Research PaperProtective effect of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer
Introduction
Surgical treatment of early cervical cancer has become a matter of debate in recent years, especially after the publishing of the surprising findings of the multicentre randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial [1]. In this trial, minimally invasive surgery led to worse outcome compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Mechanical manipulation of the tumour during surgery and tumour spillage in the peritoneal cavity have been discussed as potential causes for these findings [1], but further investigations are needed to confirm this hypothesis or to identify other mechanisms with a negative impact on the outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. A few recent retrospective studies suggested a protective effect of pre-operative conization before the minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer [[2], [3], [4]]. This is most likely due to the pre-operative removal of the tumour reducing the possibility of tumour manipulation and spillage during the surgery. Notably, this protective effect of pre-operative conization has been only demonstrated in patient populations treated with minimally invasive surgery, in which the use of pneumoperitoneum is a known risk factor for recurrences [5]. To improve the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of a protective influence of pre-operative conization, further studies including patients treated with abdominal radical hysterectomy are needed.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the use of pre-operative conization to prevent recurrences in patients with cervical cancer independently of surgical approach. For this purpose, we performed an analysis of a large prospectively-maintained population-based cohort of patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Data on patients with cervical cancer originating from the prospectively-maintained population-based clinical cancer registries of Regensburg (Bavaria, Germany) and Magdeburg (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany) were analysed. These two high-quality population-based regional cancer registries were founded in 1991 and cover a population of more than 3 million people of Upper Palatinate, Lower Bavaria and north Saxony-Anhalt. Following a stringent protocol, these cancer registries obtain a cross-sectorial
Results
The median follow-up was 5.4 years (range 0.13–9.20 years). During the study period, 28 (11.9%) recurrences were observed. Notably, no recurrence occurred in patients with FIGO stage IA tumors; therefore, these patients were excluded from further analyses.
We further analysed the 177 patients with FIGO stage IB1 and tumour ≤2 cm after stratification for the type of pre-operative diagnosis: 58 patients (32.8%) underwent a pre-operative cervical conization, whereas in 119 (67.2%) patients, the
Discussion
In this retrospective cohort study, pre-operative conization had a favourable effect on the recurrence rates in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumour size ≤2 cm, and consequently, was associated with better DFS. These results are in accordance with some recent studies [2,4,11]. Casarin et al. found that tumour size >2 cm and pre-operative conization are important factors associated with survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer [4]. The protective effect of
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author contribution
PG, carried out the study design and statistical analysis and participated in drafting the manuscript, ST, collected the data and participated in analysis of the clinical data; JM, participated in collecting the data analysis of the clinical data; MG, participated in study design and analysis of the clinical data; MK, participated in designing the study and analysis of the clinical data; GT, participated in collecting the data analysis of the clinical data; OO, participated in designing the
References (14)
- et al.
Preoperative conization and risk of recurrence in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study
J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.
(2021) - et al.
Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: what is the gold standard?
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2015) - et al.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Lancet.
(2007) - et al.
A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Gynecol. Oncol.
(1999) - et al.
Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.
(2018) - et al.
ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
(2021) - et al.
Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis
Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
(2020)
Cited by (6)
Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume early-stage cervical cancer
2024, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe efficacy of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
2023, European Journal of Surgical OncologyBeyond Sentinel Lymph Node: Outcomes of Indocyanine Green-Guided Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial and Cervical Cancer
2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthSurvival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology