Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:22:22.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Cost–Benefit Analysis for Biosecurity Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Andrew P. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Terry Walshe
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Marine Science
Mark A. Burgman
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Mike Nunn
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Invasive Species
Risk Assessment and Management
, pp. 229 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, D., Bilston, L. & Lynch, K. (2000). The potential economic benefits of the Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata) eradication program. Working paper. Queensland, Australia: Department of Natural Resources and Mines.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. & James, S. (1998). On the need for more economic assessment of quarantine policies. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 42(4), 425444.Google Scholar
Balay, S., Brown, J., Buschelman, K., et al. (2013a). PETSc users manual. Technical Report ANL-95/11, Revision 3.4. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Balay, S., Brown, J., Buschelman, K., et al. (2013b). PETSc: Portable extensible toolkit for scientific computation. Available from www.mcs.anl.gov/petscGoogle Scholar
Balay, S., Gropp, W. D., McInnes, L. C. & Smith, B. F. (1997). Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In Arge, E., Bruaset, A. M. & Langtangen, H. P. (eds.), Modern software tools in scientific computing (pp. 163202).Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T. W., Carpenter, T. E. & Thurmond, M. C. (2001). Direct and indirect contact rates among beef dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 62(9), 1477.Google Scholar
Bates, T. W., Carpenter, T. E. & Thurmond, M. C. (2003a). Benefit-cost analysis of vaccination and preemptive slaughter as a means or eradicating foot-and-mouth disease. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 64(7), 805812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, T. W., Thurmond, M. C., Hietala, S. K., et al. (2003b). Surveillance for detection of foot-and-mouth disease. Journal of the American Veterinary Association, 223(5), 609614.Google Scholar
Breukers, A., Mourits, M., van den Werf, W. & Lansink, A. O. (2008). Costs and benefits of controlling quarantine diseases: A bio-economic modeling approach. Agricultural Economics, 38(2), 137149.Google Scholar
Cacho, O. J., Wise, R. M., Hester, S. M. & Sinden, J. A. (2008). Bioeconomic modelling for control of weeds in natural environments. Ecological Econonomics, 65(3), 559568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, A. S., Ritchie, B. W., Papandrea, F. & Bennett, J. (2010). Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach. Tourism Management, 31(2), 213220.Google Scholar
Chowell, G., Rivas, A. L., Hengartner, N. W., Hyman, J. M. & Castillo-Chavez, C. (2005). The role of spatial mixing in the spread of foot-and-mouth disease. http://math.lanl.gov/~gchowell/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Cook, D. C., Carrasco, L. R., Paini, D. R. & Fraser, R. W. (2011). Estimating the social welfare effects of New Zealand apple imports. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55(4), 599620.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D. C., Woldendorp, G., Burgess, M. B. & Barry, S. C. (2003). Prioritising sleeper weeds for eradication: Selection of species based on potential impacts on agriculture and feasibility of eradication. Working Paper. Canberra, Australia: Bureau of Rural Sciences.Google Scholar
DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). (2002). Origin of the UK foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in 2001, June. Unpublished Report.Google Scholar
GAO (United States General Accounting Office) (2002). Foot and mouth disease: To protect U.S. livestock: USDA must remain vigilant and resolve outstanding issues. Report to the Honorable Tom Daschle, U.S. Senate. July 2003.Google Scholar
Gohin, A. & Rault, A. (2013). Assessing the economic costs of a foot and mouth disease outbreak on Brittany: A dynamic computable general equilibrium analysis. Food Policy, 39, 97107.Google Scholar
Harris, S., Brown, J. & Timmins, S. (2001). Weed surveillance: How often to search? Science for Conservation 175. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
Hester, S. M., Odom, D. I. S., Cacho, O. J. & Sinden, J. A. (2004). Eradication of exotic weeds in Australia: Comparing effort and expenditure. Working paper. Armidale, Australia: University of New England.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, J., Sims, L. & McLeod, A. (2006). Some direct costs of control for avian influenza. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar
Keogh-Brown, M. R., Smith, R. D., Edmunds, J. W. & Beutels, P. (2009). The macroeconomics impacts of pandemic influenza: Estimates from models of the United Kingdom, France, Belgium and the Netherlands. European Journal of Health Economics, 11(6), 543554.Google Scholar
Kompas, T. & Che, T. N. (2009). A practical border quarantine measure for imported livestock. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for Biosecurity and Environmental Economics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Kompas, T., Che, T. N., Cao, L. Y. & Klijn, N. (2004). Optimal surveillance measures against an imported pest or disease: An application to Papua fruit fly in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Kompas, T., Chu, L., Che, T. N., Nguyen, H. & White, K. (2013). Optimal surveillance measures against exotic weeds: An application to hawkweed in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for Biosecurity and Environmental Economics, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Leroux, A. & MacLaren, D. (2011). The optimal time to remove quarantine bans under uncertainty: The case of Australian bananas. Economic Record, 87(276), 140152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, J. D. (2002). Economic issues related to quarantine in international trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 329348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nord, E., Pinto, J. L., Richardson, J., Menzel, P. & Ubel, P. (1999). Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Economics, 8(1), 2539.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D., Cacho, O. J., Hester, S. M. & Sims-Chilton, N. M. (2011a). Estimating the duration and cost of weed eradication programmes. In Veitch, C. R., Clout, M. N. & Towns, D. R. (eds.), Island invasives: Eradication and management: Proceedings of the International Conference on Island Invasives (pp. 472476). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, and Auckland, New Zealand: Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D., Csurhes, S. M., Markula, A. & Hannan-Jones, M. A. (2011b). Predicting the cost of eradication for 41 Class 1 declared weeds in Queensland. Plant Protection Quarterly, 26(2), 4246.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D. & Lawes, R. (2007). Evaluation of the Australian branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) eradication program. Weed Science, 55(6), 644651.Google Scholar
Pearce, D., Atkinson, G. and Mourato, S. (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. ISBN 9264010041Google Scholar
Prieto, L. & Sacristán, J. A. (2003). Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 80.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. & Pitcairn, M. J. (2002). When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? In Veitch, C. R. & Clout, M. N. (eds.), Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive species (pp. 249253). Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, M. A. & Disney, W. T. (2003). Modeling alternative mitigation strategies for a hypothetical outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in the United States. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 58(1–2), 2552.Google Scholar
Smith, R. D., Keogh-Brown, M. R. & Barnett, T. (2011). Estimating the economic impact of pandemic influenza: An application of the computable general equilibrium model to the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 73(2), 235244.Google Scholar
Soliman, T, Mourits, M. C. M., Oude-Lansink, A. G. J. M. & van der Werf, W. (2013). Economic justification for quarantine status – the case study of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ in the European Union. Plant Pathology, 62(5), 11061113.Google Scholar
USCB (US Census Bureau). (2005). Tourist statistics. Available from www.tia.org/researchpubs/economic_research_impact_tourism.html.Google Scholar
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2005). National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available from www.usda.gov/nass/Google Scholar
Wang, X., Bennett, J., Xie, C., Zhang, Z. & Liang, D. (2007). Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: A choice modeling approach. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 114125.Google Scholar
Wittwer, G., McKirdy, S. & Wilson, R. (2005). Regional economic impacts of a plant disease incursion using a general equilibrium approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 49(1), 7589.Google Scholar
Woldendorp, G. & Bomford, M. (2004). Weed eradication: Strategies, timeframes and costs. Canberra, Australia: Bureau of Rural Sciences.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×