Elsevier

Australian Critical Care

Volume 14, Issue 1, February 2001, Pages 17-23
Australian Critical Care

Nurses and doctors communicating through medication order charts in critical care

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(01)80018-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The structure and content of written forms of communication dynamically interact with the social and historical conditions underlying critical care nursing activities. One important form of documentation regularly used in the critical care area is the medication order chart. This paper considers the ways in which medication order charts are used to structure interactions among nurses and between nurses and doctors. The critical ethnographic study upon which this paper is based involved a research group of six nurses who worked in one critical care unit. Data collection methods involved professional journalling, participant observation and individual and focus group interviews. Data analysis identified four major issues for consideration: imbalance between medical knowledge and legal authority; the nurse as go-between and medication expert; coaching the doctor; and the self policing nurse. The critical care nurse's role extends beyond the traditional passive activity of medication administration. By exploring the power relations underlying this role, there is greater opportunity for improved nursing relationships and patient care.

References (30)

  • WolfZ

    Medication errors and nursing responsibility

    Holist Nurs Pract

    (1989)
  • YinB et al.

    The association between medications and falls in Australian nursing homes

    Med J Aust

    (1994)
  • GirottiMJ et al.

    Medication administration errors in an adult intensive care unit

    Heart Lung

    (1987)
  • KingB

    Medication errors — an ongoing problem

    Aust Clin Rev

    (1993)
  • O'SheaE

    Factors contributing to medication errors: a literature review

    J Clin Nurs

    (1999)
  • Cited by (21)

    • An education intervention to improve nursing students' understanding of medication safety

      2015, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, much of the literature affords a narrow view of multidisciplinary work by focussing on a particular aspect. For example, Varpio et al. (2008) focus on interprofessional communication related to medication errors and Manias and Street (2001) investigated communication processes through written orders. Traditionally undergraduate education of healthcare professionals has occurred in silos (Barnsteiner et al., 2007; Engum and Jeffries, 2012), with few opportunities for interprofessional collaboration (Barnsteiner et al., 2007).

    • The effects of physical environments in medical wards on medication communication processes affecting patient safety

      2014, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our intention in the study is to understand the contextualised medication communication practices and broad social relationships surrounding these communication practices, by making physical space visible in the research process and contesting individuals' use of physical space. Critical ethnography involves participants engaging in the process of reflexivity to make meanings of their practices in their own social world (Manias and Street, 2001). In this study, participants reflected on the research data and challenged their daily practices and working environments.

    • Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it: Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies

      2013, Journal of Critical Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      One author invited readers and researchers to reconsider historical hierarchies and discourses that do not take into account current interprofessional dynamics and the actual blurring of roles, as the medical basis of nursing has increased and standards for doctors to care have changed [23], whereas another showed the interreliance of nurses and doctors in several areas, including medication management [28,29]. Overall, hierarchical relationships are described in most studies as hindering care and as potentially harmful [20,22-25,28-31], whereas processes that flatten hierarchies [31] or help clinicians bond [27] are seen as helpful, and top-down decisions perceived to be physician-driven as invitations to resistance [20,24,29,30,32]. More on resistance below.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text