Seismic displacement response spectrum estimated from the frame analogy soil amplification model
Section snippets
Background and introduction
The displacement-based (DB) approach of assessing seismic performance has attracted intensive research attention in the world arena over the past decade, and is slowly gaining acceptance in practice. Fig. 1 shows some classical examples of situations in which displacement is clearly the governing criterion of seismically induced ultimate failure. The cited examples are a building responding into the inelastic range, which is prone to failure by a soft-storey mechanism [Fig. 1(a)], a bridge
General conceptual development
The modifications of seismic shear waves by soil overlying bedrock are dominated by a number of mechanisms, including multiple reflections of waves from interfaces of high impedance contrast, causing resonance. Resonance of the seismic waves trapped within the soil layer develops narrow-band periodic waves in certain soft soil columns (Fig. 2). The periodic waves are then translated into a prominent amplification at a distinct “site period” in the soil response spectrum. Such a resonance effect
Verification of the FASA-RSD procedure
The seismic displacement demand predicted by the FASA-RSD procedure, introduced in this paper, has both random and modelling uncertainties. Random uncertainties have been introduced by the use of the ensemble average rock response spectrum, since the characteristics of the individual earthquake accelerograms have been eliminated by the averaging. Modelling uncertainties have also been introduced by numerous simplifications in each step of the procedure. For example, FASA accounts for the effect
Application of the FASA-RSD procedure
The determination of the RSD utilising FASA comprises the following steps:
Step One: determination of site natural period, Tg [Eq. (1)];
Step Two: identification of RSV(Tg) from the design rock response spectra;
Step Three: determination of the soil response spectral velocity, RSVmax [Fig. 7 and , , ]; and
Step Four: determination of the bi-linear displacement response spectrum (RSD) based on the estimated Tg from Step One and the estimated RSVmax from Step Three (Fig. 11).
Commentaries relating to
Conclusions
- 1.
The displacement, velocity and acceleration response spectra of a soil site experiencing resonance are dependent mainly on the value of the site natural period (Tg). Such period dependence has been incorporated into the bi-linear compatible response spectrum model, as defined in Fig. 11.
- 2.
FASA draws the analogy between the vibrational behaviour of an MRF and that of a soil column in developing relationships to predict the peak ground velocity (PGV) on the soil surface [Eq. (5a) and Eq. (6a)] and
Acknowledgements
Invaluable contributions by Raymond Koo, Michael Cheng and Neaz Sheikh in providing results from SHAKE analyses for the purpose of Fig. 8, Fig. 10 and Appendix A are gratefully acknowledged. Contributions by information exchange in related investigations with Associate Professor T. Balendra of the National University of Singapore and by Associate Professor Pennung Warnitchai of The Asian Institute of Technology are also acknowledged.
The FASA model described in this paper has been developed as
References (29)
Seismic microzonation in Australia
J. Asian Earth Sci.
(2000)- Priestley MJN. Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings, In: Proceedings of the...
- et al.
A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites
Earthquake Engineering Research Centre Report EERC 72-12
(1972) - et al.
Substitute structure method for seismic design in R/C
J. Struct. Div., ASCE
(1976) - et al.
A global analysis of earthquake displacement response spectra
- et al.
Displacement spectra for seismic design
J. Earthquake Eng.
(1999) - et al.
Response spectral relationships for rock sites derived from the component attenuation model
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
(2000) - et al.
Response spectrum modelling for rock sites in low and moderate seismicity regions combining velocity, displacement and acceleration predictions
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
(2000) - et al.
Generation of synthetic earthquake accelerograms using seismological modelling: a review
J. Earthquake Eng.
(2000) - et al.
Site response studies for purpose of revising NEHRP seismic provisions
Earthquake Spectra
(1996)
Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification)
Earthquake Spectra
Introduction to a new procedure to construct site response spectrum
International building code, 2000 (IBC-2000)
Cited by (42)
Model updating of a masonry tower based on operational modal analysis: The role of soil-structure interaction
2022, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsA design spectrum model for flexible soil sites in regions of low-to-moderate seismicity
2017, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringA new site classification approach based on neural networks
2011, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Hence, estimating site effects is indispensable for a reliable site-specific seismic hazard assessment [4,5]. Seismologists and earthquake engineers have put substantial efforts in the past few decades to understand and estimate more accurately the site effects on ground motion characteristics and to take in account the associated effects in design of new structures and retrofitting of existing infrastructures (e.g., [6–11]). On the other hand, with the increase in the number of strong ground motion stations, as well as the higher quality of instrumentation in different geological conditions around the world, there is a growing interest of the proper use of these sets of strong ground motion data, which provide valuable information for both engineering and seismological communities, e.g., for the development of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs).
Seismic load estimates of distant subduction earthquakes affecting Singapore
2009, Engineering StructuresAn analytical model for displacement response spectrum considering the soil-resonance effect
2022, Earthquake and Structures