Barriers to the use of toxicogenomics data in human health risk assessment: A survey of Canadian risk assessors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.01.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Use of toxicogenomics data in human health risk assessment is marginal.

  • Risk assessors' knowledge limits toxicogenomics use in human health risk assessment.

  • Training and standardized guidelines are needed to support risk assessors.

  • Modernising human health risk assessment requires organizational leadership.

Abstract

Regulatory agencies worldwide need to modernize human health risk assessment (HHRA) to meet challenges of the 21st century. Toxicogenomics is at the core of this improvement. Today, however, the use of toxicogenomics data in HHRA is very limited. The purpose of this survey was to identify barriers to the application of toxicogenomics data in HHRA by human health risk assessors. An online survey targeting Canadian risk assessors gathered information on their knowledge and perception of toxicogenomics, their current and future inclusion of toxicogenomics data in HHRA, and barriers to the use of such data. Twenty-nine (29) participants completed a questionnaire after 2 months of solicitation. The results show that the application of toxicogenomics data in Canada is marginal, with 85% of respondents reporting that they never or rarely used such data. Knowledge of toxicogenomics by Canadian risk assessors is also limited: about two-thirds of respondents (68%) were not at all or only slightly familiar with the concept. Lack of guidelines for toxicogenomics data interpretation, data quality assessment and on their use in HHRA, were found to be major barriers. In conclusion, there is a need for interventions aimed at facilitating the use of toxicogenomics data in HHRA, when available.

Introduction

Regulatory agencies worldwide have to adapt and improve human health risk assessment (HHRA) methods to meet challenges of the 21st century: a rapid increase in the number of chemicals to be assessed (in 2009, 87% of chemicals on the market lacked toxicity data) (Hartung, 2009), and the need for faster, more scientifically robust assessments. As such, they are encouraging the use of data generated by toxicogenomics technologies (Tralau and Luch, 2015). Large-scale programs aimed at exploiting toxicogenomics data in HHRA include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Tox21 (http://epa.gov/ncct/Tox21) launched after the publication of the National Research Council's (NRC) report Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy (NRC, 2007a). Besides, the SEURAT-1 research initiative was launched to develop alternative methods to replace animal testing of cosmetic products in the European Union (Gocht and Schwarz, 2015). Health Canada also began reflecting on this matter (CCA, 2012).

The potential of toxicogenomics in improving the HHRA process was recently examined in the literature (Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015, Chepelev et al., 2015, Goetz et al., 2011, Marx-Stoelting et al., 2015, McHale et al., 2010) and in various case studies (Bourdon et al., 2013, Burgoon et al., 2016, Euling et al., 2013, Moffat et al., 2015, Thomas et al., 2012, Wilson et al., 2013). Those studies showed that toxicogenomics research could be valuable at different stages of HHRA. First, toxicogenomics data can help in the hazard identification and characterization stages by facilitating the identification of mechanisms of action and allowing better in vitro to in vivo extrapolation and inter-/intra-species comparison. Secondly, toxicogenomics data can also contribute to the characterization of low-dose responses and thresholds, and help to investigate the transition between adaptive and toxic responses (Boverhof et al., 2011). Lastly, another significant advantage of toxicogenomics is the potential decrease in time and resources needed to generate toxicity data, compared to conventional testing on whole animals (NRC, 2007b).

