The use of seclusion in the year 2000: What Has Changed?
References (16)
- et al.
Hallucinatory experiences of psychiatric patients in seclusion
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
(1994) An exploration of ethical issues associated with the use of seclusion of psychiatric patients
Collegian
(1995)- et al.
Seclusion or solitary confinement: therapeutic or punitive treatment
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental health Nursing
(1996) Seclusion
Journal of Psycho-logical Nursing
(1987)A descriptive study of seclusion: the unit environment, patient behaviour, and nursing interventions
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
(1989)- et al.
Benchmarking exercise on seclusion
(1998) - et al.
A benchmarking exercise on aggression
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing
(1999) - et al.
Seclusion the use of a stress model to appraise the problem
Nursing Times
(1995)
Cited by (26)
Implementing seclusion in forensic mental health care: A qualitative study of staff decision making
2018, Archives of Psychiatric NursingCitation Excerpt :Focus group participants suggested that new staff nurses should attend some form of reflection as part of their development although this finding would also suggest their attendance is critical in order to shape their thinking which, in turn, should influence practise. Wynaden et al. (2001) described nurses as having a moral responsibility to explore their own feelings about seclusion and of its legal and ethical consequences while Van Der Merwe, Muir-Cochrane, Jones, Tziggili, and Bowers (2013) cited the danger in seclusion use becoming habituated towards and that reflection and team debriefings play a vital role in addressing this. Boumans, Egger, Souren, Mann-Poll, and Hutschemaekers (2012) found that team reflexivity was related to the tendency to prevent seclusion and Mann-Poll, Smit, Koekkoek, and Hutschemaekers (2015) recommend that supervision and debrief sessions are facilitated as a matter of routine.
Exploring Patterns of Seclusion Use in Australian Mental Health Services
2011, Archives of Psychiatric NursingImpacts of Seclusion and the Seclusion Room: Exploring the Perceptions of Mental Health Nurses in Australia
2011, Archives of Psychiatric NursingCitation Excerpt :Seclusion is therefore not being endorsed as a therapeutic intervention as has been concluded from other research (Lee et al., 2003; Meehan et al., 2004; Wynaden et al., 2001); however, the therapeutic potential of seclusion has not been dismissed, which suggests that participants remain ambivalent despite their clear acknowledgement of negative reactions. When considering the impact of the seclusion room itself on patients, the participants' responses reflected the negative impacts observed from other research (Bonner et al., 2002; Holmes et al., 2004; Meehan et al., 2004, 2000; Wynaden et al., 2001). Despite this, 97.6% of participants believe that the seclusion room sometimes or always has a calming impact.
International variation in containment measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients: A comparative questionnaire survey
2007, International Journal of Nursing StudiesGetting a grip on Safewards: The cross impact of clinical supervision and Safewards model on clinical practice
2023, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing