Miscellaneous
The standard 11-lead ECG: Neglect of lead aVR in the classical limb lead display*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(96)80074-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigates how the format of limb lead display influences electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretation. The positive aspect of lead aVR (included in the classical display) is directed opposite to that of the other leads. This could lead to an ECG interpreter's disregard of lead aVR, thus providing a “standard 11-lead ECG.” It is hypothesized that when using the classical limb lead display, ECG interpreters often ignore lead aVR, even when considering complex ECGs. Thirty-five of the participants attending this International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology meeting were asked to interpret five complex ECGs, displayed in the classical format. Lead aVR had been replaced by lead -aVR on all of these recordings. Second, the participants were asked if they (1) used all 12 leads, (2) used lead aVR, and (3) noticed that lead aVR had been changed. The results indicate that a vast majority of interpreters (80–94%) did not detect when lead aVR had been reversed. This suggests that interpreters only use 11 of the standard leads when presented with the classical display method to evaluate clinical problems.

References (8)

  • AndersonS et al.

    Panoramic display of the orderly sequenced 12 lead ECG

    J Electrocardiol

    (1994)
  • WagnerGS

    Mariott's practical electrocardiography

    (1994)
  • DowerGE et al.

    Limb leads of the electrocardiogram: sequencing revisited

    Clin Cardiol

    (1990)
  • FumagalliB

    Unipolar value of standard limb leads: lead -aVR and rational arrangement of limb leads

    Am Heart J

    (1953)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

*

Supported by a Medical Student Research Fellow of the American Heart Association.

View full text