Original ArticlePrediction of Early Intracranial Hypertension After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study
Introduction
High intracranial pressure (ICP) is associated with poor outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI).1 Continuous monitoring of ICP is recommended in cases of severe TBI to detect and treat early high intracranial pressure (EHICP) episodes.2 A significant percentage of patients do not have access to this method of monitoring.3, 4 Moreover, EHICP occurring during the first hours posttrauma has been associated with an increased mortality rate after TBI.5 Noninvasive methods for high ICP detection have been proposed to shorten the delay in achieving more efficient and effective high ICP therapy. They primarily focus on developing strategies that enable nonspecialized centers to differentiate those patients that should be transferred to a neurocritical care unit (NCCU) from those that can be maintained in secondary care centers where they are awakened relatively shortly after injury without the need for ICP probe placement.
Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound (US), head computed tomography (CT) scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging have proved reliable in identifying high ICP.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Recently, Robba et al.10 have interestingly described the combination of ONSD ultrasonography and venous transcranial Doppler (TCD) of the straight sinus for identifying high ICP in a mixed cohort of patients with acute brain injury. Given the unavoidable delays of invasive monitoring by ICP placement and because TCD is systematically performed in a repeated manner after severe TBI, our aim was to investigate the role of clinical signs, TCD, ONSD, and CT scan measurements to discriminate patients that subsequently experience EHICP (EHICP+) from those that do not (EHICP−). We selected patients with severe TBI who were exposed to EHICP because this population has an increased mortality rate.5, 11
Section snippets
Study Design
This was a prospective, observational study conducted in a surgical critical care unit, level 1 trauma center. Patients with severe TBI were admitted from September 2015 through March 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with severe TBI defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 who benefited from ICP monitoring, with medical support within 3 hours after injury, and requiring mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, <18 years of age, a previous ocular
Study Population
Details of the patients with TBI are presented in Table 1. Eighty-four patients were identified during the study period. Among them, 5 patients did not receive invasive ICP monitoring and 6 patients had orbital trauma. Fifteen patients benefited from ICP monitoring after surgical evacuation of an intracranial mass lesion. PI values of 4 patients were not interpretable because of absent or bad acoustic window. Finally, 54 severe TBI cases were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four hours
Discussion
Our study assessed the ability of initial clinical features, PI calculation, both US and CT ONSD measurements, and Marshall CT classification to predict EHICP after severe TBI. We confirmed that initial clinical features were not discriminating enough to identify those patients who would subsequently experience EHICP from those who would not.14 It was the same for the IP calculation. We found that both US and CT ONDS measurements, and diffuse injury III and IV scores in the Marshall
Conclusions
None of the clinical features of the patients or noninvasive tools assessed herein enabled clinicians to strictly ascertain EHICP− diagnosis. Presently, early ICP invasive monitoring certainly remains the best severe TBI-related outcome improvement strategy. In addition, we confirmed the utility of ONSD measurements in the first hours after severe TBI for selecting patients with a high probability of EHICP. Further studies are needed to confirm the roles for these predictive tools in patient
References (29)
- et al.
Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in normal adults
Eur J Ultrasound
(2002) - et al.
Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury
Intensive Care Med
(2015) - et al.
Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition
Neurosurgery
(2017) - et al.
European brain injury consortium: intensive care management of head-injured patients in Europe: a survey from the European brain injury consortium
Intensive Care Med
(2001) - et al.
Intracranial pressure dose and outcome in traumatic brain injury
Neurocrit Care
(2013) - et al.
Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Intensive Care Med
(2011) - et al.
Ultrasonography of the optic nerve in neurocritically ill patients
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
(2011) - et al.
Optic nerve sheath diameter on computed tomography is correlated with simultaneously measured intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury
Intensive Care Med
(2014) - et al.
Use of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure
Crit Care
(2008)
Ultrasound non-invasive measurement of intracranial pressure in neurointensive care: a prospective observational study
PLoS Med
The course of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury: relation with outcome and CT-characteristics
Neurocrit Care
Surgical management of traumatic brain injury author group: surgical management of traumatic parenchymal lesions
Neurosurgery
The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography
J Neurotrauma
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.