Alegría de la Colina, A. & García Mayo, M. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In García Mayo, M. P. (Ed.), Investigating Tasks in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Aydin, Z. & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–80.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Storch, N. (2016). Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Bradley, L., Lindström, B., & Rystedt, H. (2010). Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL, 22(2), 247–65.Google Scholar

Brooks, L. & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In Mackey, A. & Polio, C. (Eds.), Multiple Perspectives on Interaction in SLA (pp. 58–89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bui, T. H. G. (2015). Using collaboration and technology to enhance Vietnamese students’ English writing skills. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.Google Scholar

Carson, J. G. & Nelson, G. L. (1994) Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing 3(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular Texts/Plural Authors. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Elola, I. & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, A. & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41, 365–78.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2003). Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortune, A. & Thorp, D. (2001). Knotted and entangled: New light on the identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language Awareness, 10(2–3), 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guardado, M. & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24, 443–61.Google Scholar

Hansen, J. G. & Liu, J (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer review. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–8.Google Scholar

Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 79–95.Google Scholar

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–30.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260–76.Google Scholar

Leki, I. ( 2007). Undergraduates in a Second Language: Challenges and Complexities of Academic Literacy Development. New York: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Li, M. & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 61–82.Google Scholar

Li, M. & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in Wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120.Google Scholar

Liu, J. & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lund, A. & Smørdal, O. (2006). Is There Space for the Teacher in a Wiki? Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym’06). Odense, Denmark: ACM Press, 37–46.Google Scholar

Mak, B. & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System 36, 437–55.Google Scholar

Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009) The temporal dimension and problem solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In Manchón, R. M. (Ed.), Writing in Foreign Language Contexts. Learning, Teaching, and Research (pp. 102–29). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, S. J. & McMahon, S. (1992). From convention to invention: Three approaches to peer interactions during writing. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Miller, N. (Eds.), Interaction in Cooperative Groups. The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning (pp. 17–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Min, H. -T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33, 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Min, H. -T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–41.Google Scholar

Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 496–516.Google Scholar

Nelson, G. L. & Carson, J.G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness of peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113–31.Google Scholar

Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness 18(3–4), 384–402.Google Scholar

Oskoz, A. & Elola, I. (2012). Understanding the impact of social tools in the FL writing classroom: Activity theory at work. In Kessler, G., Oskoz, A. & Elola, I. (Eds.), Technology across Writing Contexts and Tasks (pp. 131–53). San Marcos, Texas: CALICO.Google Scholar

Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 67–89.Google Scholar

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouhshad, A. & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In Sato, M. & Ballinger, S. (Eds.), Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. Pedagogical Potentials and Research Agenda (pp. 267–90). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing 20(4), 286–305.Google Scholar

Shin, S. -Y., Lidster, R., Sabraw, S., & Yeager, R. (2016). The effects of proficiency differences in pairs on idea units in collaborative text reconstruction task. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 366–86.Google Scholar

Steinberger, F. (2017). Synchronous collaborative L2 writing with technology. Interaction and learning. Doctoral thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. Available: https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21677/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 5(1), 119–58.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2004). Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(4), 457–80.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2017a). Peer corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing. In Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (Eds.), Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 66–79). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2017b). Implementing and assessing collaborative writing activities in EAP classes. In Bitchener, J., Storch, N. & Wette, R. (Eds.), Teaching Writing for Academic Purposes to Multilingual Students: Instructional Approaches (pp. 130–44). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Storch, N. & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355–75.Google Scholar

Storch, N. & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48.Google Scholar

Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In del Pilar Garcia-Mayo, M. (Ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 157–77). London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J., (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In Byrnes, H. (Ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2010). Talking-it-through: Languaging as a source of learning. In Batestone, R. (Ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 112–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–37.Google Scholar

Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsui, A. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147–70.Google Scholar

Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing. Context and Issues (pp. 23–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Order Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar Dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.Google Scholar

Yang, L. (2014). Examining the mediational means in collaborative writing: Case studies of undergraduate ESL students in business course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 15(3), 179–200.Google Scholar

Yoshida, R. (2008). Learners’ perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 525–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19, 572–93.Google Scholar

Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2016). State-of-the-Art Article. Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar