Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:03:49.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2017

Hyun Jin Kim
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Frederik Juliaan Vervaet
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Selim Ferruh Adali
Affiliation:
Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi, Turkey
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Eurasian Empires in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages
Contact and Exchange between the Graeco-Roman World, Inner Asia and China
, pp. xv - xvi
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemany, A. 2000. Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation. Leiden, Boston and Köln.Google Scholar
Auyang, S.Y. 2014. The Dragon and the Eagle: the Rise and Fall of the Chinese and Roman Empires. Armonk.Google Scholar
Bachrach, B.S. 1973. A History of the Alans in the West. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Beecroft, A. 2010. Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China: Patterns of Literary Circulation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bemmann, J. and Schmauder, M. (eds.) 2015. Complexity of Interaction along the Eurasian Steppe Zone in the First Millennium CE. Bonn.Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. 1997. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York.Google Scholar
Canepa, M.P. (ed.) 2010. Theorizing Cross-Cultural Interaction among the Ancient and Early Medieval Mediterranean, Near East and Asia. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Denecke, W. 2014. Classical World Literatures: Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Comparisons. New York.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, M.H. 2006. ‘Das römische Imperium und das China der Han-Zeit: Ansätze zu einer historischen KomparatistikLatomus 65: 880–97.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, N. 2011. ‘Ethnogenesis, Coevolution and Political Morphology of the Earliest Steppe Empire: The Xiongnu Question Revisited’, in Brosseder, U. and Miller, B.K. (eds.) Xiongnu Archaeology: Multidisciplinary Perspectives of the First Steppe Empire in Inner Asia. Bonn, 3548.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A.M. 2006. Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique. Rome.Google Scholar
Golden, P.B. 1992. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State-formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Gruen, E.S. 1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. 2 Vols. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grygiel, J.J. 2006. Great Powers and Geopolitical Change. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Hall, D.L. and Ames, R.T. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany.Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 370–27 BCE. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jullien, F. 2000. Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece. New York.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R.D. 2012. The Revenge of Geography: What the Map tells us about the Coming Conflicts and the Battle against Fate. New York.Google Scholar
Kim, H.J. 2009. Ethnicity and Foreigners in Ancient Greece and China. London.Google Scholar
Kim, H.J. 2013. The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
King, R. and Schilling, D. (eds.) 2011. How Should One Live?: Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kuriyama, S. 1999. The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine. New York.Google Scholar
Laruelle, M. 2008. Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire. Baltimore.Google Scholar
La Vaissière, E. de. 2005. ‘Huns et XiongnuCentral Asiatic Journal 49 (1): 326.Google Scholar
Lieu, S. 1992. Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1996. Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 2002. The Ambitions of Curiosity: Understanding the World in Ancient Greece and China. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 2004. Ancient Worlds, Modern Reflections: Philosophical Perspectives on Greek and Chinese Science and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 2005. The Delusions of Invulnerability: Wisdom and Morality in Ancient Greece, China and Today. London.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. and Sivin, N. 2002. The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Lorenz, G. 1990. ‘Das Imperium Romanum und das China der Han-Dynastie: Gedanken und Materialien zu einem VergleichInformationen für Geschichtslehrer 12: 960.Google Scholar
Lu, X. 1998. Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century B.C.E.: A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric. Columbia.Google Scholar
Mackinder, H. 1904. ‘The geographical pivot of historyGeographical Journal 23 (4): 421–39.Google Scholar
Motomura, R. 1991. ‘An approach towards a comparative study of the Roman empire and the Ch’in and Han empiresKodai 2: 61–9.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. 1997. ‘Vergleichende Beobachtungen zur griechisch-römischen und altchinesischen GeschichtsschreibungSaeculum 48: 213–53.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. 2003. ‘Zu Sinnhorizont und Funktion griechischer, römischer und altchinesischer Geschichtsschreibung’, in Hölkeskamp, K., Rüsen, J., Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. and Grütter, H.T. (eds.) Sinn (in) der Antike: Orientierungssysteme, Leitbilder und Wertkonzepte im Altertum. Mainz, 3354.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. 2006. ‘Tacitus und Sima Qian: eine AnnäherungPhilologus 150: 115–35.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. 2007. ‘Tacitus und Sima Qian: Persönliche Erfahrung und historiographische PerspektivePhilologus 151: 127–52.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. 2008. ‘Tacite (et Tite-Live) et Sima Qian: la vision politique d’historiens latins et chinoisBulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 2: 123–55.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. and Mittag, A. (eds.) 2008. Conceiving the Empire; China and Rome Compared. Oxford.Google Scholar
Poo, M.-C. 2005. Enemies of Civilization: Attitudes toward Foreigners in Ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt and China. Albany.Google Scholar
Raphals, L. 1992. Knowing Words: Wisdom and Cunning in the Classical Traditions of China and Greece. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Raphals, L. 2013. Divination and Prediction in Early China and Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reding, J.-P. 2004. Comparative Essays in Early Greek and Chinese Rational Thinking. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Schaberg, D. 1999. ‘Travel, geography, and the imperial imagination in fifth-century Athens and Han ChinaComparative Literature 51: 152–91.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (ed.) 2009. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. New York.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (ed.) 2015. State Power in Ancient China and Rome. New York.Google Scholar
Shankman, S. and Durrant, S.W. 2000. The Siren and the Sage: Knowledge and Wisdom in Ancient Greece and China. Albany.Google Scholar
Shankman, S. and Durrant, S.W. 2002. Early China/Ancient Greece: Thinking through Comparisons. Albany.Google Scholar
Sim, M. 2007. Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. 2014. The High Command in the Roman Republic. The Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. 2009. ‘Ancient Greece, early China: Sino-Hellenic studies and comparative approaches to the classical world. A review articleJournal of Hellenic Studies 129: 89109.Google Scholar
Yu, J. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. London.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2010. Festivals, Feasts, and Gender Relations in Ancient China and Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×