the Brisbane City Council, was collected from a pile at Phoenix Power Recyclers, Yatala, Queensland, soon after it had been mechanically shredded. It had a particle size distribution of: >5 mm = 55%, 2–5 mm = 26% and <2 mm = 19%. Recently-deposited fly ash was collected from the fly ash disposal lagoon at Tarong Power Station, 80 km west of Brisbane. Particle size distribution of the ash was: 100–200 μm = 9%, 50–100 μm = 36%, 2–50 μm = 52% and <2 μm = 3%. The fly ash was the

Properties of the materials

The pH of green waste and biosolids was alkaline and that of the fly ash, soil and sand acidic (Table 1). EC of biosolids was considerably greater than that of other materials used. Biosolids and green waste had a similar organic C contents but biosolids had a much greater content of total N, exchangeable Mg and extractable P than the other materials. As expected, fly ash and sand had very low C and N contents. They also had very low exchangeable Ca, Mg and extractable P contents. The biosolids

Discussion

The woody nature of green waste alone (Francou et al., 2008, Belyaeva and Haynes, 2009) resulted in slow decomposition and as a result, temperatures during composting barely reached 40 °C. By contrast, microbial activity during composting biosolids is characteristically high (Epstein, 2003) and in this study composting temperatures were maintained at about 50 °C for about 23 days in both the 25B and 50B treatments. This rapid, intense microbial activity results in faster composting, shorter

Conclusions

Addition of biosolids to a green waste feedstock greatly increased microbial activity during composting but, surprisingly, decreased it in the resulting matured composts. Indeed, the high N, P and salinity and acidity generation in 50% biosolids composts decreased bacterial diversity and the size and activity of the microbial community although it did result in an increase in the richness and diversity of the fungal community. Green waste and green waste-biosolids composts had a low available

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Vievers of Tarong Energy for supplying the fly ash, Phoenix Power Recyclers for supplying the shredded municipal green waste, SEQ Water for supplying the Biosolids, Katherine Raymont for assistance with C and N analysis and David Appleton of the School of Land, Crop and Food Sciences Analytical Services Group for analysis of metals and mineral N.

References (45)

  • J.D.W. Adams et al.

    Analysis of bacterial activity, biomass and diversity during windrow composting

    Waste Manage.

    (2009)
  • Anderson, J.P.E., 1982. Soil respiration. In: Page, A.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical, and...
  • J.P.E. Anderson et al.

    Measurement of bacterial and fungal contributions to respiration of selected agricultural and forest soils

    Can. J. Microbiol.

    (1975)
  • E. Baath et al.

    Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2003)
  • V.L. Bailey et al.

    Novel antibiotics as inhibitors for the selective respiratory inhibition method of measuring fungal:bacterial ratios in soil

    Biol. Fertil. Soils

    (2003)
  • O.N. Belyaeva et al.

    Chemical, microbial and physical properties of manufactured soils produced by co-composting municipal green waste with coal fly ash

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • O.N. Belyaeva et al.

    A comparison of the properties of manufactured soils produced from composting municipal green waste alone or with poultry manure or grease trap/septage waste

    Biol. Fertil. Soils

    (2010)
  • Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H., 1986. Particle density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and...
  • L. Boddy et al.

    Wood decomposition, higher fungi and their role in nutrient redistribution

    Can. J. Bot. Rev.

    (1995)
  • G. Bonito et al.

    Identification of fungi associated with municipal compost using DNA-based techniques

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • CCME, 2005. Guidelines for compost quality – PN 1340. Canada Council of Minist ers of the Environment. Winnipeg,...
  • CEM, 1993. Microwave sample preparation note for banana leaves. Application Note AG 13. CEM Corporation, Mathews, North...
  • W. DeBoer et al.

    Living in the fungal world: impact of fungi on soil, bacterial niche development

    FEMS Microbiology Reviews

    (2005)
  • Environmental Protection Authority, 1997. South Australian Biosolids Guidelines for Safe Handling, Reuse or Disposal of...
  • E. Epstein

    Land Application of Sewage Sludge and Biosolids

    (2003)
  • C. Francou et al.

    Influence of green waste, biowaste and paper-cardboard initial ratios on organic matter transformations during composting

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2008)
  • K.E. Giller et al.

    Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (1997)
  • A.M. Hansgate et al.

    Molecular characterization of fungal community dynamics in the initial stages of composting

    FEMS Microb. Ecol.

    (2005)
  • R.J. Haynes et al.

    Inorganic and organic constituents and contaminants of biosolids: implications for land application

    Adv. Agron.

    (2009)
  • R.F. Isbell

    The Australian Soil Classification

    (2002)
  • S. Klammer et al.

    Bacterial community patterns and thermal analyses of composts of various origins

    Waste Manage. Res.

    (2008)
  • C. Matthies et al.

    Effects of pH on the comparative culturability of fungi and bacteria from acidic and less acidic forest soils

    J. Basic Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Coal wastes: handling, pollution, impacts, and utilization

      2023, The Coal Handbook: Volume 2: Towards Cleaner Coal Utilization, 2nd Edition
    • Biochar incorporation increased nitrogen and carbon retention in a waste-derived soil

      2019, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Increased use globally is driving a range of detrimental impacts on topsoils, including decreased agricultural productivity and enhanced release of greenhouse gases (Harter et al., 2014). The effective production, deployment, and management of manufactured topsoils may serve as a means of alleviating pressure on topsoil resources, alongside low-impact waste management (Arbestain et al., 2009; Belyaeva and Haynes, 2009; Belyaeva et al., 2012; Braga et al., 2019; Mattei et al., 2017). However, to ensure its effective and sustainable deployment, a detailed understanding of the complex nutrient dynamics and key system influencers is first required.

    • Effects of seaweed fertilizer on enzyme activities, metabolic characteristics, and bacterial communities during maize straw composting

      2019, Bioresource Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The TOC contents further declined to 38.5%, 35.2%, and 32.0% for CK, S1, and S2, respectively, by day 42. The TOC loss can be attributed to microbial activity and mineralization of organic matter during the composting process (Belyaeva et al., 2012). The rich microbial community in seaweed fertilizer rapidly broke down the easily decomposable organic matter, which contributed to the greater TOC loss in S1 and S2.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text