Original ArticleComparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Introduction
Lumbar interbody fusion is now a common method to treat certain degenerative conditions such as refractory, symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Numerous approaches exist for obtaining interbody fusion including posterior, transforaminal, anterior, and lateral or oblique minimally invasive retroperitoneal. Each approach has its own risk-and-benefit profile.1
Some experts have suggested that lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has the potential to achieve increased segmental lordosis (SL) and lumbar lordosis (LL) when compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Increased lordosis is an important radiographic parameter because sagittal alignment has been correlated with patient-reported outcomes, both preoperatively2, 3 and postoperatively.4 Given the purported advantage of LLIF over TLIF for segmental lordosis, this study compared the change in spinal sagittal alignment in patients who underwent either single-level LLIF or TLIF. It was hypothesized that LLIF would lead to increased segmental, regional, and global sagittal alignment.
Section snippets
Methods
Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan before conducting this study. We retrospectively identified 182 patients who underwent TLIF or LLIF since January 2014 at a single institution by a single surgeon. Both traditional open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) TLIFs were identified and included because while the approaches differed, the critical portions of the procedure were similar, including facetectomy, diskectomy, end plate preparation,
Results
A total of 40 patients were analyzed, consisting of 20 patients in the LLIF group and 20 patients in the TLIF group. Four patients had interbody fusion performed at the L2-3 level, 8 patients at the L3-4 level, and 28 patients at the L4-5 level. Average patient radiographic follow-up was 14.6 months ± 6.1. There were no significant differences between groups in gender, age, levels treated, diagnosis, or baseline radiographic characteristics (Table 1).
Single-level LLIF resulted in a mean
Discussion
Over the past several years, there has been an increased focus on sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters.6, 7 Furthermore, there is evidence that improved lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis correlate with improved outcomes.8, 9, 10 Our results show that there is a significantly higher amount of SL achieved by single-level LLIF compared with single-level TLIF. However, our results do not show a statistically significant difference between single-level LLIF and TLIF in regional or global
Conclusion
Single-level LLIF resulted in greater improvements in segmental lordosis when compared with single-level TLIF. However, there was no difference in regional or global sagittal alignment with either procedure. These results suggest that the impact of a single-level fusion on regional or global alignment is limited.
References (25)
- et al.
Does restoration of focal lumbar lordosis for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis result in better patient-reported clinical outcomes? A systematic literature review
J Clin Neurosci
(2017) - et al.
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF
J Spine Surg
(2015) - et al.
Baseline patient-reported outcomes correlate weakly with radiographic parameters: a multicenter, prospective NIH adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis study of 286 patients
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2016) - et al.
Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2013) - et al.
Segmental lumbar lordosis: manual versus computer-assisted measurement using seven different techniques
J Spinal Disord Tech
(2004) - et al.
Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion
J Neurosurg Spine
(2017) - et al.
Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery
Spine
(2010) - et al.
Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up
Eur Spine J
(2015) - et al.
Restoration of lordosis and disk height after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Orthop Surg
(2012) - et al.
Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
(2015)
Lumbar lordosis: a study of angle values and of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs role
Acta Ortop Bras
Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Cited by (40)
Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion (PTP LIF) with Anterior Docking: Preliminary functional and radiographic outcomes
2023, North American Spine Society JournalComparing clinical and radiological outcomes between single-level OLIF and XLIF: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, North American Spine Society Journal
Conflict of interest statement: P.P. is a consultant for Allosource, Globus Medical, NuVasive, and Medtronic and has received royalties from Globus Medical and research support from Pfizer and Vertex.