Elsevier

Schizophrenia Research

Volume 26, Issues 2–3, 29 August 1997, Pages 121-125
Schizophrenia Research

Maternal exposure to influenza and paranoid schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(97)00056-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that schizophrenics exposed to influenza in the second trimester have more delusions of jealousy, delusions of reference and suspiciousness. We therefore hypothesised that the risk-increasing effect of in utero exposure to influenza would be particularly demonstrable in paranoid schizophrenia. We studied patients with an ICD diagnosis of schizophrenia in England and Wales who were born each month between 1923 and 1965 (N=17 247). Chi-square test for trend showed that an increase in influenza exposure level during the fifth month of gestation was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of patients with paranoid schizophrenia. However, logistic regression analysis including sex, seasonality and birth period in the model resulted in the loss of any significant association between in utero exposure to influenza and the development of paranoid schizophrenia, the loss of this significance being mainly accounted for by birth period. Therefore, the association between in utero exposure to influenza and subsequent development of paranoid schizophrenia we hypothesised was not supported by our data.

Introduction

A majority of epidemiological studies from different countries in both hemispheres have reported a relationship between maternal exposure to influenza during gestation and the development of schizophrenia in the offspring. Ten studies have shown a positive association between prenatal exposure to influenza and schizophrenia, three have produced equivocal results, while three found no such association (reviewed by Wright et al., in press). Two recent studies have further shown that this relationship is stronger in more strictly defined schizophrenia. In a Danish study (Takei et al., 1996), the association was more conspicuous in those with narrowly defined schizophrenia, while national data from the Netherlands (Takei et al., 1995b) also demonstrated a more marked association with typical schizophrenia.

However, the latter two studies used a crude distinction between `typical' and `atypical' schizophrenics and did not examine further whether any specific subtype of schizophrenia was responsible for this association. The effect of prenatal exposure to influenza in the development of schizophrenia appears more readily detectable in females (Takei et al., 1993Takei et al., 1994Takei et al., 1995a). Furthermore, Machon et al. (1995)claimed that schizophrenics who were exposed to influenza in the second trimester have significantly more symptoms of delusions of jealousy, delusions of reference and suspiciousness, than do schizophrenics exposed to influenza in the first or third trimester. Taken with the evidence that female schizophrenics more frequently manifest a paranoid picture than males (Goldstein et al., 1990), these findings suggest that paranoid schizophrenia may be the subtype responsible for the association previously found between prenatal exposure to influenza and narrowly defined schizophrenia. Therefore, we decided to test the hypothesis that the risk increasing effect of in utero exposure to influenza is associated particularly with the paranoid schizophrenia subtype.

Section snippets

Methods

We obtained, from 12 Regional Health Authorities, information on individuals who were born in England and Wales between 1923 and 1965 and had a first admission to psychiatric hospital and subsequent discharge between 1976 and 1986 with an ICD-8 or ICD-9 (World Health Organisation, 1978) diagnosis of schizophrenia. The following authorities provided data for the following years: North West Thames (1976–1984), South East Thames (1976–1986), Oxford (1979–1986), South West (1982–1987), North West

Results

First we identified the proportion of paranoid schizophrenics in each quartile of the exposure level. This showed an increase in the proportion of paranoid schizophrenics with an increase in influenza exposure level: 13.5% for very low, 16.7% for low, 19.5% for high, and 19.0% for very high influenza exposure (see Table 1). Using the very low influenza exposure level as reference, the odds ratio (OR) of paranoid to non-paranoid schizophrenics associated with influenza exposure was then

Limitations

The data used do not cover the whole of England and Wales, but around 80% of the population. In addition, some of the regional health authorities provided data for only some of the years between 1976 and 1986. However, it is highly unlikely that this caused any systematic bias in favour or against our hypothesis.

According to previous studies, especially our own studies (Takei et al., 1993, Takei et al., 1994, Takei et al., 1995a), the risk period of exposure to influenza was defined as the

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Stanley Foundation for their financial support; N.T. is a Stanley Research Fellow.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text