Despite this strong interest from regulatory agencies, the use of toxicogenomics in HHRA remains very limited. For instance, in Canada, Bourdon-Lacombe et al. (2015) reported that between 2000 and 2013, only 2% of the evaluation from Health Canada Existing Substances Risk Assessment Bureau contained genomics information, and none in Canadian Drinking Water Quality programs (Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015). In the U.S., this proportion increases to 20% for EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program (Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015). Only a few authors have investigated the reasons for this limited use of toxicogenomics data by human health risk assessors. Potential barriers have been postulated, such as: difficulty in interpreting toxicogenomics data (Goetz et al., 2011, McHale et al., 2010, Pettit et al., 2010), lack of training or insufficient knowledge in risk assessors, dearth of standards and guidelines for toxicogenomics data quality assessment or proper application in HHRA (Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015, Euling et al., 2013, Goetz et al., 2011, Moffat et al., 2015, Pettit et al., 2010, Sturla et al., 2014, Tong et al., 2015), uncertainties regarding the utility of toxicogenomics in HHRA (Goetz et al., 2011, Pettit et al., 2010), and availability of toxicogenomics data (Chepelev et al., 2015, Euling et al., 2013, Moffat et al., 2015). However, very few studies have investigated these barriers systematically. Therefore, a more comprehensive and systematic scrutiny is needed.

One of those investigations surveyed mainly U.S. scientists regarding current and future use of toxicogenomics in risk assessment, as well as barriers to such a use (Pettit et al., 2010). However, it targeted scientists and decision-makers already involved in the field of toxicogenomics. Moreover, few respondents were from outside the U.S., leaving other countries, such as Canada, underrepresented. In order to fill this gap, a national survey was designed with the objectives of characterizing: 1) the current and future use of toxicogenomics data by Canadian human health risk assessors, 2) their knowledge of toxicogenomics, 3) their perceptions of the usefulness and potential impact of toxicogenomics on HHRA, and 4) the factors impeding the use of toxicogenomics data in HHRA in Canada.

Section snippets

Summary of methods

The complete methodology is described in the supplementary material. Briefly, an online questionnaire accessed through and completed on the FluidSurveys™ platform (http://fluidsurveys.com, Ottawa, ON, Canada) was designed based on a literature review of the topic (e.g. Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015, Boverhof et al., 2011, Chepelev et al., 2015, Goetz et al., 2011, Marx-Stoelting et al., 2015, McHale et al., 2010, Tong et al., 2015) and consultation with experts. To identify potential

Response rate

On a total of 39 questionnaires returned, 29 questionnaires were used for the analysis. Others were incomplete or not eligible. The response rate was difficult to ascertain because of recruitment methods, but would probably be less than 15%.

This sample is rather small, despite our recruitment efforts. The absence of a central list of Canadian human health risk assessors and the time constraints on the survey duration might have led to a possible selection bias which increased uncertainties

Conclusion

The use of toxicogenomics data in HHRA has the potential to better protect human populations from environmental exposure to toxicants through significantly improving the quality of HHRA conducted. This survey showed that human health risk assessors are quite positive about the use of toxicogenomics data in HHRA. However, its use in Canadian HHRA is very limited. This seems to be due in great part to: 1) human health risk assessors' lack of knowledge of toxicogenomics, 2) absence of guidelines

Declaration of interest

The authors' affiliations are shown on the cover page. They declare they have no conflict of interest.

Authorship contributions

This work was undertaken as part of JV's master's degree in community health at Université Laval, under the supervision of PL and CC. JV prepared the study, conducted the data collection and analysis, and wrote the manuscript. PL and CC contributed to the design, analysis and interpretation of the data, and to the writing of the final manuscript. MJR and MAS contributed to the development of the original protocol and did a critical review of the draft manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies [Grant No. 174533].

Supplementary material

Supplemental details on the complete methodology and additional results (Tables S1–S3, Fig. S1) are available in the supplementary material. English and French copies of the survey administered in this study are also available as supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Society of Toxicology of Canada (STC) and the Chapitre Saint-Laurent for their contribution to study recruitment. They also thank Reza Farmahin and Nikolai L. Chepelev of Health Canada for their review and comments on survey questions.

References (28)

  • L.D. Burgoon et al.

    Using in vitro high-throughput screening data for predicting benzo[k]fluoranthene human health hazards: benzo[k]fluoranthene human health hazards

    Risk Anal.

    (2016)
  • (CCA) Council of Canadian Academies

    Integrating Emerging Technologies into Chemical Safety Assessment

    (2012)
  • N.L. Chepelev et al.

    Integrating toxicogenomics into human health risk assessment: lessons learned from the benzo[a]pyrene case study

    Crit. Rev. Toxicol.

    (2015)
  • H.T.O. Davies et al.

    Developing learning organisations in the new NHS

    BMJ

    (2000)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Envisioning an international validation process for New Approach Methodologies in chemical hazard and risk assessment

      2021, Environmental Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite progress, the global toxicology community continues to puzzle over the best way to leverage NAMs in their daily workflows. International validation efforts for NAMs are progressing slowly, and recent survey data from toxicology professionals suggests that limited regulatory acceptance and complex data interpretation undermine the adoption and use of NAMs (Vachon et al. 2017; Zaunbrecher et al. 2017). Previous studies have highlighted that issues relating to the organizational and research landscape need to be addressed in order to accelerate the shift towards greater use of NAMs in regulatory risk assessment (Environment and Climate Change Canada 2016; Busquet and Hartung 2017; ICCVAM 2018; Standing Committee on Emerging Science for Environmental Health Decisions et al. 2018; Tickner et al. 2018; US EPA 2018).

    • Toxicogenomics: A Primer for Toxicologic Pathologists

      2021, Haschek and Rousseaux's Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology: Volume 1: Principles and Practice of Toxicologic Pathology
    • A bioinformatics workflow for the evaluation of RT-qPCR primer specificity: Application for the assessment of gene expression data reliability in toxicological studies

      2020, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, as previously stated, Actb is a highly expressed gene (Cq < 18.5) and gDNA contamination up to 7.5% did not meaningfully interfere with the assessment of its expression. Gene expression data can be used to complement conventional toxicological studies for chemical risk assessment (Yauk et al., 2019; Vachon et al., 2017; Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015). However, in the absence of transparent reporting on RNA quality controls, evaluation of primer design and experimental protocols, the reliability of RT-qPCR gene expression data can be difficult to judge (Bustin and Huggett, 2017; Bustin, 2017).

    • Toxicoinformatics today

      2020, Information Resources in Toxicology, Volume 1: Background, Resources, and Tools
    • The use of evidence from high-throughput screening and transcriptomic data in human health risk assessments

      2019, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Toxicogenomics and HTS have been successfully used in various areas of biological and medical sciences, and most notably in drug discovery and development; however, their use in assessing human health risk arising from environmental exposures to various toxicants is still at an incipient stage. Barriers, which have been identified as most limiting for wider use of toxicogenomics in HHRA include lack of guidelines for quality assessment and interpretation of toxicogenomic data, but also the lack of familiarity on the side of risk assessors (Vachon et al., 2017). Nevertheless, advances in Microarray/Sequencing Quality Control Project (MAQC/SEQC)(Shi et al., 2010a), a growing body of relevant literature, including seminal articles, such as (Bourdon-Lacombe et al., 2015), (Farmahin et al., 2017), (Chepelev et al., 2015), and the availability of refined tools such BMDExpress (Sciome, Research Triangle Park, NC) (Yang et al., 2007) address many of the perceived limitations and allow for some optimism regarding future use of these modern approaches in HHRA.

    • Determination of chemical-disease risk values to prioritize connections between environmental factors, genetic variants, and human diseases

      2019, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As part of the changing risk assessment paradigm outlined in NexGen, additional consideration should be given to data types not commonly considered in risk assessments (e.g. genomics and proteomics data) with focus on contextualizing results from a population health perspective (Cote et al., 2016, Cote et al., 2012; Krewski et al., 2014). While guidelines are being established to integrate transcriptomics and other data into human health risk assessment both within the US and worldwide (Buesen et al., 2017; Farmahin et al., 2017; Sauer et al., 2017), toxicogenomic considerations in risk assessment are underdeveloped (Boverhof and Zacharewski, 2006; Vachon et al., 2017). For example, incorporation of data on genetic polymorphisms resulting in differential population response to environmental exposures is lacking in risk assessments (Cote et al., 2012; Gwinn et al., 2017; Krewski et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text