Book contents
- Invasive Species
- Invasive Species
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 The Allocation of Inspection Resources
- 2 Tools for Designing and Evaluating Post-Border Surveillance Systems
- 3 Control Charts for Biosecurity Monitoring and Surveillance
- 4 Open-Source Intelligence Gathering and Open-Analysis Intelligence for Biosecurity
- 5 Predicting Distributions of Invasive Species
- 6 Mapping Risks and Impacts of Invasive Alien Species with Dynamic Simulation Models
- 7 Models for Understanding Disease Dynamics
- 8 Bayesian Networks for Import Risk Assessment
- 9 Getting the Message Right: Tools for Improving Biosecurity Risk Communication
- 10 Cost–Benefit Analysis for Biosecurity Decisions
- 11 Valuing Protection against Invasive Species Using Contingent Valuation
- 12 Management of Invasive Species: Info-Gap Perspectives
- 13 Decisions with Relative Robustness
- 14 Optimising Resource Allocation
- 15 Value of Information Analysis as a Decision Support Tool for Biosecurity
- 16 Declaring Eradication of an Invasive Species
- 17 Surveillance for Detection of Pests and Diseases: How Sure Can We Be of Their Absence?
- 18 Some Questions to Ask Yourself
- Index
- References
1 - The Allocation of Inspection Resources
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 July 2017
Book contents
- Invasive Species
- Invasive Species
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 The Allocation of Inspection Resources
- 2 Tools for Designing and Evaluating Post-Border Surveillance Systems
- 3 Control Charts for Biosecurity Monitoring and Surveillance
- 4 Open-Source Intelligence Gathering and Open-Analysis Intelligence for Biosecurity
- 5 Predicting Distributions of Invasive Species
- 6 Mapping Risks and Impacts of Invasive Alien Species with Dynamic Simulation Models
- 7 Models for Understanding Disease Dynamics
- 8 Bayesian Networks for Import Risk Assessment
- 9 Getting the Message Right: Tools for Improving Biosecurity Risk Communication
- 10 Cost–Benefit Analysis for Biosecurity Decisions
- 11 Valuing Protection against Invasive Species Using Contingent Valuation
- 12 Management of Invasive Species: Info-Gap Perspectives
- 13 Decisions with Relative Robustness
- 14 Optimising Resource Allocation
- 15 Value of Information Analysis as a Decision Support Tool for Biosecurity
- 16 Declaring Eradication of an Invasive Species
- 17 Surveillance for Detection of Pests and Diseases: How Sure Can We Be of Their Absence?
- 18 Some Questions to Ask Yourself
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Invasive SpeciesRisk Assessment and Management, pp. 1 - 16Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Baillie, D. H. & Klaassen, C. A. J. (2006). Credit to and in acceptance sampling. Statistica Neerlandica, 60(3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, P. D. (2002). A continuous sampling plan using CUSUMs. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29(8), 1121–1133.Google Scholar
Cannon, R. M. (2009). Inspecting and monitoring on a restricted budget – where best to look? Preventative Veterinary Medicine, 92, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, H. F. (1943). A sampling inspection plan for continuous production. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14(3), 264–279.Google Scholar
Dodge, H. F. & Torrey, M. N. (1951). Additional continuous sampling plans. Industrial Quality Control, 7(5), 7–12.Google Scholar
Gaba, A. & Winkler, R. L. (1992). Implications of errors in survey data: A Bayesian model. Management Science, 38(7), 913–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindaraju, K. & Kandasamy, C. (2000). Design of generalized CSP-C continuous sampling plan. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(7), 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. O. & Gastwirth, J. L. (1991). Bayesian inference for medical screening tests: Approximations useful for the analysis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 53(2), 427–439.Google Scholar
Klaassen, C. A. J. (2001). Credit in acceptance sampling on attributes. Technometrics, 43(2), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, G. J. (1953). A note on Dodge’s continuous inspection plan. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24(3), 480–484.Google Scholar
Lieberman, G. J. & Solomon, H. (1955). Multi-level continuous sampling plans. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26(4), 686–704.Google Scholar
Press, W. H. (2009). Strong profiling is not mathematically optimal for discovering rare malfeasors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(6), 1716–1719.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. P., Burgman, M. A., Atkinson, W., et al. (2008). AQIS import clearance data framework. Technical Report 0804. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, the University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. P., Burgman, M. A. & Cannon, R. (2011). Allocating surveillance resources to reduce ecological invasions: Maximising detections and information about the threat. Ecological Applications, 21(4), 1410–1417.Google Scholar
Stephens, K. S. (1995). How to perform continuous sampling, 2nd ed. ASQC Basic References in Quality Control, Vol. 2: Statistical Techniques. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality Control, Statistics Division.Google Scholar
Tuyl, F., Gerlach, R. & Mengersen, K. (2009). Posterior predictive arguments in favour of the Bayes-Laplace prior as the consensus prior for binomial and multinomial parameters. Bayesian Analysis, 4(1), 151–158.Google Scholar
Wald, A. & Wolfowitz, J. (1945). Sampling inspection plans for continuous production which insure a prescribed limit on the outgoing quality. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 16(1), 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by