Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 102, January 2020, 106656
Epilepsy & Behavior

A patient-centered approach to understanding long-term psychosocial adjustment and meaning-making, 15 to 20 years after epilepsy surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106656Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Many patients consider surgery as a major life turning point.

  • Early postsurgery (< 5 years), psychosocial disequilibrium was commonly described.

  • Patients' narratives revealed a process of actively reestablishing equilibrium.

  • Patients differed in how they reestablished this sense of equilibrium.

  • A key difference was whether patients reported a lasting change in self-identity.

Abstract

Objective

Different psychosocial trajectories have been identified following treatment with epilepsy surgery, as patients adjust to possible changes in seizure frequency and the subsequent impact on their psychosocial functioning. Qualitative research has been key to understanding this adjustment process, particularly in the short-term (2–5 years). Currently, however, there is a lack of qualitative research examining longer-term (> 15 years) outcomes, precluding the same rich, detailed understanding of longer-term psychosocial outcomes. Using a grounded theory approach, we explored how patients reflected on and made sense of their adjustment trajectories, 15 to 20 years after surgery. This included the impact of surgery on their sense of self and broader psychosocial functioning.

Methods

We recruited 40 adult patients who had undergone anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) 15 to 20 years ago (24 females; 26 left-sided). Median age at habitual seizure onset was 9.7 years (Interquartile range; IQR = 13.8), and at surgery was 31 years (IQR = 12). Median length of follow-up was 18.4 years (IQR = 4.3). Comprehensive one-on-one interviews (median time = 86 min, IQR = 28) were used to elicit patient experiences of their surgery and subsequent psychosocial outcomes. Data were analyzed using a grounded theory inductive–deductive process.

Results

Patient narratives revealed a common process of psychosocial change and meaning-making triggered by surgery, which was often perceived as a major turning point in life. Patients reflected on moving through an early postsurgical period (< 5 years) of upheaval and psychological disequilibrium. While this period was often remembered as stressful, difficulties were softened and/or reframed in hindsight. Through this process of reframing and meaning-making, patients were able to reestablish equilibrium and a sense of normality. Differences were evident in how patients navigated the process of meaning-making, and the extent to which they felt surgery had changed their self-identity.

Discussion

We propose a model of postsurgical meaning-making, evident in the narratives of patients who have undergone ATL, providing a new perspective on long-term psychosocial outcomes. This model contributes to our understanding of patient well-being and quality of life, by acknowledging the active role that patients play in seeking to create their own sense of normality after epilepsy surgery.

Introduction

Epilepsy surgery is the recommended treatment for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, often resulting in better seizure and quality of life outcomes compared with ongoing treatment with medication [1]. Our current understanding of the impact of surgery on psychosocial functioning primarily spans the presurgical to initial five-year postsurgical period. This research has been invaluable for informing the short- to medium-term clinical management of patients undergoing this procedure by shedding light on the complex processes of learning to live without epilepsy or facing the uncertainty and disappointment of seizure recurrence [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]]. For some, successful surgery can result in a paradoxical increase in psychological distress and a process of identity change [3,4,8], and this research has provided clinicians with valuable information for improving early postsurgical psychosocial support [8]. Our understanding of the longer-term psychosocial adjustment process, however, is limited.

Research into long-term (> 15 years) psychosocial outcomes of epilepsy surgery generally shows improvements along with improved quality of life, particularly for those who achieve good seizure outcome [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. Much of this research, however, focuses on the achievement of specific social milestones, commonly driving, employment, and rates of marriage. Alternatively, research focusing on psychological outcomes has been predominantly restricted to a few studies examining rates of depression and/or anxiety long-term [[14], [15], [16], [17]]. Far less is known about patient perspectives of the outcomes of their surgery, the possible resolution of early adjustment issues, and broader markers of psychosocial functioning. Likewise, no research has examined the active role that patients might play in making sense of their surgical outcomes and its impact on self-identity, despite two long-term studies alluding to the occurrence of ‘identity crises’ after the early follow-up period [17,18].

Qualitative research is key to achieving this deeper level of psychological understanding. Qualitative research provides valuable insights into the experience of living with epilepsy across the lifespan [[19], [20], [21], [22]], and allows researchers to examine the phenomenology of patient experiences and psychosocial processes not captured by statistical methods. To date, however, there are only two qualitative studies of the longer-term psychosocial outcomes of epilepsy surgery [17,23]. One of these, from our research group, focused specifically on patient experiences as they relate to the achievement of social milestones [23], while the other focused on patient expectations and the perceived costs and benefits of surgery [17]. No study to date has explored the psychosocial adjustment trajectories of patients in detail, including any impact on patient self-identity, giving rise to the aim of this study. In particular, we sought to develop a model of the process by which patients adjust to and make sense of their decision to undergo epilepsy surgery and its subsequent impact on their long-term psychosocial functioning.

Section snippets

Study design

The grounded theory approach of Glaser and Strauss was chosen, because of its benefits for exploring understudied topics and understanding psychosocial processes [19,[24], [25], [26]]. Grounded theory also considers ‘negative cases’ (i.e., those typically considered outliers in quantitative research), thereby capturing the true diversity of patient experiences. This is extremely valuable because patient adjustment trajectories, either in the face of a new illness or following major treatment,

A process of postsurgical meaning-making

The core category, or main process identified in the patient narratives, was one of meaning-making. Patient narratives demonstrated that surgery was a major life turning point, and there was a need to make meaning of the decision to undergo surgery given the changes it brought and the impact it had on postsurgical psychosocial functioning. Main themes and subthemes underlying this core category are shown in Fig. 1.

Evident from these themes, meaning-making was triggered following surgery when

Discussion

Using a grounded theory approach, we have developed a theoretical model describing how patients reflect on and make meaning of the experience of undergoing epilepsy surgery, 15 to 20 years later. This model provides a useful long-term framework and aligns with existing literature on the psychosocial outcomes of epilepsy surgery, as well as the broader literature on meaning-making and chronic illness [37].

Conclusion

This study provides important insights into how patients make sense of the outcomes of their epilepsy surgery. Our model is consistent not only with findings from the epilepsy surgery literature but also the wider psychological and sociological literature on the impact of chronic illness on an individual's sense of self and well-being. Our findings also provide clinically relevant information for counseling patients pre- and postsurgery about the different stages of psychosocial adjustment and

Ethical publication statement

We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Declaration of competing interest

None to report.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Sam Berkovic from the Melbourne Brain Centre, Austin Health and Dr. Marie O'Shea from the Neuropsychology Department, Austin Health for their input and support with recruitment and data collection. Thank you also to Prof. Terry O'Brien for his support of the larger project in which this study is included.

A special thank you also to all of the patients who volunteered their time and stories for the study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (58)

  • S.J. Wilson et al.

    Characterizing psychosocial outcome trajectories following seizure surgery

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2005)
  • A. Jacoby et al.

    Quality-of-life trajectories in epilepsy: a review of the literature

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2008)
  • A.E. Elsharkawy et al.

    Determinants of quality of life in patients with refractory focal epilepsy who were not eligible for surgery or who rejected surgery

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2012)
  • S. Baxendale et al.

    “If I didn't have epilepsy …”: patient expectations of epilepsy surgery

    J Epilepsy

    (1996)
  • S.J. Wilson et al.

    Outcome of temporal lobectomy: expectations and the prediction of perceived success

    Epilepsy Res

    (1999)
  • I. Wheelock

    Expectations and life changes associated with surgery for intractable epilepsy

    J Epilepsy

    (1998)
  • S.R. Dewar et al.

    Perceptions of epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and an explanatory model of decision-making

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2015)
  • S. Baxendale

    When epilepsy surgery fails

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2014)
  • F. Berna et al.

    Impaired ability to give a meaning to personally significant events in patients with schizophrenia

    Conscious Cogn

    (2011)
  • S. Wiebe et al.

    A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • S. Wilson

    The “burden of normality”: concepts of adjustment after surgery for seizures

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • P.F. Bladin

    Psychosocial difficulties and outcome after temporal lobectomy

    Epilepsia

    (1992)
  • J.F. Téllez-Zenteno et al.

    Long-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes of epilepsy surgery

    Curr Treat Options Neurol

    (2008)
  • S.J. Wilson et al.

    The burden of normality: a framework for rehabilitation after epilepsy surgery

    Epilepsia

    (2007)
  • L. Hamiwka et al.

    Social outcomes after temporal or extratemporal epilepsy surgery: a systematic review

    Epilepsia

    (2011)
  • S. Dupont et al.

    Long-term prognosis and psychosocial outcomes after surgery for MTLE

    Epilepsia

    (2006)
  • J.E. Jones et al.

    Life outcomes of anterior temporal lobectomy: serial long-term follow-up evaluations

    Neurosurgery

    (2013)
  • B. Mathon et al.

    Predictive factors of long-term outcomes of surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis

    Epilepsia

    (2017)
  • C. Taft et al.

    Health-related quality of life, mood, and patient satisfaction after epilepsy surgery in Sweden — a prospective controlled observational study

    Epilepsia

    (2014)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Psychosocial outcomes of repeated treatment of seizure clusters with midazolam nasal spray: Results of a phase 3, open-label extension trial

      2023, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition to improved seizure control, treatment success in epilepsy is dependent on multiple factors including psychosocial adjustment [19]. Measuring psychosocial outcomes and processes in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy or after epilepsy surgery has been invaluable for informing clinical management, including improved psychosocial support and early treatment interventions based on psychological predictors of outcome [20,21]. Clinical trials have shown MDZ-NS to be effective and to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile for the treatment of seizure clusters [12,13].

    • Experiences of emotional and psychosocial functioning after frontal lobe resection for epilepsy

      2021, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      These negative experiences might be associated with the concept burden of normality, i. e., related to the new life situation in which expectations and demands rapidly change when a person becomes seizure free and therefore by others regarded as healthy [36–38]. Coleman et al. [21] recently found that this kind of reorientation in life is described as crucial during the first five years after epilepsy surgery and after that most of the patients have adapted to the new life situation. Since the majority of patients in our study were interviewed more than five years post-surgery, the negative experiences described cannot be attributed to a reorientation phase but understood as more long-term.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text