Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 127, July 2019, Pages e1242-e1248
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Prediction of Early Intracranial Hypertension After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.121Get rights and content

Objective

This study aimed to assess the reliability of clinical features, noninvasive transcranial Doppler-related pulsatility index (PI) calculation, and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasound (US) and initial computed tomography (CT) scan (Marshall CT scan classification) in predicting the occurrence of early (<24 hours) high intracranial pressure (EHICP) (>20 mm Hg) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

We conducted an observational prospective study in a level 1 trauma center. Patients were measured simultaneously for PI and US ONSD in the triage zone. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who had EHICP after TBI (EHICP+) and those who did not (EHICP−).

Results

Fifty-four patients were included; 32 were categorized as EHICP+ and 22 as EHICP−. PI >1.4 did not correlate with EHICP+ patients (69% vs. 46%, P = 0.09). US ONSD measurement was higher in the EHICP+ group (6.25; range, 6–6.95 vs. 5.7; range, 5.2–6.4; P = 0.005). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for US ONSD as a predictor of developing EHICP was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–0.86). CT ONSD measurement was higher in the EHICP+ group (6.71; range, 6.35–7.87 vs. 6.25; range, 5.8–6.93; P = 0.04). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CT ONSD measurement as a predictor for EHICP+ was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.53–0.81). The diffuse injury III and IV categories in the Marshall CT scan classification were associated with the occurrence of EHICP (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

None of the clinical features or noninvasive tools assessed in this study enabled clinicians to strictly ascertain EHICP. Further studies are needed to establish their potential role before intracranial pressure probe insertion.

Introduction

High intracranial pressure (ICP) is associated with poor outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI).1 Continuous monitoring of ICP is recommended in cases of severe TBI to detect and treat early high intracranial pressure (EHICP) episodes.2 A significant percentage of patients do not have access to this method of monitoring.3, 4 Moreover, EHICP occurring during the first hours posttrauma has been associated with an increased mortality rate after TBI.5 Noninvasive methods for high ICP detection have been proposed to shorten the delay in achieving more efficient and effective high ICP therapy. They primarily focus on developing strategies that enable nonspecialized centers to differentiate those patients that should be transferred to a neurocritical care unit (NCCU) from those that can be maintained in secondary care centers where they are awakened relatively shortly after injury without the need for ICP probe placement.

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound (US), head computed tomography (CT) scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging have proved reliable in identifying high ICP.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Recently, Robba et al.10 have interestingly described the combination of ONSD ultrasonography and venous transcranial Doppler (TCD) of the straight sinus for identifying high ICP in a mixed cohort of patients with acute brain injury. Given the unavoidable delays of invasive monitoring by ICP placement and because TCD is systematically performed in a repeated manner after severe TBI, our aim was to investigate the role of clinical signs, TCD, ONSD, and CT scan measurements to discriminate patients that subsequently experience EHICP (EHICP+) from those that do not (EHICP−). We selected patients with severe TBI who were exposed to EHICP because this population has an increased mortality rate.5, 11

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a prospective, observational study conducted in a surgical critical care unit, level 1 trauma center. Patients with severe TBI were admitted from September 2015 through March 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with severe TBI defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 who benefited from ICP monitoring, with medical support within 3 hours after injury, and requiring mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, <18 years of age, a previous ocular

Study Population

Details of the patients with TBI are presented in Table 1. Eighty-four patients were identified during the study period. Among them, 5 patients did not receive invasive ICP monitoring and 6 patients had orbital trauma. Fifteen patients benefited from ICP monitoring after surgical evacuation of an intracranial mass lesion. PI values of 4 patients were not interpretable because of absent or bad acoustic window. Finally, 54 severe TBI cases were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four hours

Discussion

Our study assessed the ability of initial clinical features, PI calculation, both US and CT ONSD measurements, and Marshall CT classification to predict EHICP after severe TBI. We confirmed that initial clinical features were not discriminating enough to identify those patients who would subsequently experience EHICP from those who would not.14 It was the same for the IP calculation. We found that both US and CT ONDS measurements, and diffuse injury III and IV scores in the Marshall

Conclusions

None of the clinical features of the patients or noninvasive tools assessed herein enabled clinicians to strictly ascertain EHICP− diagnosis. Presently, early ICP invasive monitoring certainly remains the best severe TBI-related outcome improvement strategy. In addition, we confirmed the utility of ONSD measurements in the first hours after severe TBI for selecting patients with a high probability of EHICP. Further studies are needed to confirm the roles for these predictive tools in patient

References (29)

  • H.C. Patel et al.

    Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • S.A. Ballantyne et al.

    Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in normal adults

    Eur J Ultrasound

    (2002)
  • F. Güiza et al.

    Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury

    Intensive Care Med

    (2015)
  • N. Carney et al.

    Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition

    Neurosurgery

    (2017)
  • N. Stocchetti et al.

    European brain injury consortium: intensive care management of head-injured patients in Europe: a survey from the European brain injury consortium

    Intensive Care Med

    (2001)
  • K.N. Sheth et al.

    Intracranial pressure dose and outcome in traumatic brain injury

    Neurocrit Care

    (2013)
  • J. Dubourg et al.

    Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Intensive Care Med

    (2011)
  • R. Moretti et al.

    Ultrasonography of the optic nerve in neurocritically ill patients

    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

    (2011)
  • M.S. Sekhon et al.

    Optic nerve sheath diameter on computed tomography is correlated with simultaneously measured intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

    Intensive Care Med

    (2014)
  • T. Geeraerts et al.

    Use of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure

    Crit Care

    (2008)
  • C. Robba et al.

    Ultrasound non-invasive measurement of intracranial pressure in neurointensive care: a prospective observational study

    PLoS Med

    (2017)
  • R. Bremmer et al.

    The course of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury: relation with outcome and CT-characteristics

    Neurocrit Care

    (2010)
  • M.R. Bullock et al.

    Surgical management of traumatic brain injury author group: surgical management of traumatic parenchymal lesions

    Neurosurgery

    (2006)
  • L.F. Marshall et al.

    The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography

    J Neurotrauma

    (1992)
  • Cited by (16)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    View full text