Re-engineering land administration systems for sustainable development — from rhetoric to reality
References (21)
- et al.
The evolution of the World Bank's Land Policy: principles, experience, and future challenges
World Bank Research Observer
(1999) - FIG, 1995. Statement on the Cadastre. International Federation of Surveyors....
- et al.
Reforming land and real estate markets
(2000) ‘Cadastre 2014’ — Report of Commission 7 Working Group 7.1, Modern cadastres
Proceedings, Commission 7, FIG XXI FIG Congress, Brighton, 20–24 July 1998.
(1998)- et al.(1998)
Design, development and implementation of the multi-purpose cadastre
(1975)- et al.
Benchmarking cadastral systems
The Australian Surveyor
(1997) - et al.
Cadastral trends: a synthesis
The Australian Surveyor
(1999) Bogor Declaration on Cadastral Reform
(1996)
Cited by (10)
Modern state formation and land management in South Korea: 1945–1960
2018, Land Use PolicyCitation Excerpt :In other words, the importance of land value seems to be recognized not only in ancient but also in modern states, but it seems that land use for economic purposes has become more diverse in modern states. Aside from these points, sustainability and equity are taken into account in modern states in terms of land management (Ting and Williamson, 1999, cited in Williamson, 2001: 279). In light of the above, it seems that land management in modern states provides a wider and deeper basis compared to those in ancient states, leading to land reform in the process of modern state formation.
On recognizing land administration as critical, public good infrastructure
2013, Land Use PolicyCitation Excerpt :Without adaptive management, infrastructures stagnate, decay and eventually fail. Williamson (2001a,b) relates how many land administration systems were not adapted from 19th century management paradigms and are unable to play the integrative role crucial to modern economic management, urban planning, and environmental management. The prevailing outcome is that recognized benefits inherent to land administration are put at risk: gains in public capital created through transaction fees and taxation are threatened (Dale and McLaughlin, 1999); growth of private wealth enabled by effective markets in real property, mortgages, and complex commodities is jeopardized (Wallace and Williamson, 2006a,b); the stability and order provided by secured land tenures is potentially compromised (Feder and Nishio, 1998; Deininger and Binswanger, 1999; Deininger, 2003); and the ability to make sustainable decisions relating to the environment is weakened (UN-FIG, 1999).
Integrated approach to the study of geohazards with application in southern Afar
2007, Journal of African Earth SciencesAssessment of land administration in Pakistan and the potential role of volunteered geographic information
2023, Handbook of Research on Driving Socioeconomic Development With Big DataAnalysis of the Technical Efficiency of the Programme of Modernisation of the Land Tenure Services in a Developing Country
2020, International Journal of Public Administration